Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld
Good info, thanks. I suppose I've heard some of that. I didn't know anything about the exclusive/reserved licensing option, however. On Saturday, March 28, 2015, Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net wrote: https://www.dropbox.com/s/96rxvh3wq1e90db/2014-06-13%2013.30%203550-3700%20MHz_%20The%20FCC_s%20Proposal.wmv?dl=0 - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -- *From: *Jason McKemie j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com'); *To: *af@afmug.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com'); *Sent: *Saturday, March 28, 2015 10:25:00 AM *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld Is incumbent access like homesteading? If so, what are the requirements? Suggested reading? I'm a bit concerned, as an incompetent operator around here is all over this band and really just thinks it belongs to them - not good news if it actually soon will. On Saturday, March 28, 2015, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ch...@shelbybb.com'); wrote: Steve posted this to the WISPA Members list... I think that issue has already been decided. From what I hear (from a very good source), the FCC will adopt rules for the 3550-3700 MHz band that will incorporate, by and large, the three-tier regulatory scheme (Incumbent Access, Priority Access and General Authorized Access (GAA)) with short term Priority Access Licenses (PALs). There will be no PALs in the 3650-3700 MHz band, which will be GAA only, to prevent carriers from bidding on these areas and harming existing users. Non-exclusive access to 3650-3700 MHz spectrum will be through the automated Spectrum Access System (SAS). Unless things change, the FCC will adopt the rules and the further notice of proposed rulemaking (FNPRM) at the April 17 meeting. Not sure about this, but I am guessing that the FNPRM will ask for comment on (1) NTIA’s proposal regarding the size of exclusion zones per its ex parte letter filed earlier this week, (2) competitive bidding procedures for PALs, and/or (3) SAS requirements. We will try to learn more in the next few weeks, and will also look to emphasize WISPA’s positions. Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote: Also, unbid PALs in tracts will go to GAA. Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote: So here's what we've been advocating for a while. -Some set of spectrum for GAA (General Access Availability, like unlicensed) -Make it so no one company can buy all the PALs (Preferred Access Licensee) -Keep the tracts small enough so that we can use them in areas and apply for PALs at a decent price Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Jason McKemie j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com wrote: The FCC would auction off licenses to service providers - this sounds bad. On Friday, March 27, 2015, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2903472/fcc-will-vote-next-month-on-plan-to-share-valuable-35ghz-spectrum.html Jaime Solorza
Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld
So here's what we've been advocating for a while. -Some set of spectrum for GAA (General Access Availability, like unlicensed) -Make it so no one company can buy all the PALs (Preferred Access Licensee) -Keep the tracts small enough so that we can use them in areas and apply for PALs at a decent price Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Jason McKemie j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com wrote: The FCC would auction off licenses to service providers - this sounds bad. On Friday, March 27, 2015, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2903472/fcc-will-vote-next-month-on-plan-to-share-valuable-35ghz-spectrum.html Jaime Solorza
Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld
Also, unbid PALs in tracts will go to GAA. Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote: So here's what we've been advocating for a while. -Some set of spectrum for GAA (General Access Availability, like unlicensed) -Make it so no one company can buy all the PALs (Preferred Access Licensee) -Keep the tracts small enough so that we can use them in areas and apply for PALs at a decent price Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Jason McKemie j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com wrote: The FCC would auction off licenses to service providers - this sounds bad. On Friday, March 27, 2015, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2903472/fcc-will-vote-next-month-on-plan-to-share-valuable-35ghz-spectrum.html Jaime Solorza
Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld
Seriously, how do you not know what's been going on in 3550 for the last few years? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Jason McKemie j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 2:17:15 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld Maybe not. Typically FCC and auction doesn't fall within my budget though. I was hoping they would just extend the 3650 rules to cover more spectrum. On Friday, March 27, 2015, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote: May not be as bad as you’re thinking. From: Jason McKemie Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 11:22 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld The FCC would auction off licenses to service providers - this sounds bad. On Friday, March 27, 2015, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: blockquote http://www.pcworld.com/article/2903472/fcc-will-vote-next-month-on-plan-to-share-valuable-35ghz-spectrum.html Jaime Solorza /blockquote
Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld
