Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3520, 3521 assigned to Gaelan

[Aris Merchant]

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Kerim Aydin  wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
>> > > I CFJ on the following:
>> > >Quazie is the author of the proposal "Throw off Your Chains".
>
> Gratuitous addition:
>
> If H. Judge Gaelan could also opine on if one party (Quazie or I)
> is a "coauthor" (as that term is wholly undefined in the Rules from
> what I can see), that would be much appreciated.

Gratuitous arguments (there may be more later):

Coauthor is not undefined. Rule 2350:

"A proposal is a type of entity consisting of a body of text and other
attributes. A player CAN create a proposal by announcement, specifying
its text and optionally specifying any of the following attributes:

An associated title.
A list of co-authors (which must be persons other than the author).
An adoption index."

-Aris

BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3520, 3521 assigned to Gaelan

[Kerim Aydin]

On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> > > I CFJ on the following:
> > >Quazie is the author of the proposal "Throw off Your Chains".

Gratuitous addition:

If H. Judge Gaelan could also opine on if one party (Quazie or I)
is a "coauthor" (as that term is wholly undefined in the Rules from
what I can see), that would be much appreciated.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal and CFJs

[Alex Smith]

On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 15:49 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Aris Merchant
> >  wrote:
> > I intend, without objection, to ratify the following document: {{There
> > is no proposal with the title "Throw off Your
> > Chains", and any entity which would otherwise be such a proposal is
> > not a proposal.}}
> 
> I object to this intent. Whoever thought of doing such a thing without
> reading the relevant rules is surely a fool.

I had to look up whether this works. It does (R2142 paragraph 2).

However, just to avoid any ambiguity, I also object.

-- 
ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal and CFJs

[Aris Merchant]

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Aris Merchant
 wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to ratify the following document: {{There
> is no proposal with the title "Throw off Your
> Chains", and any entity which would otherwise be such a proposal is
> not a proposal.}}

I object to this intent. Whoever thought of doing such a thing without
reading the relevant rules is surely a fool.

-Aris

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal and CFJs

[Aris Merchant]

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Kerim Aydin  wrote:
>
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2017, Quazie wrote:
>> 2942 was just amended when i Deputized Assessor, it's contents no longer
>> delay anything, and it's got a different name.
>
> Oh well shoot, I searched recent past on the term 2942 which isn't used
> in the proposal.  Serves me right for trying to be clear by putting rule
> title as well as number. :P
>
> Well, it's still a dictatorship, looks like, so needs repealing.
>
> Of course, the ability to *withdraw* a proposal is not included in the
> Agency...
>
>

I intend, without objection, to ratify the following document: {{There
is no proposal with the title "Throw off Your
Chains", and any entity which would otherwise be such a proposal is
not a proposal.}}

-Aris

BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposal(s) 7853-7857

[Alex Smith]

On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 17:29 +, Quazie wrote:
> I deputize for the Assessor to resolve voting on proposals 7853-7857 as
> follows:
> 
> >     | 7853 | 7854 | 7855 | 7856 | 7857 |
> > +--+--+--+--+--+
> > ais523  | F| F| F| F| F|
> > grok| P| P| P| F| F|
> > nichdel | P| F| P| F| F|
> > o   | F| F| P| F| P|
> > PSS | F| F| F| F| F|
> > Quazie  | Fx2  | Fx2  | Fx2  | Fx2  | Fx2  |
> > Aris| F| F| F| F| F|
> > +--+--+--+--+--+
> > F/A | 6/0  | 7/0  | 5/0  | 8/0  | 7/0  |
> > AI  | 3.0  | 3.0  | 1.0  | 2.0  | 1.0  |
> > V   | 8| 8| 8| 8| 8|
> > Q   | 4| 4| 4| 4| 4|
> > P   | T| T| T| T| T|

I award a Red Ribbon to myself (7853 amended the power-3 rule 955).

I award an Orange Ribbon to Quazie (7855 was unanimous).

I award an Orange Ribbon to grok (7857 was unanimous).

-- 
ais523

BUS: Proposal and CFJs

[Kerim Aydin]

Note to Arbitor:  this message contains 2 CFJs, below.

