[AFMUG] Fwd: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment

[Colin Stanners]

Fancy new ePMP...

-- Forwarded message --
From: FCC ID Alert 
Date: Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:30 AM
Subject: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment
To: cstann...@gmail.com


A new FCC ID application has been submitted by Cambium Networks Inc. for
New Equipment.
See FCC ID Z8H89FT0017

Equipment Authorized: Force 300 Fixed Transceiver

[AFMUG] Fwd: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment

[Colin Stanners]

-- Forwarded message --
From: "FCC ID Alert" 
Date: Aug 30, 2017 7:30 AM
Subject: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment
To: "FCC ID Alert" 
Cc:

A new FCC ID application has been submitted by Cambium Networks Inc. for
New Equipment.
See FCC ID Z8H89FT0031

Equipment Authorized: ePMP Force 190 Transceiver

unsubscribe

[AFMUG] Fwd: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment

[Colin Stanners]

PTP550


-- Forwarded message --
From: FCC ID Alert 
Date: Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 2:30 AM
Subject: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment
To: cstann...@gmail.com


A new FCC ID application has been submitted by Cambium Networks Inc. for
New Equipment.
See FCC ID Z8H89FT0038

Equipment Authorized: PTP550 Fixed Transceiver

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment

[Josh Luthman]

Uhm I think the Force 190 is showing up at distributors at this point?
It's cheaper and 3db less than the Force 200.  A good gap between 180 and
190, but I still suggest Force 200.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Colin Stanners  wrote:

> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "FCC ID Alert" 
> Date: Aug 30, 2017 7:30 AM
> Subject: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment
> To: "FCC ID Alert" 
> Cc:
>
> A new FCC ID application has been submitted by Cambium Networks Inc. for
> New Equipment.
> See FCC ID Z8H89FT0031
> 
> Equipment Authorized: ePMP Force 190 Transceiver
>
> unsubscribe
> 
>

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment

[Mathew Howard]

Yup... it's existence has been public for awhile... and this reminds me, I
need to order some.

The neat thing about the Force 190 is that it comes in the same size box as
the Force 180. I still expect to use Force 200s most of the time, but there
are a lot of cases where the 180 isn't quite enough where these should be a
good fit.

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> Uhm I think the Force 190 is showing up at distributors at this point?
> It's cheaper and 3db less than the Force 200.  A good gap between 180 and
> 190, but I still suggest Force 200.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Colin Stanners 
> wrote:
>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: "FCC ID Alert" 
>> Date: Aug 30, 2017 7:30 AM
>> Subject: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment
>> To: "FCC ID Alert" 
>> Cc:
>>
>> A new FCC ID application has been submitted by Cambium Networks Inc. for
>> New Equipment.
>> See FCC ID Z8H89FT0031
>> 
>> Equipment Authorized: ePMP Force 190 Transceiver
>>
>> unsubscribe
>> 
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment

[Jeff Broadwick - Lists]

Will ship from Asia around Oct. 1st.

Jeff Broadwick
ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@converge-tech.com

> On Aug 30, 2017, at 1:05 PM, Mathew Howard  wrote:
> 
> Yup... it's existence has been public for awhile... and this reminds me, I 
> need to order some.
> 
> The neat thing about the Force 190 is that it comes in the same size box as 
> the Force 180. I still expect to use Force 200s most of the time, but there 
> are a lot of cases where the 180 isn't quite enough where these should be a 
> good fit.
> 
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Josh Luthman  
>> wrote:
>> Uhm I think the Force 190 is showing up at distributors at this point?  It's 
>> cheaper and 3db less than the Force 200.  A good gap between 180 and 190, 
>> but I still suggest Force 200.
>> 
>> 
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> 
>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Colin Stanners  wrote:
>>> -- Forwarded message --
>>> From: "FCC ID Alert" 
>>> Date: Aug 30, 2017 7:30 AM
>>> Subject: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment
>>> To: "FCC ID Alert" 
>>> Cc: 
>>> 
>>> A new FCC ID application has been submitted by Cambium Networks Inc. for 
>>> New Equipment.
>>> See FCC ID Z8H89FT0031 
>>> Equipment Authorized: ePMP Force 190 Transceiver
>>> unsubscribe
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment

[Josh Luthman]

