Re: moving a 3494 library
Hi How to check the WWN of fiber devices on linux system. Tape devices on linux are /dev/st0 /dev/st1 ( o ) --- I,I ' ' I,I (( )) With Best Regards, Sandeep Jain ** Legal Disclaimer * This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you. * -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Clark Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 8:01 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] moving a 3494 library There are two TSM servers, one at SiteA, the 2nd at SiteB SiteA manages two 3494 tape libraries, one at SiteA and the 2nd at SiteB (connected via longwave fibre), and is the tape library manager for both TSM servers. The 3494 at SiteB is defined at shared. All the volumes on the tape library at SiteB are now owned by the TSM server at SiteB. The goal is to remove the client instance and have ServerB locally manage the library, and retain its current volumes. The suggested procedure / sequence is: 1). Checkout the vols in the library at SiteB 2). Remove the 3494 defs for the 3494 at SiteB from the TSM server at SiteA 3). Remove and redefine the library on the TSM server at SiteB (non-shared) 4). Checkin the vols (private) in SiteB 5). Remove references in volhist on SiteA to volumes in 3494 in SiteB. Anyone see a problem with this sequence? DISCLAIMER “The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of information in this e-mail is strictly prohibited, and you are requested to contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.Thank you This email has been scanned for any virus infection at the sending end.
Re: moving a 3494 library
? 3). Remove and redefine the library on the TSM server at SiteB (non- shared) - Original Message - From: Robert Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 10:43 PM Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] moving a 3494 library You don't address making sure the 3494 will allow access by the TSM server at site B. [RC] On Oct 1, 2007, at 7:30 AM, Larry Clark wrote: There are two TSM servers, one at SiteA, the 2nd at SiteB SiteA manages two 3494 tape libraries, one at SiteA and the 2nd at SiteB (connected via longwave fibre), and is the tape library manager for both TSM servers. The 3494 at SiteB is defined at shared. All the volumes on the tape library at SiteB are now owned by the TSM server at SiteB. The goal is to remove the client instance and have ServerB locally manage the library, and retain its current volumes. The suggested procedure / sequence is: 1). Checkout the vols in the library at SiteB 2). Remove the 3494 defs for the 3494 at SiteB from the TSM server at SiteA 3). Remove and redefine the library on the TSM server at SiteB (non- shared) 4). Checkin the vols (private) in SiteB 5). Remove references in volhist on SiteA to volumes in 3494 in SiteB. Anyone see a problem with this sequence?
moving a 3494 library (resend)
didn't get a ack, so resending... There are two TSM servers, one at SiteA, the 2nd at SiteB SiteA manages two 3494 tape libraries, one at SiteA and the 2nd at SiteB (connected via longwave fibre), and is the tape library manager for both TSM servers. The 3494 at SiteB is defined at shared. All the volumes on the tape library at SiteB are now owned by the TSM server at SiteB. The goal is to remove the client instance and have ServerB locally manage the library, and retain its current volumes. The suggested procedure / sequence is: 1). Checkout the vols in the library at SiteB 2). Remove the 3494 defs for the 3494 at SiteB from the TSM server at SiteA 3). Remove and redefine the library on the TSM server at SiteB (non-shared) 4). Checkin the vols (private) in SiteB 5). Remove references in volhist on SiteA to volumes in 3494 in SiteB. Anyone see a problem with this sequence?
moving a 3494 library
There are two TSM servers, one at SiteA, the 2nd at SiteB SiteA manages two 3494 tape libraries, one at SiteA and the 2nd at SiteB (connected via longwave fibre), and is the tape library manager for both TSM servers. The 3494 at SiteB is defined at shared. All the volumes on the tape library at SiteB are now owned by the TSM server at SiteB. The goal is to remove the client instance and have ServerB locally manage the library, and retain its current volumes. The suggested procedure / sequence is: 1). Checkout the vols in the library at SiteB 2). Remove the 3494 defs for the 3494 at SiteB from the TSM server at SiteA 3). Remove and redefine the library on the TSM server at SiteB (non-shared) 4). Checkin the vols (private) in SiteB 5). Remove references in volhist on SiteA to volumes in 3494 in SiteB. Anyone see a problem with this sequence?
Re: moving a 3494 library
You don't address making sure the 3494 will allow access by the TSM server at site B. [RC] On Oct 1, 2007, at 7:30 AM, Larry Clark wrote: There are two TSM servers, one at SiteA, the 2nd at SiteB SiteA manages two 3494 tape libraries, one at SiteA and the 2nd at SiteB (connected via longwave fibre), and is the tape library manager for both TSM servers. The 3494 at SiteB is defined at shared. All the volumes on the tape library at SiteB are now owned by the TSM server at SiteB. The goal is to remove the client instance and have ServerB locally manage the library, and retain its current volumes. The suggested procedure / sequence is: 1). Checkout the vols in the library at SiteB 2). Remove the 3494 defs for the 3494 at SiteB from the TSM server at SiteA 3). Remove and redefine the library on the TSM server at SiteB (non- shared) 4). Checkin the vols (private) in SiteB 5). Remove references in volhist on SiteA to volumes in 3494 in SiteB. Anyone see a problem with this sequence?