I use the BÖÖ Agency to submit the following proposal, "Throw off Your
Chains", AI-3, specifying that it is a Competition Proposal for the
current proposal competition:
--
WHEREAS:
   The perpetuation of dictatorship is not treating Agora Right Good
   Forever;

and WHEREAS:
   The existence of dictatorship is an anathema, and the presence of
   a current dictatorship in the Rules is a Mess of our own making;

and WHEREAS:
   The persons in power have not made a visible effort to clean up 
   said mess, in perhaps hoping that the hoi agorai will remain 
   docile, or apathetic;

and WHEREAS:
   such docility, in the long-term, is fully AGAINST OUR NATURE;

BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED:
   That Rule 2942 (Reward and Delay) is hereby REPEALED.
--


I CFJ on the following:
   Quazie is the author of the proposal "Throw off Your Chains".

Evidence: (above proposal & submission statement).

Arguments:

I state for the record that Quazie had no knowledge of this proposal
before it was sent to the public forum.  The proposal was written by
G., and submitted on behalf of Quazie via the BÖÖ Agency.

Rule 2350 reads in part:
  A player CAN create a proposal by announcement...
this is clearly Quazie.

But it also reads:
  The author (syn. proposer) of a proposal is the person who 
  submitted it.
"Submit" is not directly defined, and could be the publisher of the
message.  In this case, the sender and writer of the proposal is G.
Which one is the "person who submitted it"?

==


I CFJ on the following (linked to the above, please):
   The proposal "Throw off Your Chains" is a competition proposal
   for the current proposal competition.

Evidence:  (above proposal & submission statement).

Arguments:
Rule 2431 reads in part:
 any player CAN specify that a Proposal e submits is
  a Competition Proposal for that Competition. 

Whether this is in the proposal competition depends on whether
Quazie "submitted" the proposal, and whether G. had the ability
through the BÖÖ Agency to specify the competition.



 







  

Re: BUS: [Proposal Competition] A series of Competition Proposals

[Quazie]

I withdraw all proposals i've submitted to the Proposal Competition as the
thing just doesn't work and is currently a useless concept.

I Encourage everyone to ignore the Proposal Competition.

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:34 PM Quazie  wrote:

> I retract "Prime Minister Says What?" From the pool and the competition.
>
> I submit the following replacement proposal for the Proposal Competition
>
> Trivial Proposal "Prime Minister Says What? (v2)" AI = 2,
> co-author="Typos, PSS" mess="Typos"
> {{{
>   In rule 2423 replace:
>   {{{
>   The holder of the office of Prime Minister's voting  strength is
>   increased by 1 on all Agoran decisions other than a elections of
>   the Prime Minister.
>   }}}
>   with:
>   {{{
>   The holder of the office of Prime Minister's voting strength is
>   increased by 1 on all Agoran decisions, excluding elections for
>   the Prime Minister.
>   }}}
> }}}
>

Re: BUS: [Proposal Competition] A series of Competition Proposals

[Quazie]

I retract "Prime Minister Says What?" From the pool and the competition.

I submit the following replacement proposal for the Proposal Competition

Trivial Proposal "Prime Minister Says What? (v2)" AI = 2, co-author="Typos,
PSS" mess="Typos"
{{{
  In rule 2423 replace:
  {{{
  The holder of the office of Prime Minister's voting  strength is
  increased by 1 on all Agoran decisions other than a elections of
  the Prime Minister.
  }}}
  with:
  {{{
  The holder of the office of Prime Minister's voting strength is
  increased by 1 on all Agoran decisions, excluding elections for
  the Prime Minister.
  }}}
}}}

BUS: [Proposal Competition] So it Begins

[Quazie]

I, having obtained Agoran Consent, initiate a proposal competition with the
objective of: Treating Agora Right Good Forever by cleaning up the messes
we have collectively created.

I Humbly Request that: Each proposal submitted to the Proposal Competition
be labeled, clearly, in the subject line to be a part of the Proposal
Competition to make Aris' job easier.

I withdraw all proposals I currently have in the proposal pool, as I plan
to submit some of them to the Proposal Competition.

BUS: [Agoran SubNomic Corporation] A Completely Formal Nomic

[Publius Scribonius Scholasticus]

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com

BUS: Re: time to step in

[Kerim Aydin]

Having given notice, I use the powers of the GOD agency to create
the following Agency on behalf of the Agency's head:

On Mon, 29 May 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I use the powers of the GOD Agency, on behalf of the Agency's
> Head, to announce 24 hours Notice of intent to create the 
> following Agency:
> 
> Ben Öyle Öneriyorum  (BÖÖ)
> Head: Quazie
> Agents:  G.
> Powers:  1. The ability to submit proposals.
>   2. The ability to pend proposals using mechanisms
>  described by the Rules.

Question:

Do we have a reasonably-established shorthand for Agency actions?
Technically, I'm acting on behalf of Quazie here.  Do I have to say
that each time?

Have we come up with a simple shorthand "I use the powers of GOD
to do blah blah..."  that cuts down on all act-on-behalf language?
(I haven't been paying attention to how others have been invoking
agency powers).

[Over the weekend I came across an old CFJ on the semantics of the
act-on-behalf language, but I'm not finding it now.  That keeps
happening].

BUS: Keep judgements in BUS pls

[Kerim Aydin]

(Speaking as amateur Agoran historian here).

Standard practice has been to submit judgements in Business, not 
post them to Official (just like submitting proposals, Agencies,
etc). 

The main reason being, if someone wants to reconstruct history,
it's good to be able to go to (or filter) on Official, so that any
message in Official labelled "CFJ X judged Y" contains a full case
log.  Speeds up historical digging, and also, if we have a repeat
of last month's judicial traffic, that's doubling the volume in
Official, making it more to dig through to get non-judicial reports
as well.

thx!

BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Superintendent] Weekly Report

[Gaelan Steele]

