Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 PTP450
I am going to assume that is a 5Mhz wide channel? this is about what we would expect but I see double that in a 10mhz wide channel. We love our 3.65 in our area. We are using everything stock on most of our deployments and installs. On 2/3/2015 1:55 PM, That One Guy wrote: 9 miles and some change with an sm/reflector from the stock sector with output power turned down to match the loss from when we split it Downlink Status Receive Power Level : -75.5 (-77.8 B / -79.4 A) dBm Signal Strength Ratio : 1.6 dB B - A Signal to Noise Ratio : 16 B / 19 A dB Receive Fragments Modulation : Path B:QPSK:70% 16-QAM:29% Path A:QPSK:54% 16-QAM:44% 64-QAM:1% Latest Remote Link Test Efficiency Percentage : NA % BER Total Avg Results : 2.965999e-04 Uplink Status Power Level : -67.5 (-70.0 B / -71.0 A) dBm Signal Strength Ratio : 4.0 dB B - A Signal to Noise Ratio : 25 dB B / 26 dB A Latest Remote Link Test Efficiency Percentage : NA % Local Status Session Status : REGISTERED VC 19 Rate 8X/4X Latest Local Link Test Results Stats for LUID: 3 Test Duration: 2 Pkt Length: 1714 *Link Test with Bridging and MIR* VC DownlinkUplink Aggregate Packet Transmit Packet Receive Actual Actual 19 11149056 bps (11.15 Mbps)4562176 bps (4.56 Mbps) 15711232 bps (15.71 Mbps, 1104 pps) 627 (313 pps) 1582(791 pps) *Efficiency* DownlinkUplink Efficiency Fragments count Signal to Noise Ratio Efficiency Fragments count Signal to Noise Ratio Actual ExpectedActual Expected 85% 50924 43551 17 dB B 22 dB A 79% 22392 17821 20 dB B 20 dB A * Link Quality Downlink * RF Path Modulation Fragments Modulation Percentage Average Corrected Bit Errors B QPSK16205 84% 0.871 B 16-QAM 316216% 3.713 A QPSK18110 77% 0.145 A 16-QAM 523722% 0.480 *Uplink * RF Path Modulation Fragments Modulation Percentage Average Corrected Bit Errors B QPSK421250% 1.059 B 16-QAM 421250% 1.059 A QPSK425250% 0.929 A 16-QAM 425350% 0.878 *Currently transmitting at:* VC 19 Rate 8X/4X On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Dan Petermann d...@wyoming.com mailto:d...@wyoming.com wrote: What kind of distance are you guys seeing for a LOS shot on 3.65? What antennas are you using to get that distance. I need 10Mbs aggregate. -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 --
[AFMUG] 3.65 PTP450
What kind of distance are you guys seeing for a LOS shot on 3.65? What antennas are you using to get that distance. I need 10Mbs aggregate.
Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 PTP450
Los 10 megs? Ubnt... On Feb 3, 2015 2:41 PM, Dan Petermann d...@wyoming.com wrote: What kind of distance are you guys seeing for a LOS shot on 3.65? What antennas are you using to get that distance. I need 10Mbs aggregate.
Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 PTP450
9 miles and some change with an sm/reflector from the stock sector with output power turned down to match the loss from when we split it Downlink StatusReceive Power Level : -75.5 (-77.8 B / -79.4 A) dBm Signal Strength Ratio : 1.6 dB B - A Signal to Noise Ratio : 16 B / 19 A dB Receive Fragments Modulation : Path B:QPSK:70% 16-QAM:29% Path A:QPSK:54% 16-QAM:44% 64-QAM:1% Latest Remote Link Test Efficiency Percentage : NA % BER Total Avg Results : 2.965999e-04 Uplink StatusPower Level : -67.5 (-70.0 B / -71.0 A) dBm Signal Strength Ratio : 4.0 dB B - A Signal to Noise Ratio : 25 dB B / 26 dB A Latest Remote Link Test Efficiency Percentage : NA % Local StatusSession Status : REGISTERED VC 19 Rate 8X/4X Latest Local Link Test Results Stats for LUID: 3 Test Duration: 2 Pkt Length: 1714 *Link Test with Bridging and MIR* VCDownlinkUplinkAggregatePacket TransmitPacket ReceiveActualActual1911149056 bps (11.15 Mbps)4562176 bps (4.56 Mbps)15711232 bps (15.71 Mbps, 1104 pps)627 (313 pps)1582(791 pps) *Efficiency* DownlinkUplinkEfficiencyFragments countSignal to Noise RatioEfficiencyFragments countSignal to Noise RatioActualExpectedActualExpected85%509244355117 dB B 22 dB A79%223921782120 dB B 20 dB A *Link Quality Downlink*RF PathModulationFragmentsModulation PercentageAverage Corrected Bit ErrorsBQPSK1620584%0.871B16-QAM316216%3.713AQPSK1811077%0.145A16-QAM5237 22%0.480 *Uplink*RF PathModulationFragmentsModulation PercentageAverage Corrected Bit ErrorsBQPSK421250%1.059B16-QAM421250%1.059AQPSK425250%0.929A16-QAM4253 50%0.878 *Currently transmitting at:*VC 19 Rate 8X/4X On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Dan Petermann d...@wyoming.com wrote: What kind of distance are you guys seeing for a LOS shot on 3.65? What antennas are you using to get that distance. I need 10Mbs aggregate. -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 PTP450
Thank you! Just what I needed. On Feb 3, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Adam Moffett dmmoff...@gmail.com wrote: You'll get a little more out of it with the WB SL reflector 9 miles and some change with an sm/reflector from the stock sector with output power turned down to match the loss from when we split it Downlink Status Receive Power Level : -75.5 (-77.8 B / -79.4 A) dBm Signal Strength Ratio : 1.6 dB B - A Signal to Noise Ratio : 16 B / 19 A dB Receive Fragments Modulation : Path B:QPSK:70% 16-QAM:29% Path A:QPSK:54% 16-QAM:44% 64-QAM:1% Latest Remote Link Test Efficiency Percentage : NA % BER Total Avg Results : 2.965999e-04 Uplink Status Power Level : -67.5 (-70.0 B / -71.0 A) dBm Signal Strength Ratio : 4.0 dB B - A Signal to Noise Ratio : 25 dB B / 26 dB A Latest Remote Link Test Efficiency Percentage : NA % Local Status Session Status : REGISTERED VC 19 Rate 8X/4X Latest Local Link Test Results Stats for LUID: 3 Test Duration: 2 Pkt Length: 1714 Link Test with Bridging and MIR VC DownlinkUplink Aggregate Packet Transmit Packet Receive Actual Actual 19 11149056 bps (11.15 Mbps) 4562176 bps (4.56 Mbps) 15711232 bps (15.71 Mbps, 1104 pps) 627 (313 pps) 1582(791 pps) Efficiency Downlink Uplink Efficiency Fragments countSignal to Noise Ratio Efficiency Fragments countSignal to Noise Ratio Actual ExpectedActual Expected 85% 50924 43551 17 dB B 22 dB A 79% 22392 17821 20 dB B 20 dB A Link Quality Downlink RF Path Modulation Fragments Modulation Percentage Average Corrected Bit Errors BQPSK16205 84% 0.871 B16-QAM 316216% 3.713 AQPSK18110 77% 0.145 A16-QAM 523722% 0.480Uplink RF Path Modulation Fragments Modulation Percentage Average Corrected Bit Errors BQPSK421250% 1.059 B16-QAM 421250% 1.059 AQPSK425250% 0.929 A16-QAM 425350% 0.878 Currently transmitting at: VC 19 Rate 8X/4X On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Dan Petermann d...@wyoming.com wrote: What kind of distance are you guys seeing for a LOS shot on 3.65? What antennas are you using to get that distance. I need 10Mbs aggregate. -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 PTP450