Are you dropping 180 for the 190?  In what situation would you use a 190
(previously 180) instead of a 200?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Mathew Howard  wrote:

> Yup... it's existence has been public for awhile... and this reminds me, I
> need to order some.
>
> The neat thing about the Force 190 is that it comes in the same size box
> as the Force 180. I still expect to use Force 200s most of the time, but
> there are a lot of cases where the 180 isn't quite enough where these
> should be a good fit.
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Josh Luthman <
> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>
>> Uhm I think the Force 190 is showing up at distributors at this point?
>> It's cheaper and 3db less than the Force 200.  A good gap between 180 and
>> 190, but I still suggest Force 200.
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Colin Stanners 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> -- Forwarded message --
>>> From: "FCC ID Alert" 
>>> Date: Aug 30, 2017 7:30 AM
>>> Subject: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment
>>> To: "FCC ID Alert" 
>>> Cc:
>>>
>>> A new FCC ID application has been submitted by Cambium Networks Inc. for
>>> New Equipment.
>>> See FCC ID Z8H89FT0031
>>> 
>>> Equipment Authorized: ePMP Force 190 Transceiver
>>>
>>> unsubscribe
>>> 
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment

[Mathew Howard]

No, we'll probably keep using the 180 for really short links, but we really
don't use that many as it is. I'm not really sure how often we'll end up
using the 190, but I'm thinking it will be something like if we get less
than -60 use a Force 200, otherwise, use a 190 or a 180.

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> Are you dropping 180 for the 190?  In what situation would you use a 190
> (previously 180) instead of a 200?
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Mathew Howard 
> wrote:
>
>> Yup... it's existence has been public for awhile... and this reminds me,
>> I need to order some.
>>
>> The neat thing about the Force 190 is that it comes in the same size box
>> as the Force 180. I still expect to use Force 200s most of the time, but
>> there are a lot of cases where the 180 isn't quite enough where these
>> should be a good fit.
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Josh Luthman <
>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Uhm I think the Force 190 is showing up at distributors at this point?
>>> It's cheaper and 3db less than the Force 200.  A good gap between 180 and
>>> 190, but I still suggest Force 200.
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Colin Stanners 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 -- Forwarded message --
 From: "FCC ID Alert" 
 Date: Aug 30, 2017 7:30 AM
 Subject: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment
 To: "FCC ID Alert" 
 Cc:

 A new FCC ID application has been submitted by Cambium Networks Inc.
 for New Equipment.
 See FCC ID Z8H89FT0031
 
 Equipment Authorized: ePMP Force 190 Transceiver

 unsubscribe
 

>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment

[can...@believewireless.net]

I really don't know where this fits in. Who wants to keep three radios on
the truck? If they could have
made the same design for say a 27db antenna, that would be something we'd
use.

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Mathew Howard  wrote:

> No, we'll probably keep using the 180 for really short links, but we
> really don't use that many as it is. I'm not really sure how often we'll
> end up using the 190, but I'm thinking it will be something like if we get
> less than -60 use a Force 200, otherwise, use a 190 or a 180.
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Josh Luthman <
> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>
>> Are you dropping 180 for the 190?  In what situation would you use a 190
>> (previously 180) instead of a 200?
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Mathew Howard 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yup... it's existence has been public for awhile... and this reminds me,
>>> I need to order some.
>>>
>>> The neat thing about the Force 190 is that it comes in the same size box
>>> as the Force 180. I still expect to use Force 200s most of the time, but
>>> there are a lot of cases where the 180 isn't quite enough where these
>>> should be a good fit.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Josh Luthman <
>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>>
 Uhm I think the Force 190 is showing up at distributors at this point?
 It's cheaper and 3db less than the Force 200.  A good gap between 180 and
 190, but I still suggest Force 200.


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
 Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Colin Stanners 
 wrote:

> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "FCC ID Alert" 
> Date: Aug 30, 2017 7:30 AM
> Subject: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment
> To: "FCC ID Alert" 
> Cc:
>
> A new FCC ID application has been submitted by Cambium Networks Inc.
> for New Equipment.
> See FCC ID Z8H89FT0031
> 
> Equipment Authorized: ePMP Force 190 Transceiver
>
> unsubscribe
> 
>


>>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment

[Gino A. Villarini]

WE will try to standardize on the Force 190, if we need more, then a 200 or 
Conn. With 2ft dish

From: Af mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of 
Mathew Howard mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" 
mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 1:53 PM
To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New 
Equipment

No, we'll probably keep using the 180 for really short links, but we really 
don't use that many as it is. I'm not really sure how often we'll end up using 
the 190, but I'm thinking it will be something like if we get less than -60 use 
a Force 200, otherwise, use a 190 or a 180.




