Re: V201206 old java client library Report Definition selector fields and predicates
Christian,
This is more a java suggestion than anything to do with AdWords as your
posted code works, but I think it is aligned with the nature of the
question.
A cleaner way to handle this would be to extract the array of strings out
of the constructor calls and setter methods and instead make them fields of
your class. This also saves on garbage collection overhead if you make
multiple calls to that method reusing the same instance of your class. I
feel this will also make the code much more maintainable in the future.
You can then abstract the logic out to something like this(which addAll
most likely does anyway under the covers):
{
// class level declarations to save on garbage collection for things that
are always initialized with the same value in a particular method
String[] fieldsInReport = new String[] {AdGroupId, KeywordId, Id,
Impressions, Clicks, Cost, AveragePosition, Date};
String[] predicateValues = new String[] {ENABLED, PAUSED, DISABLED};
...
// inside the method which uses the arrays of Strings
for(String field : fieldsInReport){
fields.add(field);
}
statusPredicate = new Predicate();
statusPredicate.setField(Status);
statusPredicate.setOperator(PredicateOperator.IN);
ListString values = statusPredicate.getValues();
for(String value : predicateValues){
values.add(value);
}
}
AdWords team : While thinking about this question I noticed the
documentation is broken for the new Selector class in
ReportDefinitionService:
https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/latest/ReportDefinitionService.Selector
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
bonjour , je chercche une personne , qui accepte de m'aider par skype pour gérer mon website
bonjour , je cherche une personne qui accepte de m'aider a mettre sur pied mon compte adsense .grace au skype merci de me répondre -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
Recovering from production error: UNEXPECTED_INTERNAL_API_ERROR
What's the best way to recover from an UNEXPECTED_INTERNAL_API_ERROR in production? Should we treat it as an intermittent error and resubmit the job after 30 seconds? Or has the job possibly gone through anyway? -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
Re: Getting AdMob usage data?
Ping, any update on this? I can see the admob data in a Managed Placements Performance report, but am not sure how to be able to identify it 100% of the time, so that I only load the admob data and not the other managed placement data (because that data is also present in the Criteria Performance Report and gets loaded from there). I can see my current admob data because we put admob into the campaign name, but that's not very reliable for the long term. So, what is the Google advice on filtering out (either on the request end, or on my end once I receive the unfiltered data) the admob data from the Management Placements Report? thanks reed -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
Re: Video campaigns statistics
Hi Kevin, Seems I can see video campaign statistics now on MCC level, can you confirm this is correct across the board? Thanks, Rem -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
Can't specify an Adgroup Status selector on AdGroupCriterionService. Stuck for a solution.
We're trying to use the AdgroupCriterionService to get some information about *active *keywords only. We're using the 'Status' selector field to ensure only data for active keywords are returned. However, there are deleted Adgroups whose keywords are still in 'active' status. Adwords users typically just pause or delete an adgroup without having to change the status of each keyword inside it. As you can guess, the issue we now have is we're getting back data for these active keywords that are in the deleted adgroups! I can't see any selector field that we can use to filter by the Adgroup status as well. Any ideas how we can get round this issue please? Is there any other way we can target only the truly active keywords in the campaign? Thanks in advance for any help with this. Oliver -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
OAuth2 in the new Java client library
I'm looking at migrating to the new Java client library as part of the upgrade from v201109. One thing I thought was going to be a benefit of this migration was long-lived access tokens, to enable long-running services to use the API without having to worry about refreshing the ClientLogin token. Now that I've done some more digging, it appears that OAuth2 doesn't have long-lived tokens. Instead, you get an access token and a refresh token, and there is some way that an expired access token gets refreshed behind the scenes. I'm unclear on the implications of this for how I can deploy multiple services that use the API without any user interaction. I have successfully followed the OAuth2 example to get an authorization code using a browser, and then I can take that code and get a credential with an access and refresh token. Subsequently, I can create an OAuth2 credential from these 2 tokens, without using the browser