Is incumbent access like homesteading? If so, what are the requirements? Suggested reading? I'm a bit concerned, as an incompetent operator around here is all over this band and really just thinks it belongs to them - not good news if it actually soon will. On Saturday, March 28, 2015, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote: Steve posted this to the WISPA Members list... I think that issue has already been decided. From what I hear (from a very good source), the FCC will adopt rules for the 3550-3700 MHz band that will incorporate, by and large, the three-tier regulatory scheme (Incumbent Access, Priority Access and General Authorized Access (GAA)) with short term Priority Access Licenses (PALs). There will be no PALs in the 3650-3700 MHz band, which will be GAA only, to prevent carriers from bidding on these areas and harming existing users. Non-exclusive access to 3650-3700 MHz spectrum will be through the automated Spectrum Access System (SAS). Unless things change, the FCC will adopt the rules and the further notice of proposed rulemaking (FNPRM) at the April 17 meeting. Not sure about this, but I am guessing that the FNPRM will ask for comment on (1) NTIA’s proposal regarding the size of exclusion zones per its ex parte letter filed earlier this week, (2) competitive bidding procedures for PALs, and/or (3) SAS requirements. We will try to learn more in the next few weeks, and will also look to emphasize WISPA’s positions. Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ch...@shelbybb.com'); wrote: Also, unbid PALs in tracts will go to GAA. Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ch...@shelbybb.com'); wrote: So here's what we've been advocating for a while. -Some set of spectrum for GAA (General Access Availability, like unlicensed) -Make it so no one company can buy all the PALs (Preferred Access Licensee) -Keep the tracts small enough so that we can use them in areas and apply for PALs at a decent price Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Jason McKemie j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com'); wrote: The FCC would auction off licenses to service providers - this sounds bad. On Friday, March 27, 2015, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','losguyswirel...@gmail.com'); wrote: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2903472/fcc-will-vote-next-month-on-plan-to-share-valuable-35ghz-spectrum.html Jaime Solorza
Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld
https://www.dropbox.com/s/96rxvh3wq1e90db/2014-06-13%2013.30%203550-3700%20MHz_%20The%20FCC_s%20Proposal.wmv?dl=0 - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Jason McKemie j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 10:25:00 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld Is incumbent access like homesteading? If so, what are the requirements? Suggested reading? I'm a bit concerned, as an incompetent operator around here is all over this band and really just thinks it belongs to them - not good news if it actually soon will. On Saturday, March 28, 2015, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote: Steve posted this to the WISPA Members list... I think that issue has already been decided. From what I hear (from a very good source), the FCC will adopt rules for the 3550-3700 MHz band that will incorporate, by and large, the three-tier regulatory scheme (Incumbent Access, Priority Access and General Authorized Access (GAA)) with short term Priority Access Licenses (PALs). There will be no PALs in the 3650-3700 MHz band, which will be GAA only, to prevent carriers from bidding on these areas and harming existing users. Non-exclusive access to 3650-3700 MHz spectrum will be through the automated Spectrum Access System (SAS). Unless things change, the FCC will adopt the rules and the further notice of proposed rulemaking (FNPRM) at the April 17 meeting. Not sure about this, but I am guessing that the FNPRM will ask for comment on (1) NTIA’s proposal regarding the size of exclusion zones per its ex parte letter filed earlier this week, (2) competitive bidding procedures for PALs, and/or (3) SAS requirements. We will try to learn more in the next few weeks, and will also look to emphasize WISPA’s positions. Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote: blockquote Also, unbid PALs in tracts will go to GAA. Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote: blockquote So here's what we've been advocating for a while. -Some set of spectrum for GAA (General Access Availability, like unlicensed) -Make it so no one company can buy all the PALs (Preferred Access Licensee) -Keep the tracts small enough so that we can use them in areas and apply for PALs at a decent price Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Jason McKemie j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com wrote: blockquote The FCC would auction off licenses to service providers - this sounds bad. On Friday, March 27, 2015, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: blockquote http://www.pcworld.com/article/2903472/fcc-will-vote-next-month-on-plan-to-share-valuable-35ghz-spectrum.html Jaime Solorza /blockquote /blockquote /blockquote /blockquote
Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld
No, that’s not what incumbent means in this case. It means federal radar and grandfathered satellite earth stations. Same thing as when you are currently registering a 3650 location, if it falls within a protected area around an earth station, you need their permission. http://www.fcc.gov/rulemaking/12-148 From: Jason McKemie Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 10:25 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld Is incumbent access like homesteading? If so, what are the requirements? Suggested reading? I'm a bit concerned, as an incompetent operator around here is all over this band and really just thinks it belongs to them - not good news if it actually soon will. On Saturday, March 28, 2015, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote: Steve posted this to the WISPA Members list... I think that issue has already been decided. From what I hear (from a very good source), the FCC will adopt rules for the 3550-3700 MHz band that will incorporate, by and large, the three-tier regulatory scheme (Incumbent Access, Priority Access and General Authorized Access (GAA)) with short term Priority Access Licenses (PALs). There will be no PALs in the 3650-3700 MHz band, which will be GAA only, to prevent carriers from bidding on these areas and harming existing users. Non-exclusive access to 3650-3700 MHz spectrum will be through the automated Spectrum Access System (SAS). Unless things change, the FCC will adopt the rules and the further notice of proposed rulemaking (FNPRM) at the April 17 meeting. Not sure about this, but I am guessing that the FNPRM will ask for comment on (1) NTIA’s proposal regarding the size of exclusion zones per its ex parte letter filed earlier this week, (2) competitive bidding procedures for PALs, and/or (3) SAS requirements. We will try to learn more in the next few weeks, and will also look to emphasize WISPA’s positions. Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Chuck Hogg javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ch...@shelbybb.com'); wrote: Also, unbid PALs in tracts will go to GAA. Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Chuck Hogg javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ch...@shelbybb.com'); wrote: So here's what we've been advocating for a while. -Some set of spectrum for GAA (General Access Availability, like unlicensed) -Make it so no one company can buy all the PALs (Preferred Access Licensee) -Keep the tracts small enough so that we can use them in areas and apply for PALs at a decent price Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Jason McKemie javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com'); wrote: The FCC would auction off licenses to service providers - this sounds bad. On Friday, March 27, 2015, Jaime Solorza javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','losguyswirel...@gmail.com'); wrote: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2903472/fcc-will-vote-next-month-on-plan-to-share-valuable-35ghz-spectrum.html Jaime Solorza
Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld
Steve posted this to the WISPA Members list... I think that issue has already been decided. From what I hear (from a very good source), the FCC will adopt rules for the 3550-3700 MHz band that will incorporate, by and large, the three-tier regulatory scheme (Incumbent Access, Priority Access and General Authorized Access (GAA)) with short term Priority Access Licenses (PALs). There will be no PALs in the 3650-3700 MHz band, which will be GAA only, to prevent carriers from bidding on these areas and harming existing users. Non-exclusive access to 3650-3700 MHz spectrum will be through the automated Spectrum Access System (SAS). Unless things change, the FCC will adopt the rules and the further notice of proposed rulemaking (FNPRM) at the April 17 meeting. Not sure about this, but I am guessing that the FNPRM will ask for comment on (1) NTIA’s proposal regarding the size of exclusion zones per its ex parte letter filed earlier this week, (2) competitive bidding procedures for PALs, and/or (3) SAS requirements. We will try to learn more in the next few weeks, and will also look to emphasize WISPA’s positions. Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote: Also, unbid PALs in tracts will go to GAA. Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote: So here's what we've been advocating for a while. -Some set of spectrum for GAA (General Access Availability, like unlicensed) -Make it so no one company can buy all the PALs (Preferred Access Licensee) -Keep the tracts small enough so that we can use them in areas and apply for PALs at a decent price Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Jason McKemie j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com wrote: The FCC would auction off licenses to service providers - this sounds bad. On Friday, March 27, 2015, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2903472/fcc-will-vote-next-month-on-plan-to-share-valuable-35ghz-spectrum.html Jaime Solorza
Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld
Got it, thanks. On Saturday, March 28, 2015, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote: No, that’s not what incumbent means in this case. It means federal radar and grandfathered satellite earth stations. Same thing as when you are currently registering a 3650 location, if it falls within a protected area around an earth station, you need their permission. http://www.fcc.gov/rulemaking/12-148 *From:* Jason McKemie javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com'); *Sent:* Saturday, March 28, 2015 10:25 AM *To:* af@afmug.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com'); *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld Is incumbent access like homesteading? If so, what are the requirements? Suggested reading? I'm a bit concerned, as an incompetent operator around here is all over this band and really just thinks it belongs to them - not good news if it actually soon will. On Saturday, March 28, 2015, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ch...