You'll get a little more out of it with the WB SL reflector 9 miles and some change with an sm/reflector from the stock sector with output power turned down to match the loss from when we split it Downlink Status Receive Power Level : -75.5 (-77.8 B / -79.4 A) dBm Signal Strength Ratio : 1.6 dB B - A Signal to Noise Ratio : 16 B / 19 A dB Receive Fragments Modulation : Path B:QPSK:70% 16-QAM:29% Path A:QPSK:54% 16-QAM:44% 64-QAM:1% Latest Remote Link Test Efficiency Percentage : NA % BER Total Avg Results : 2.965999e-04 Uplink Status Power Level : -67.5 (-70.0 B / -71.0 A) dBm Signal Strength Ratio : 4.0 dB B - A Signal to Noise Ratio : 25 dB B / 26 dB A Latest Remote Link Test Efficiency Percentage : NA % Local Status Session Status : REGISTERED VC 19 Rate 8X/4X Latest Local Link Test Results Stats for LUID: 3 Test Duration: 2 Pkt Length: 1714 *Link Test with Bridging and MIR* VC DownlinkUplink Aggregate Packet Transmit Packet Receive Actual Actual 19 11149056 bps (11.15 Mbps)4562176 bps (4.56 Mbps) 15711232 bps (15.71 Mbps, 1104 pps) 627 (313 pps) 1582(791 pps) *Efficiency* DownlinkUplink Efficiency Fragments count Signal to Noise Ratio Efficiency Fragments count Signal to Noise Ratio Actual ExpectedActual Expected 85% 50924 43551 17 dB B 22 dB A 79% 22392 17821 20 dB B 20 dB A * Link Quality Downlink * RF Path Modulation Fragments Modulation Percentage Average Corrected Bit Errors B QPSK16205 84% 0.871 B 16-QAM 316216% 3.713 A QPSK18110 77% 0.145 A 16-QAM 523722% 0.480 *Uplink * RF Path Modulation Fragments Modulation Percentage Average Corrected Bit Errors B QPSK421250% 1.059 B 16-QAM 421250% 1.059 A QPSK425250% 0.929 A 16-QAM 425350% 0.878 *Currently transmitting at:* VC 19 Rate 8X/4X On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Dan Petermann d...@wyoming.com mailto:d...@wyoming.com wrote: What kind of distance are you guys seeing for a LOS shot on 3.65? What antennas are you using to get that distance. I need 10Mbs aggregate. -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 PTP450
-71 @ 18 miles. 45.79Mb/s down, 11Mb up. AP has the Cambium antenna, SM has a reflector. On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Dan Petermann d...@wyoming.com wrote: Thank you! Just what I needed. On Feb 3, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Adam Moffett dmmoff...@gmail.com wrote: You'll get a little more out of it with the WB SL reflector 9 miles and some change with an sm/reflector from the stock sector with output power turned down to match the loss from when we split it Downlink Status Receive Power Level : -75.5 (-77.8 B / -79.4 A) dBm Signal Strength Ratio : 1.6 dB B - A Signal to Noise Ratio : 16 B / 19 A dB Receive Fragments Modulation : Path B:QPSK:70% 16-QAM:29% Path A:QPSK:54% 16-QAM:44% 64-QAM:1% Latest Remote Link Test Efficiency Percentage : NA % BER Total Avg Results : 2.965999e-04 Uplink Status Power Level : -67.5 (-70.0 B / -71.0 A) dBm Signal Strength Ratio : 4.0 dB B - A Signal to Noise Ratio : 25 dB B / 26 dB A Latest Remote Link Test Efficiency Percentage : NA % Local Status Session Status : REGISTERED VC 19 Rate 8X/4X Latest Local Link Test Results Stats for LUID: 3 Test Duration: 2 Pkt Length: 1714 *Link