Re: [AFMUG] SyncPipe question

[Forrest Christian (List Account)]

There's already one of these on the roadmap.  Unit which will sync two
radios.
On Mar 27, 2016 11:37 AM, "George Skorup"  wrote:

> Woulda been nice. Oh well.
>
> This I think is another good example for a UGPS-like SyncPipe. Could I
> send a climber up to take the Parasitic pipe out and then throw on a
> SyncInjector at the bottom... sure. Burning a GigE SyncInjector for a 1 AP
> site though.
>
> On 3/26/2016 6:42 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
>
> I wouldn't recommend this.   Mainly because it's going to unbalance the
> gigabit ethernet pairs and likely cause ethernet errors as the power
> consumption changes.
> On Mar 26, 2016 7:15 AM, "George Skorup"  wrote:
>
>> Dumb question, probably best answered by Forrest. Say I have one of the
>> newer universal Parasitic SyncPipes. Newer meaning Rev G+. Universal
>> meaning you can use them on standard Canopy 30VDC POE and the stupid
>> 320/430 pinout, since they tap only the two power pins that don't change.
>> OK, so now say I take a GigE injector and configure a 450 AP to negotiate
>> 1000BaseT. Will GigE work... "through" the Parasitic pipe? I know the
>> 10/100 data pairs are passed straight through. Not sure about the other two
>> pairs. Since it taps only two pins for power, I doubt there's any bonding
>> going on.
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] testing this out

[David Milholen]

ok,
 looks good

On 3/27/2016 10:50 AM, David Milholen wrote:


--


--

Re: [AFMUG] testing this out

[David Milholen]

ok looks good


On 3/27/2016 10:50 AM, David Milholen wrote:


--


--

[AFMUG] testing this out

[David Milholen]

--