On 10/19/07, Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.vetta.org/documents/ui_benelearn.pdf > > Unfortunately the test is not computable.
True but how about testing intelligence by comparing the performance of an agent across several computable environments (randomly-generated finite games) to the performance of a random agent? I suspect this measure would provide a reasonable estimate of Hutter's definition and could be made arbitrarily more accurate by increasing the number and complexity of test environments. David ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=55740663-05e954