Gino A. Villarini


President
Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968

[cid:aeronet-logo_310cfc3e-6691-4f69-bd49-b37b834b9238.png]

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Josh Luthman 
mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
Are you dropping 180 for the 190?  In what situation would you use a 190 
(previously 180) instead of a 200?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Mathew Howard 
mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yup... it's existence has been public for awhile... and this reminds me, I need 
to order some.

The neat thing about the Force 190 is that it comes in the same size box as the 
Force 180. I still expect to use Force 200s most of the time, but there are a 
lot of cases where the 180 isn't quite enough where these should be a good fit.

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Josh Luthman 
mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
Uhm I think the Force 190 is showing up at distributors at this point?  It's 
cheaper and 3db less than the Force 200.  A good gap between 180 and 190, but I 
still suggest Force 200.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Colin Stanners 
mailto:cstann...@gmail.com>> wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: "FCC ID Alert" mailto:ale...@fccid.io>>
Date: Aug 30, 2017 7:30 AM
Subject: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment
To: "FCC ID Alert" mailto:ale...@fccid.io>>
Cc:

A new FCC ID application has been submitted by Cambium Networks Inc. for New 
Equipment.
See FCC ID 
Z8H89FT0031<http://email.fccid.io/c/eJw1jbsOwyAMAL8mjMjYJpCBoUkV9QM6daMGGqQ8qiT_r2apdMMtp0uBXMzSqRoQjANPYJAAWLceHel-IB7724BoB0a8NwxFpCZdNzWFZICYiiudaVO00VmbzTt7Sb4VLqzmMJ3n92jo1uB48W8vffmH78YnABm1BznOuK55P67BZ4l11rItP6-WLBs>
Equipment Authorized: ePMP Force 190 Transceiver

unsubscribe<http://email.fccid.io/u/eJwNy8EOgyAMANCvkSMpLUJ34KAs-4_a4kYyNVH_P9u7PyuUpenD9YIQMjBBQAKIPjFm8nOl-JqnijjWiPgcIqyq3Xw_3KcI2oLZIFJg4TaqLdSY15USJBRzZ9Hrln1v5_Wf70361-uxubsMOP0A2ikikw>

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment

[Jeff Broadwick - Lists]

I'm sorry...they are supposed to ship soon.  Should be in the US around the 
beginning of October.

Jeff Broadwick
ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@converge-tech.com

> On Aug 30, 2017, at 1:08 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists  wrote:
> 
> Will ship from Asia around Oct. 1st.
> 
> Jeff Broadwick
> ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
> 312-205-2519 Office
> 574-220-7826 Cell
> jbroadw...@converge-tech.com
> 
>> On Aug 30, 2017, at 1:05 PM, Mathew Howard  wrote:
>> 
>> Yup... it's existence has been public for awhile... and this reminds me, I 
>> need to order some.
>> 
>> The neat thing about the Force 190 is that it comes in the same size box as 
>> the Force 180. I still expect to use Force 200s most of the time, but there 
>> are a lot of cases where the 180 isn't quite enough where these should be a 
>> good fit.
>> 
>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Josh Luthman 
>>>  wrote:
>>> Uhm I think the Force 190 is showing up at distributors at this point?  
>>> It's cheaper and 3db less than the Force 200.  A good gap between 180 and 
>>> 190, but I still suggest Force 200.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> 
 On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Colin Stanners  
 wrote:
 -- Forwarded message --
 From: "FCC ID Alert" 
 Date: Aug 30, 2017 7:30 AM
 Subject: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment
 To: "FCC ID Alert" 
 Cc: 
 
 A new FCC ID application has been submitted by Cambium Networks Inc. for 
 New Equipment.
 See FCC ID Z8H89FT0031 
 Equipment Authorized: ePMP Force 190 Transceiver
 unsubscribe
 
 
>>> 
>> 

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment

[Josh Luthman]

That's what I'm thinking?  99% of our installs are Force 200.  Too much
gain?  Oh well ATPC takes care of it.

