I thought that when you included someone else's AS-set in your AS-set, it formed a chain of custody, not that their AS-set directly contained your AS.
I've found multiple AS-sets that directly include my AS instead of a chain of AS-sets. I suspect they're pulling all of the members of the AS-sets they're peering with and building it as their own. I assume that what they're doing isn't right. Can anyone smarter on the subject than I shed some light? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP
