Re: [AFMUG] FCC Set Top NPRM
I just heard Wheeler advocating for transparency from ISPs WRT personal information "that they all collect". Wha? But as to your other comment. Don't forget the chainsaw. bpOn 3/11/2016 10:02 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: Government trying to regulate technology does seem to guarantee they are always fighting the last war. Or the one before that. Let's regulate set top boxes, just as they are going away! Let's require broadband providers to offer POTS and battery backup! And web browsing history, that's like phone company CDRs, right, so let's require a PIN number before you can tell the customer his Internet is slow because he's downloading a 30 GB Xbox game or streaming 3 Netflix movies at once. Why not require all cars to carry a shovel and bucket in the trunk for cleaning up the horse poop! And all stores should be required to have a hitching post and water trough in front.
Re: [AFMUG] FCC Set Top NPRM
Odd, it appears they may be letting the ILECs off the the hook for providing dial tone. And it also appears that the ILECs will be able to charge for providing back up power. -Original Message- From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 11:02 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Set Top NPRM Government trying to regulate technology does seem to guarantee they are always fighting the last war. Or the one before that. Let's regulate set top boxes, just as they are going away! Let's require broadband providers to offer POTS and battery backup! And web browsing history, that's like phone company CDRs, right, so let's require a PIN number before you can tell the customer his Internet is slow because he's downloading a 30 GB Xbox game or streaming 3 Netflix movies at once. Why not require all cars to carry a shovel and bucket in the trunk for cleaning up the horse poop! And all stores should be required to have a hitching post and water trough in front. -Original Message- From: Josh Reynolds Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 11:23 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] FCC Set Top NPRM http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2016/db0218/FCC-16-18A1.pdf This makes me giggle. As someone dealing with multiple content providers, middleware,, set top vendors, channel lineups, encryption systems, and the new purchase of a small satellite downlink farm, it's going to be incredibly interesting to see how the content and distribution industry handles this whole thing. Oh, the advertising folks as well. *throws hands up in air* There are a lot of technical concerns as well... for example, what happens if we move to an app based solution for every device, and forego multicast? That's going to place a *substantial* burden on ISP access and transit networks.
Re: [AFMUG] FCC Set Top NPRM
Government trying to regulate technology does seem to guarantee they are always fighting the last war. Or the one before that. Let's regulate set top boxes, just as they are going away! Let's require broadband providers to offer POTS and battery backup! And web browsing history, that's like phone company CDRs, right, so let's require a PIN number before you can tell the customer his Internet is slow because he's downloading a 30 GB Xbox game or streaming 3 Netflix movies at once. Why not require all cars to carry a shovel and bucket in the trunk for cleaning up the horse poop! And all stores should be required to have a hitching post and water trough in front. -Original Message- From: Josh Reynolds Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 11:23 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] FCC Set Top NPRM http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2016/db0218/FCC-16-18A1.pdf This makes me giggle. As someone dealing with multiple content providers, middleware,, set top vendors, channel lineups, encryption systems, and the new purchase of a small satellite downlink farm, it's going to be incredibly interesting to see how the content and distribution industry handles this whole thing. Oh, the advertising folks as well. *throws hands up in air* There are a lot of technical concerns as well... for example, what happens if we move to an app based solution for every device, and forego multicast? That's going to place a *substantial* burden on ISP access and transit networks.
Re: [AFMUG] FCC Set Top NPRM
MVCO. On Mar 11, 2016 11:52 AM,wrote: > I have been following this. Really muddies the water, especially with OTT > getting increasingly more fully featured with common channels. The day is > coming that CATV systems will just be nothing more than another ISP with > everyone getting their content from a large aggregator and CDN. I would be > more worried if I was Directtv or Dish. > > -Original Message- From: Josh Reynolds > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 10:23 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: [AFMUG] FCC Set Top NPRM > > > http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2016/db0218/FCC-16-18A1.pdf > > This makes me giggle. > > As someone dealing with multiple content providers, middleware,, set > top vendors, channel lineups, encryption systems, and the new purchase > of a small satellite downlink farm, it's going to be incredibly > interesting to see how the content and distribution industry handles > this whole thing. Oh, the advertising folks as well. > > *throws hands up in air* > > There are a lot of technical concerns as well... for example, what > happens if we move to an app based solution for every device, and > forego multicast? That's going to place a *substantial* burden on ISP > access and transit networks. >
Re: [AFMUG] FCC Set Top NPRM
I have been following this. Really muddies the water, especially with OTT getting increasingly more fully featured with common channels. The day is coming that CATV systems will just be nothing more than another ISP with everyone getting their content from a large aggregator and CDN. I would be more worried if I was Directtv or Dish. -Original Message- From: Josh Reynolds Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 10:23 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] FCC Set Top NPRM http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2016/db0218/FCC-16-18A1.pdf This makes me giggle. As someone dealing with multiple content providers, middleware,, set top vendors, channel lineups, encryption systems, and the new purchase of a small satellite downlink farm, it's going to be incredibly interesting to see how the content and distribution industry handles this whole thing. Oh, the advertising folks as well. *throws hands up in air* There are a lot of technical concerns as well... for example, what happens if we move to an app based solution for every device, and forego multicast? That's going to place a *substantial* burden on ISP access and transit networks.