to get a new authorization code. However, this doesn't work after some period of time -- I have to start over and get a new authorization code using the browser. I've seen reference to the CredentialsStore where you keep track of new access/refresh tokens as they change, which would be fine for a single service to manage. But with multiple services, would I need a centralized CredentialsStore that they would all share, so that each one gets the latest token? That's a non-starter for me. Is there something I'm missing about how I can use OAuth2 with multiple long-lived services? Otherwise I am going to continue with ClientLogin, and give up on my dream of non-expiring tokens. Or is there some way of re-obtaining an authorization token without user interaction? -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
Re: OAuth2 in the new Java client library
Excellent questions, and I hope someone can answer them soon. Do your servcies not access a shared database to store a common token to be used by all services? Oliver On Thursday, September 27, 2012 7:24:50 PM UTC+1, j.e.frank wrote: I'm looking at migrating to the new Java client library as part of the upgrade from v201109. One thing I thought was going to be a benefit of this migration was long-lived access tokens, to enable long-running services to use the API without having to worry about refreshing the ClientLogin token. Now that I've done some more digging, it appears that OAuth2 doesn't have long-lived tokens. Instead, you get an access token and a refresh token, and there is some way that an expired access token gets refreshed behind the scenes. I'm unclear on the implications of this for how I can deploy multiple services that use the API without any user interaction. I have successfully followed the OAuth2 example to get an authorization code using a browser, and then I can take that code and get a credential with an access and refresh token. Subsequently, I can create an OAuth2 credential from these 2 tokens, without using the browser to get a new authorization code. However, this doesn't work after some period of time -- I have to start over and get a new authorization code using the browser. I've seen reference to the CredentialsStore where you keep track of new access/refresh tokens as they change, which would be fine for a single service to manage. But with multiple services, would I need a centralized CredentialsStore that they would all share, so that each one gets the latest token? That's a non-starter for me. Is there something I'm missing about how I can use OAuth2 with multiple long-lived services? Otherwise I am going to continue with ClientLogin, and give up on my dream of non-expiring tokens. Or is there some way of re-obtaining an authorization token without user interaction? -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
Re: OAuth2 in the new Java client library
Most services do have a shared database, but not all of them. I continued investigating this issue, and I've also tried the Service Account approach which uses a private key instead of getting an authorization through a browser URL. However, this keeps giving me a bad grant exception if I try to actually use the credential, so I am not sure what I am doing wrong there. On Thursday, September 27, 2012 3:34:38 PM UTC-4, Oliver wrote: Excellent questions, and I hope someone can answer them soon. Do your servcies not access a shared database to store a common token to be used by all services? Oliver On Thursday, September 27, 2012 7:24:50 PM UTC+1, j.e.frank wrote: I'm looking at migrating to the new Java client library as part of the upgrade from v201109. One thing I thought was going to be a benefit of this migration was long-lived access tokens, to enable long-running services to use the API without having to worry about refreshing the ClientLogin token. Now that I've done some more digging, it appears that OAuth2 doesn't have long-lived tokens. Instead, you get an access token and a refresh token, and there is some way that an expired access token gets refreshed behind the scenes. I'm unclear on the implications of this for how I can deploy multiple services that use the API without any user interaction. I have successfully followed the OAuth2 example to get an authorization code using a browser, and then I can take that code and get a credential with an access and refresh token. Subsequently, I can create an OAuth2 credential from these 2 tokens, without using the browser to get a new authorization code. However, this doesn't work after some period of time -- I have to start over and get a new authorization code using the browser. I've seen reference to the CredentialsStore where you keep track of new access/refresh tokens as they change, which would be fine for a single service to manage. But with multiple services, would I need a centralized CredentialsStore that they would all share, so that each one gets the latest token? That's a non-starter for me. Is there something I'm missing about how I can use OAuth2 with multiple long-lived services? Otherwise I am going to continue with ClientLogin, and give up on my dream of non-expiring tokens. Or is there some way of re-obtaining an authorization token without user interaction? -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
