Re: [AFMUG] OT Low Energy Nuclear
This invention has been the subject of huge skepticism by the scientific community. Rossi won’t let anyone see it close enough to determine if it’s a sham and at the same time, he has passed tests that he tightly controls. However, Lockheed is claiming that they will have a reactor similar to this called an E-Cat (although they claim it’s not the same thing) and a fusion reactor within a few years so who knows. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 7:34 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Low Energy Nuclear I swore I heard someone patented, Some shit happens, now wait for me to sue you. ;-) - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]https://twitter.com/ICSIL Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]https://twitter.com/mdwestix From: Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.commailto:af...@kwisp.com To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 11:14:42 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Low Energy Nuclear Looks chemical not nuclear. But that patent has only 1 independent claim which is basically “reagents react in the presence of a catalyst to heat water, with a temperature sensor and heater to start/restart the reaction when needed”. Hard to believe in 2015 that is patentable. From: Chuck McCownmailto:ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 10:59 AM To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] OT Low Energy Nuclear I guess the Patent office believes in it: https://animpossibleinvention.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/us9115913b1.pdf
Re: [AFMUG] OT Low Energy Nuclear
Looks chemical not nuclear. But that patent has only 1 independent claim which is basically “reagents react in the presence of a catalyst to heat water, with a temperature sensor and heater to start/restart the reaction when needed”. Hard to believe in 2015 that is patentable. From: Chuck McCown Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 10:59 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] OT Low Energy Nuclear I guess the Patent office believes in it: https://animpossibleinvention.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/us9115913b1.pdf
Re: [AFMUG] OT Low Energy Nuclear
I swore I heard someone patented, Some shit happens, now wait for me to sue you. ;-) - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 11:14:42 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Low Energy Nuclear Looks chemical not nuclear. But that patent has only 1 independent claim which is basically “reagents react in the presence of a catalyst to heat water, with a temperature sensor and heater to start/restart the reaction when needed”. Hard to believe in 2015 that is patentable. From: Chuck McCown Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 10:59 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] OT Low Energy Nuclear I guess the Patent office believes in it: https://animpossibleinvention.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/us9115913b1.pdf
Re: [AFMUG] OT Low Energy Nuclear
Patents always remind me of this cartoon. From: Mike Hammett Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 9:33 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Low Energy Nuclear I swore I heard someone patented, Some shit happens, now wait for me to sue you. ;-) - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com From: Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 11:14:42 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Low Energy Nuclear Looks chemical not nuclear. But that patent has only 1 independent claim which is basically “reagents react in the presence of a catalyst to heat water, with a temperature sensor and heater to start/restart the reaction when needed”. Hard to believe in 2015 that is patentable. From: Chuck McCown Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 10:59 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] OT Low Energy Nuclear I guess the Patent office believes in it: https://animpossibleinvention.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/us9115913b1.pdf