Best case you're saving $30 which is assuming $0 cost of maintaining
another item, room in the van, never mistakenly used it when it should have
been a 200...


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 2:00 PM, can...@believewireless.net <
p...@believewireless.net> wrote:

> I really don't know where this fits in. Who wants to keep three radios on
> the truck? If they could have
> made the same design for say a 27db antenna, that would be something we'd
> use.
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Mathew Howard 
> wrote:
>
>> No, we'll probably keep using the 180 for really short links, but we
>> really don't use that many as it is. I'm not really sure how often we'll
>> end up using the 190, but I'm thinking it will be something like if we get
>> less than -60 use a Force 200, otherwise, use a 190 or a 180.
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Josh Luthman <
>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Are you dropping 180 for the 190?  In what situation would you use a 190
>>> (previously 180) instead of a 200?
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Mathew Howard 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Yup... it's existence has been public for awhile... and this reminds
 me, I need to order some.

 The neat thing about the Force 190 is that it comes in the same size
 box as the Force 180. I still expect to use Force 200s most of the time,
 but there are a lot of cases where the 180 isn't quite enough where these
 should be a good fit.

 On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Josh Luthman <
 j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:

> Uhm I think the Force 190 is showing up at distributors at this
> point?  It's cheaper and 3db less than the Force 200.  A good gap between
> 180 and 190, but I still suggest Force 200.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Colin Stanners 
> wrote:
>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: "FCC ID Alert" 
>> Date: Aug 30, 2017 7:30 AM
>> Subject: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment
>> To: "FCC ID Alert" 
>> Cc:
>>
>> A new FCC ID application has been submitted by Cambium Networks Inc.
>> for New Equipment.
>> See FCC ID Z8H89FT0031
>> 
>> Equipment Authorized: ePMP Force 190 Transceiver
>>
>> unsubscribe
>> 
>>
>
>

>>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment

[Steve Jones]

i was sent an image, this is a dish style, like a mini 2000?

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> That's what I'm thinking?  99% of our installs are Force 200.  Too much
> gain?  Oh well ATPC takes care of it.
>
> Best case you're saving $30 which is assuming $0 cost of maintaining
> another item, room in the van, never mistakenly used it when it should have
> been a 200...
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 2:00 PM, can...@believewireless.net <
> p...@believewireless.net> wrote:
>
>> I really don't know where this fits in. Who wants to keep three radios on
>> the truck? If they could have
>> made the same design for say a 27db antenna, that would be something we'd
>> use.
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Mathew Howard 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> No, we'll probably keep using the 180 for really short links, but we
>>> really don't use that many as it is. I'm not really sure how often we'll
>>> end up using the 190, but I'm thinking it will be something like if we get
>>> less than -60 use a Force 200, otherwise, use a 190 or a 180.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Josh Luthman <
>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>>
 Are you dropping 180 for the 190?  In what situation would you use a
 190 (previously 180) instead of a 200?


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
 Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Mathew Howard 
 wrote:

> Yup... it's existence has been public for awhile... and this reminds
> me, I need to order some.
>
> The neat thing about the Force 190 is that it comes in the same size
> box as the Force 180. I still expect to use Force 200s most of the time,
> but there are a lot of cases where the 180 isn't quite enough where these
> should be a good fit.
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Josh Luthman <
> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>
>> Uhm I think the Force 190 is showing up at distributors at this
>> point?  It's cheaper and 3db less than the Force 200.  A good gap between
>> 180 and 190, but I still suggest Force 200.
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Colin Stanners 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> -- Forwarded message --
>>> From: "FCC ID Alert" 
>>> Date: Aug 30, 2017 7:30 AM
>>> Subject: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment
>>> To: "FCC ID Alert" 
>>> Cc:
>>>
>>> A new FCC ID application has been submitted by Cambium Networks Inc.
>>> for New Equipment.
>>> See FCC ID Z8H89FT0031
>>> 
>>> Equipment Authorized: ePMP Force 190 Transceiver
>>>
>>> unsubscribe
>>> 
>>>
>>
>>
>

>>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment

[Mathew Howard]

Yeah, once it's assembled it's going to look more or less like a Force 200,
but it's a four piece dish that snaps together somehow, so it comes in a
much smaller box.