@shelbybb.com'); wrote: Steve posted this to the WISPA Members list... I think that issue has already been decided. From what I hear (from a very good source), the FCC will adopt rules for the 3550-3700 MHz band that will incorporate, by and large, the three-tier regulatory scheme (Incumbent Access, Priority Access and General Authorized Access (GAA)) with short term Priority Access Licenses (PALs). There will be no PALs in the 3650-3700 MHz band, which will be GAA only, to prevent carriers from bidding on these areas and harming existing users. Non-exclusive access to 3650-3700 MHz spectrum will be through the automated Spectrum Access System (SAS). Unless things change, the FCC will adopt the rules and the further notice of proposed rulemaking (FNPRM) at the April 17 meeting. Not sure about this, but I am guessing that the FNPRM will ask for comment on (1) NTIA’s proposal regarding the size of exclusion zones per its ex parte letter filed earlier this week, (2) competitive bidding procedures for PALs, and/or (3) SAS requirements. We will try to learn more in the next few weeks, and will also look to emphasize WISPA’s positions. Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Chuck Hogg javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ch...@shelbybb.com'); wrote: Also, unbid PALs in tracts will go to GAA. Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Chuck Hogg javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ch...@shelbybb.com'); wrote: So here's what we've been advocating for a while. -Some set of spectrum for GAA (General Access Availability, like unlicensed) -Make it so no one company can buy all the PALs (Preferred Access Licensee) -Keep the tracts small enough so that we can use them in areas and apply for PALs at a decent price Regards, Chuck On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Jason McKemie javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com'); wrote: The FCC would auction off licenses to service providers - this sounds bad. On Friday, March 27, 2015, Jaime Solorza javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','losguyswirel...@gmail.com'); wrote: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2903472/fcc-will-vote-next-month-on-plan-to-share-valuable-35ghz-spectrum.html Jaime Solorza
Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld
Maybe not. Typically FCC and auction doesn't fall within my budget though. I was hoping they would just extend the 3650 rules to cover more spectrum. On Friday, March 27, 2015, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote: May not be as bad as you’re thinking. *From:* Jason McKemie javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com'); *Sent:* Friday, March 27, 2015 11:22 PM *To:* af@afmug.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com'); *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld The FCC would auction off licenses to service providers - this sounds bad. On Friday, March 27, 2015, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','losguyswirel...@gmail.com'); wrote: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2903472/fcc-will-vote-next-month-on-plan-to-share-valuable-35ghz-spectrum.html Jaime Solorza
[AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2903472/fcc-will-vote-next-month-on-plan-to-share-valuable-35ghz-spectrum.html Jaime Solorza
Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld
Was running SA earlier today with a wideband antenna 800-2700 mhz at site. .nothing absolutely nothing from 971 to 1320Mhz. .. nothing from 2245 to 2350..then lots from there to 2700...I will try this again from a higher location. Just curious Jaime Solorza On Mar 27, 2015 10:51 PM, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote: May not be as bad as you’re thinking. *From:* Jason McKemie j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com *Sent:* Friday, March 27, 2015 11:22 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld The FCC would auction off licenses to service providers - this sounds bad. On Friday, March 27, 2015, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2903472/fcc-will-vote-next-month-on-plan-to-share-valuable-35ghz-spectrum.html Jaime Solorza
Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld
Was running SA earlier today with a wideband antenna 800-2700 mhz at site. .nothing absolutely nothing from 971 to 1320Mhz. .. nothing from 2245 to 2350..then lots from there to 2700...I will try this again from a higher location. Just curious Jaime Solorza On Mar 27, 2015 10:51 PM, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote: May not be as bad as you’re thinking. *From:* Jason McKemie j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com *Sent:* Friday, March 27, 2015 11:22 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld The FCC would auction off licenses to service providers - this sounds bad. On Friday, March 27, 2015, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2903472/fcc-will-vote-next-month-on-plan-to-share-valuable-35ghz-spectrum.html Jaime Solorza
Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld
The FCC would auction off licenses to service providers - this sounds bad. On Friday, March 27, 2015, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2903472/fcc-will-vote-next-month-on-plan-to-share-valuable-35ghz-spectrum.html Jaime Solorza
Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld
May not be as bad as you’re thinking. From: Jason McKemie Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 11:22 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC will vote next month on plan to share valuable 3.5GHz spectrum | PCWorld The FCC would auction off licenses to service providers - this sounds bad. On Friday, March 27, 2015, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2903472/fcc-will-vote-next-month-on-plan-to-share-valuable-35ghz-spectrum.html Jaime Solorza