Test with Bridging and MIR* VC Downlink Uplink Aggregate Packet Transmit Packet Receive Actual Actual 19 11149056 bps (11.15 Mbps) 4562176 bps (4.56 Mbps) 15711232 bps (15.71 Mbps, 1104 pps) 627 (313 pps) 1582(791 pps) *Efficiency* Downlink Uplink Efficiency Fragments count Signal to Noise Ratio Efficiency Fragments count Signal to Noise Ratio Actual Expected Actual Expected 85% 50924 43551 17 dB B 22 dB A 79% 22392 17821 20 dB B 20 dB A * Link Quality Downlink * RF Path Modulation Fragments Modulation Percentage Average Corrected Bit Errors B QPSK 16205 84% 0.871 B 16-QAM 3162 16% 3.713 A QPSK 18110 77% 0.145 A 16-QAM 5237 22% 0.480 *Uplink * RF Path Modulation Fragments Modulation Percentage Average Corrected Bit Errors B QPSK 4212 50% 1.059 B 16-QAM 4212 50% 1.059 A QPSK 4252 50% 0.929 A 16-QAM 4253 50% 0.878 *Currently transmitting at:* VC 19 Rate 8X/4X On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Dan Petermann d...@wyoming.com wrote: What kind of distance are you guys seeing for a LOS shot on 3.65? What antennas are you using to get that distance. I need 10Mbs aggregate. -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 PTP450
oh sorry you were looking for PTP not PMP. Ignore! On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Ryan Ray ryan...@gmail.com wrote: -71 @ 18 miles. 45.79Mb/s down, 11Mb up. AP has the Cambium antenna, SM has a reflector. On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Dan Petermann d...@wyoming.com wrote: Thank you! Just what I needed. On Feb 3, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Adam Moffett dmmoff...@gmail.com wrote: You'll get a little more out of it with the WB SL reflector 9 miles and some change with an sm/reflector from the stock sector with output power turned down to match the loss from when we split it Downlink Status Receive Power Level : -75.5 (-77.8 B / -79.4 A) dBm Signal Strength Ratio : 1.6 dB B - A Signal to Noise Ratio : 16 B / 19 A dB Receive Fragments Modulation : Path B:QPSK:70% 16-QAM:29% Path A:QPSK:54% 16-QAM:44% 64-QAM:1% Latest Remote Link Test Efficiency Percentage : NA % BER Total Avg Results : 2.965999e-04 Uplink Status Power Level : -67.5 (-70.0 B / -71.0 A) dBm Signal Strength Ratio : 4.0 dB B - A Signal to Noise Ratio : 25 dB B / 26 dB A Latest Remote Link Test Efficiency Percentage : NA % Local Status Session Status : REGISTERED VC 19 Rate 8X/4X Latest Local Link Test Results Stats for LUID: 3 Test Duration: 2 Pkt Length: 1714 *Link Test with Bridging and MIR* VC Downlink Uplink Aggregate Packet Transmit Packet Receive Actual Actual 19 11149056 bps (11.15 Mbps) 4562176 bps (4.56 Mbps) 15711232 bps (15.71 Mbps, 1104 pps) 627 (313 pps) 1582(791 pps) *Efficiency* Downlink Uplink Efficiency Fragments count Signal to Noise Ratio Efficiency Fragments count Signal to Noise Ratio Actual Expected Actual Expected 85% 50924 43551 17 dB B 22 dB A 79% 22392 17821 20 dB B 20 dB A * Link Quality Downlink * RF Path Modulation Fragments Modulation Percentage Average Corrected Bit Errors B QPSK 16205 84% 0.871 B 16-QAM 3162 16% 3.713 A QPSK 18110 77% 0.145 A 16-QAM 5237 22% 0.480 *Uplink * RF Path Modulation Fragments Modulation Percentage Average Corrected Bit Errors B QPSK 4212 50% 1.059 B 16-QAM 4212 50% 1.059 A QPSK 4252 50% 0.929 A 16-QAM 4253 50% 0.878 *Currently transmitting at:* VC 19 Rate 8X/4X On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Dan Petermann d...@wyoming.com wrote: What kind of distance are you guys seeing for a LOS shot on 3.65? What antennas are you using to get that distance. I need 10Mbs aggregate. -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