I'm not really convinced that there's that much use for a smaller dish, but
Ubiquiti has been selling a 22dbi and a 25dbi model forever, so I guess
there's a market for a slightly cheaper, slightly lower gain SM.

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Steve Jones 
wrote:

> i was sent an image, this is a dish style, like a mini 2000?
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Josh Luthman  > wrote:
>
>> That's what I'm thinking?  99% of our installs are Force 200.  Too much
>> gain?  Oh well ATPC takes care of it.
>>
>> Best case you're saving $30 which is assuming $0 cost of maintaining
>> another item, room in the van, never mistakenly used it when it should have
>> been a 200...
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 2:00 PM, can...@believewireless.net <
>> p...@believewireless.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I really don't know where this fits in. Who wants to keep three radios
>>> on the truck? If they could have
>>> made the same design for say a 27db antenna, that would be something
>>> we'd use.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Mathew Howard 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 No, we'll probably keep using the 180 for really short links, but we
 really don't use that many as it is. I'm not really sure how often we'll
 end up using the 190, but I'm thinking it will be something like if we get
 less than -60 use a Force 200, otherwise, use a 190 or a 180.

 On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Josh Luthman <
 j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:

> Are you dropping 180 for the 190?  In what situation would you use a
> 190 (previously 180) instead of a 200?
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Mathew Howard 
> wrote:
>
>> Yup... it's existence has been public for awhile... and this reminds
>> me, I need to order some.
>>
>> The neat thing about the Force 190 is that it comes in the same size
>> box as the Force 180. I still expect to use Force 200s most of the time,
>> but there are a lot of cases where the 180 isn't quite enough where these
>> should be a good fit.
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Josh Luthman <
>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Uhm I think the Force 190 is showing up at distributors at this
>>> point?  It's cheaper and 3db less than the Force 200.  A good gap 
>>> between
>>> 180 and 190, but I still suggest Force 200.
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Colin Stanners >> > wrote:
>>>
 -- Forwarded message --
 From: "FCC ID Alert" 
 Date: Aug 30, 2017 7:30 AM
 Subject: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment
 To: "FCC ID Alert" 
 Cc:

 A new FCC ID application has been submitted by Cambium Networks
 Inc. for New Equipment.
 See FCC ID Z8H89FT0031
 
 Equipment Authorized: ePMP Force 190 Transceiver

 unsubscribe
 

>>>
>>>
>>
>

>>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment

[George Skorup]

We'll probably never buy the 190. The 180 works fine up to maybe a mile, 
200 for anything beyond that.


On 8/31/2017 4:44 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
Yeah, once it's assembled it's going to look more or less like a Force 
200, but it's a four piece dish that snaps together somehow, so it 
comes in a much smaller box.


I'm not really convinced that there's that much use for a smaller 
dish, but Ubiquiti has been selling a 22dbi and a 25dbi model forever, 
so I guess there's a market for a slightly cheaper, slightly lower 
gain SM.


On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Steve Jones 
mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:


i was sent an image, this is a dish style, like a mini 2000?

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Josh Luthman
mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>>
wrote:

That's what I'm thinking?  99% of our installs are Force 200. 
Too much gain?  Oh well ATPC takes care of it.

Best case you're saving $30 which is assuming $0 cost of
maintaining another item, room in the van, never mistakenly
used it when it should have been a 200...


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 2:00 PM, can...@believewireless.net
 mailto:p...@believewireless.net>> wrote:

I really don't know where this fits in. Who wants to keep
three radios on the truck? If they could have
made the same design for say a 27db antenna, that would be
something we'd use.

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Mathew Howard
mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> wrote:

No, we'll probably keep using the 180 for really short
links, but we really don't use that many as it is. I'm
not really sure how often we'll end up using the 190,
but I'm thinking it will be something like if we get
less than -60 use a Force 200, otherwise, use a 190 or
a 180.

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Josh Luthman
mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:

Are you dropping 180 for the 190?  In what
situation would you use a 190 (previously 180)
instead of a 200?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Mathew Howard
mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Yup... it's existence has been public for
awhile... and this reminds me, I need to order
some.

The neat thing about the Force 190 is that it
comes in the same size box as the Force 180. I
still expect to use Force 200s most of the
time, but there are a lot of cases where the
180 isn't quite enough where these should be a
good fit.

