Re: [AFMUG] 15.0.2 on 450i / 900mhz

[Brandon Yuchasz]

Matt,
I can create self interference on my 450i 900mhz by not using colocation 
settings on my FSK that is 16 miles away so I would suspect that the frame size 
was important. I can cause issues just by not matching up closely enough on 
download % and so on as outlined in the white paper. That not to say that 
15.0.2 didn’t help it certainly could have as well. We upgraded a few nights 
ago and I did see re-reg issues go away but other than noticing that and making 
sure its been stable I have not looked deeper into if it improved anything 
else. Utilazation was on issue on one AP I should look and see if its improved 
at all.  Love to hear others feedback on this.

 Ill be sharing some FSK / 450i issues I have discovered after I get one more 
late night to verify what I am seeing.

Brandon




-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 10:42 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 15.0.2 on 450i / 900mhz

We also noticed an improvement when we moved from 2.5ms to 5.0ms frame size and 
upgraded too 15.0.2 at same time.  Was not sure which did it.
Is Canopy 900 FSK 5ms frames?  But our nearest FSK gear was like 10 miles away.



On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Eric Muehleisen <ericm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's what I thought. But we verified it with linktests and 
> speedtests. Not to mention session uptimes went from re-reging 
> multiple times a day to rock-solid.
>
> No configuration or frequency changes. Just firmware upgrade. I'm 
> hoping that v15 firmware will bring some improvements to our 5ghz 450 AP's.
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>>
>> That looks too good to be true.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Muehleisen
>> Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 9:17 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: [AFMUG] 15.0.2 on 450i / 900mhz
>>
>>
>>
>> FYI...the 15.0.2 upgrade made substantial improvements for our testing.
>> It's only 6 subs but the utilizations and link stability have 
>> improved dramatically. You can probably see on the attachment when 
>> the upgrade took place.
>>
>>
>>
>> Anyone out there seeing any improvements with the 15.0.2 code for the 
>> 5ghz 450's?
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] 15.0.2 on 450i / 900mhz

[Ken Hohhof]

Yes, 5 ms.  We also have nearest competitor FSK 900 is 10 miles away, and 
absolutely we had to tweak all the parameters to sync with it, otherwise we had 
poor modulation and reregs.


-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 10:42 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 15.0.2 on 450i / 900mhz

We also noticed an improvement when we moved from 2.5ms to 5.0ms frame size and 
upgraded too 15.0.2 at same time.  Was not sure which did it.
Is Canopy 900 FSK 5ms frames?  But our nearest FSK gear was like 10 miles away.



On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Eric Muehleisen <ericm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's what I thought. But we verified it with linktests and 
> speedtests. Not to mention session uptimes went from re-reging 
> multiple times a day to rock-solid.
>
> No configuration or frequency changes. Just firmware upgrade. I'm 
> hoping that v15 firmware will bring some improvements to our 5ghz 450 AP's.
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>>
>> That looks too good to be true.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Muehleisen
>> Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 9:17 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: [AFMUG] 15.0.2 on 450i / 900mhz
>>
>>
>>
>> FYI...the 15.0.2 upgrade made substantial improvements for our testing.
>> It's only 6 subs but the utilizations and link stability have 
>> improved dramatically. You can probably see on the attachment when 
>> the upgrade took place.
>>
>>
>>
>> Anyone out there seeing any improvements with the 15.0.2 code for the 
>> 5ghz 450's?
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] 15.0.2 on 450i / 900mhz

[Matt]

We also noticed an improvement when we moved from 2.5ms to 5.0ms frame
size and upgraded too 15.0.2 at same time.  Was not sure which did it.
Is Canopy 900 FSK 5ms frames?  But our nearest FSK gear was like 10
miles away.



On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Eric Muehleisen  wrote:
> That's what I thought. But we verified it with linktests and speedtests. Not
> to mention session uptimes went from re-reging multiple times a day to
> rock-solid.
>
> No configuration or frequency changes. Just firmware upgrade. I'm hoping
> that v15 firmware will bring some improvements to our 5ghz 450 AP's.
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Ken Hohhof  wrote:
>>
>> That looks too good to be true.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Muehleisen
>> Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 9:17 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: [AFMUG] 15.0.2 on 450i / 900mhz
>>
>>
>>
>> FYI...the 15.0.2 upgrade made substantial improvements for our testing.
>> It's only 6 subs but the utilizations and link stability have improved
>> dramatically. You can probably see on the attachment when the upgrade took
>> place.
>>
>>
>>
>> Anyone out there seeing any improvements with the 15.0.2 code for the 5ghz
>> 450's?
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] 15.0.2 on 450i / 900mhz

[Eric Muehleisen]

That's what I thought. But we verified it with linktests and speedtests.
Not to mention session uptimes went from re-reging multiple times a day to
rock-solid.

No configuration or frequency changes. Just firmware upgrade. I'm hoping
that v15 firmware will bring some improvements to our 5ghz 450 AP's.

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Ken Hohhof  wrote:

> That looks too good to be true.
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Eric Muehleisen
> *Sent:* Monday, January 9, 2017 9:17 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] 15.0.2 on 450i / 900mhz
>
>
>
> FYI...the 15.0.2 upgrade made substantial improvements for our testing.
> It's only 6 subs but the utilizations and link stability have improved
> dramatically. You can probably see on the attachment when the upgrade took
> place.
>
>
>
> Anyone out there seeing any improvements with the 15.0.2 code for the 5ghz
> 450's?
>

Re: [AFMUG] 15.0.2 on 450i / 900mhz

[Ken Hohhof]

That looks too good to be true.

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Muehleisen
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 9:17 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] 15.0.2 on 450i / 900mhz

 

FYI...the 15.0.2 upgrade made substantial improvements for our testing. It's 
only 6 subs but the utilizations and link stability have improved dramatically. 
You can probably see on the attachment when the upgrade took place.

 

Anyone out there seeing any improvements with the 15.0.2 code for the 5ghz 
450's?