UNEXPECTED_INTERNAL_API_ERROR with TargetingSettingDetail and AdGroup Service
I am submitting the following request to the sandbox: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8 ? env:Envelope xmlns:xsd=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema; xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance; xmlns:env=http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/; env:Header n1:RequestHeader env:mustUnderstand=0 xmlns:n1=https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201206; n1:authTokenxxx/n1:authToken n1:userAgentyyy/n1:userAgent n1:developerToken/n1:developerToken n1:clientCustomerIda/n1:clientCustomerId /n1:RequestHeader /env:Header env:Body n2:mutate xmlns:n2=https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201206; n2:operations xsi:type=n2:AdGroupOperation n2:operatorADD/n2:operator n2:operand n2:campaignId774762/n2:campaignId n2:namecampaign_adgroup-1:187:1629966937/n2:name n2:statusENABLED/n2:status n2:settings xsi:type=n2:TargetingSetting n2:details n2:targetAlltrue/n2:targetAll /n2:details /n2:settings n2:bids xsi:type=n2:ManualCPCAdGroupBids n2:keywordMaxCpc n2:amount xsi:type=n2:Money n2:microAmount43/n2:microAmount /n2:amount /n2:keywordMaxCpc n2:keywordContentMaxCpc n2:amount xsi:type=n2:Money n2:microAmount43/n2:microAmount /n2:amount /n2:keywordContentMaxCpc /n2:bids /n2:operand /n2:operations /n2:mutate /env:Body /env:Envelope and I am receiving an UNEXPECTED_INTERNAL_API_ERROR as the response. If i remove the targetingsettings, the error goes away. Any help would be appreciated. thank you, eric -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
Re: Can't specify an Adgroup Status selector on AdGroupCriterionService. Stuck for a solution.
One idea is, you can first get the list of AdGroups that are Active, using the AdGroupService. Then build a list of the IDs of those ad groups, and use it in the selector of the keywords (along with the Status predicate that picks only active keywords). On Thursday, September 27, 2012 12:26:09 PM UTC-4, Oliver wrote: We're trying to use the AdgroupCriterionService to get some information about *active *keywords only. We're using the 'Status' selector field to ensure only data for active keywords are returned. However, there are deleted Adgroups whose keywords are still in 'active' status. Adwords users typically just pause or delete an adgroup without having to change the status of each keyword inside it. As you can guess, the issue we now have is we're getting back data for these active keywords that are in the deleted adgroups! I can't see any selector field that we can use to filter by the Adgroup status as well. Any ideas how we can get round this issue please? Is there any other way we can target only the truly active keywords in the campaign? Thanks in advance for any help with this. Oliver -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
Re: Migrating Authorization Mechanics ClientLogin to OAuth2 Google AdWords v201206 Perl
It looks like I just needed to have the latest HTTP/Message.pmhttp://search.cpan.org/~gaas/HTTP-Message-6.03/lib/HTTP/Message.pm v6.0.3 module installed since the version I had installed did not have the method decode() which was being passed to the AUTOLOAD() subroutine in the HTTP/Message.pm module. -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
Is it OK to use the API for the TargetingIdeaService feature only?
Hello, I'd like to know if its ok to apply for an AdWords API if I only want to use the TargetingIdeaService? I want to develop an enhanced Keyword Research tool which add more metrics to the suggested keywords TargetingIdeaService provides to make a more informed and actionable decision if its worth targeting the keyword (for PPC and SEO). I went over the ToS of the API application, didn't see anything problematic with this concept, but I want to double check. Thanks, Roy -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
Re: Perl Client Library 2.7.0 and Authorization Handlers
It looks like I just needed to have the latest HTTP/Message.pmhttp://search.cpan.org/~gaas/HTTP-Message-6.03/lib/HTTP/Message.pm v6.0.3 module installed since the version I had installed did not have the method decode() which was being passed to the AUTOLOAD() subroutine in the HTTP/Message.pm module. So after initializing the Client object like you suggested then I stepped through the oauth2 perl example: http://code.google.com/p/google-api-adwords-perl/source/browse/trunk/examples/v201206/misc/use_oauth2.pl but the url returned from $auth_handler-get_authorization_url() is an invalid url: https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth?response_type=codeclient_id=client_idredirect_uri=urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oobscope=https%3A%2F%2Fadwords.google.com%2Fapi%2Fadwords%2Faccess_type=offlineapproval_prompt=autostate= where client_id is my client_id Is there something else that I am missing? -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