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Josh Luthman
mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:

Uhm I think the Force 190 is showing up at
distributors at this point?  It's cheaper
and 3db less than the Force 200.  A good
gap between 180 and 190, but I still
suggest Force 200.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340

Direct: 937-552-2343

1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Colin
Stanners mailto:cstann...@gmail.com>> wrote:

-- Forwarded message --
From: "FCC ID Alert" mailto:ale...@fccid.io>>
Date: Aug 30, 2017 7:30 AM
Subject: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID
Application for New Equipment
To: "FCC ID Alert" mailto:ale...@fccid.io>>
Cc:

A new FCC ID application has been
submitted by Cambium Networks Inc. for
New Equipment.
See FCC ID Z8H89FT0031

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment

[Steve Jones]

Um yeah, that 1 mile. That was the limit i set, but i have no
authourity to stab installer monkeys (something to do with peta and tree
huggers) the 180 is perfect for not blinding the ap when atpc isnt enough
on the 200 without spirious noise all over the locale from a downtilt (or
left right tilt cause the fucking monkeys dont listen)
But i find these cocks at 3 miles, cause they can be clipped to a fucking
downspout on december 3.
Stab stab stab, fucking stab.
I like the parabolic design, assuming they are wind light.
F% wrote:

> We'll probably never buy the 190. The 180 works fine up to maybe a mile,
> 200 for anything beyond that.
>
> On 8/31/2017 4:44 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
>
> Yeah, once it's assembled it's going to look more or less like a Force
> 200, but it's a four piece dish that snaps together somehow, so it comes in
> a much smaller box.
>
> I'm not really convinced that there's that much use for a smaller dish,
> but Ubiquiti has been selling a 22dbi and a 25dbi model forever, so I guess
> there's a market for a slightly cheaper, slightly lower gain SM.
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Steve Jones 
> wrote:
>
>> i was sent an image, this is a dish style, like a mini 2000?
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Josh Luthman <
>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> That's what I'm thinking?  99% of our installs are Force 200.  Too much
>>> gain?  Oh well ATPC takes care of it.
>>>
>>> Best case you're saving $30 which is assuming $0 cost of maintaining
>>> another item, room in the van, never mistakenly used it when it should have
>>> been a 200...
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <%28937%29%20552-2340>
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <%28937%29%20552-2343>
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 2:00 PM, can...@believewireless.net <
>>> p...@believewireless.net> wrote:
>>>
 I really don't know where this fits in. Who wants to keep three radios
 on the truck? If they could have
 made the same design for say a 27db antenna, that would be something
 we'd use.

 On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Mathew Howard 
 wrote:

> No, we'll probably keep using the 180 for really short links, but we
> really don't use that many as it is. I'm not really sure how often we'll
> end up using the 190, but I'm thinking it will be something like if we get
> less than -60 use a Force 200, otherwise, use a 190 or a 180.
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Josh Luthman <
> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>
>> Are you dropping 180 for the 190?  In what situation would you use a
>> 190 (previously 180) instead of a 200?
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <%28937%29%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <%28937%29%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Mathew Howard 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yup... it's existence has been public for awhile... and this reminds
>>> me, I need to order some.
>>>
>>> The neat thing about the Force 190 is that it comes in the same size
>>> box as the Force 180. I still expect to use Force 200s most of the time,
>>> but there are a lot of cases where the 180 isn't quite enough where 
>>> these
>>> should be a good fit.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Josh Luthman <
>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>>
 Uhm I think the Force 190 is showing up at distributors at this
 point?  It's cheaper and 3db less than the Force 200.  A good gap 
 between
 180 and 190, but I still suggest Force 200.


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340 <%28937%29%20552-2340>
 Direct: 937-552-2343 <%28937%29%20552-2343>
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Colin Stanners <
 cstann...@gmail.com> wrote:

> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "FCC ID Alert" 
> Date: Aug 30, 2017 7:30 AM
> Subject: Cambium Networks Inc. FCC ID Application for New Equipment
> To: "FCC ID Alert" 
> Cc:
>
> A new FCC ID application has been submitted by Cambium Networks
> Inc. for New Equipment.
> See FCC ID Z8H89FT0031
> 
> Equipment Authorized: ePMP Force 190 Transceiver
>
> unsubscribe
> 
>


>>>
>>
>

>>>
>