CoE GII is missing 

Gaelab

> On Jun 5, 2017, at 11:03 AM, Quazie  wrote:
> 
> Agreed - Feel free to CoE, or I will CoE later today and fix it.
> 
>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:59 AM Gaelan Steele  wrote:
>> I think GII is missing. 
>> 
>>> On Jun 5, 2017, at 10:38 AM, Quazie  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Superintendent's Weekly Report
>>> 
>>> Short List of agencies:
>>> 
>>>   ASC - Head: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>>>   C♥️N - Head: CuddleBeam
>>>   C♥️U - Head: CuddleBeam
>>>   GOD - Head: Quazie
>>>   MKD - Head: Gaelan
>>>   PRN - Head: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>>> ! QPS - Head: Quazie
>>>   SSP - Head: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>>>   WTQ - Head: Quazie
>>>   gFP - Head: grok
>>>   ⌑შए - Head: 天火狐
>>> 
>>> New or changed agencies since last weekly:
>>> 
>>> Agoran SubNomic Corporation  (ASC)
>>> Head: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>>> Agents:  All persons
>>> Powers:  Participation is a type of negative boolean person switch,
>>>   like that defined in Rule 2162/8. There exists an instance of the
>>>   Participation switch for each combination of a person and a subnomic
>>>   (defined below). The internal state of the Agoran SubNomic
>>>   Corporation consists of any documents or switches defined in this
>>>   field or in documents defined therein. No amendment to this document
>>>   shall change the internal state of the Agoran SubNomic Corporation
>>>   beyond the explicit textual changes, unless explicitly stated
>>>   otherwise.
>>> 
>>> Any person with a Participation switch of true between emselves and a
>>>   specific subnomic, may, if allowed by the ruleset (see below) of
>>>   that subnomic, publish a report covering some subset of the internal
>>>   state of the subnomic with which eir participation switch is true,
>>>   on behalf of Publius Scribonius Scholasticus.
>>> 
>>> A subnomic is an entity having a unique name, a ruleset, an internal
>>>   state, and a playership. The internal state of a subnomic consists
>>>   of any documents or switches defined in the ruleset of that subnomic
>>>   or in documents defined therein. The playership of a subnomic is a
>>>   set of all people for whom the participation switch between em and
>>>   the specific subnomic is true. All members of the playership shall
>>>   be bound by the ruleset. The ruleset of a subnomic is a document
>>>   which governs play of the subnomic.
>>> 
>>> A subnomic may be created by any person by announcement by publishing
>>>   a ruleset to begin the playing of the subnomic with, declaring a
>>>   unique name for the subnomic, and flipping the participation switch
>>>   between em and the new subnomic to true. Persons may never flip a
>>>   participation switch that is not eir own.
>>> 
>>> A subnomic may be destroyed by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus without
>>>   objection.
>>> 
>>> If allowed by the ruleset of a specific subnomic, any person may flip
>>>   the participation switch between em and the specific subnomic.
>>>   Persons SHALL NOT flip eir participation switches to true unless
>>>   allowed by the rulesets of the specific subnomics. At any time, a
>>>   person may flip eir participation switch with a certain subnomic to
>>>   false.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Cuddlebeam ♥️ Novelty  (C♥️N)
>>> Head: CuddleBeam
>>> Agents:  All persons
>>> Powers:   Note: This Agency contains a Collection of pseudo-
>>>   Agencies ("SubAgencies") which have been designed for novelty and
>>>   nomic experimentation/research purposes. For Cuddlebeam's Agency-
>>>   powered utility and productivity functions, please refer to the
>>>   "Cuddlebeam ♥️ Utility" (C♥️U) Agency.
>>> 
>>> ⭐Table of Contents & Short Summary:
>>>   1) Functionality Rules: How this works.
>>>   2) Cuddlebeam's Computer Emulation: Emulates a computer interface in
>>>   Agora's formal space.
>>>   3) Big Grafitti Wall: Area that any Player can edit with frivolous
>>>   content. Self-referential Power.
>>>   4) Alien Contact Program: Works like a SETI dish. Except its a
>>>   formal item instead of a dish.
>>>   5) Everyone is Playing Nomic: Similar to BGW, except enhanced to be
>>>   a nomic.
>>> 
>>> ⭐Functionality Rules: How this works.
>>> 
>>> For the purpose of this document, there exists "SubAgencies", as
>>>   described within this Powers section, which is made up of a SubName,
>>>   SubAgents and SubPowers section which can be filled with text
>>>   content. Only Agents which are part of the subset which SubAgency's
>>>   SubAgents section refers to can employ the abilities described in
>>>   the Powers section of that SubAgency.
>>> 
>>> SubAgencies, for the purpose of this document, are known to be "sub-
>>>   documents".
>>> 
>>> The string "-♦️-" in this document are readability
>>>   separators and are known as a ReadFriend.
>>> 
>>> The following between ReadFriends is a SubAgency:
>>> 
>>> Note: I want to get Doom, the videogame, running on this later. I
>>>   still 

BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3518 assigned to ais523

[Alex Smith]

On Mon, 2017-05-29 at 17:32 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-05-28 at 23:22 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > 
> > (sorry this is stuck in my mind).
> > (also, it's more research interest than anything "real").
> > (And I'm just making work for myself, really).
> > 
> > I CFJ on:  
> >   When a player performs a dependent action, e is the recordkeepor of
> >   supporters and/or objectors to the action, for the purposes of R2125. 
> > 
> > I bar CuddleBeam.
> 
> This is CFJ 3518. I assign it to myself.

If I remember correctly, "recordkeepor" was at one point defined in the
rules. Currently, there are only two uses: in rule 2125, and rule 2438
(which defines the Tailor as the recordkeepor of Ribbons). Rule 2438
immediately goes on to define the Tailor as tracking the Ribbon switch
in eir monthly report, which fits the previous and common usage of
"recordkeepor" (as the player who is responsible for reporting on a
specific subset of the gamestate).

Does rule 1728 create a recordkeepor-like obligation? I don't think so.
As worded, the rule doesn't imply "MUST track, and SHOULD publish"; it
just says "SHOULD publish". One plausible reason for not publishing a
list of supporters and/or objectors is that you weren't tracking them.
(For example, suppose in a quiet period, which has no Agencies or
similar constructs, you intend to perform an action without 3
objections, and only 2 messages are sent to the public fora between the
intent and resolution. It's obvious that the action can be resolved
even if you don't scour the messages in question for objections.)

Another argument for FALSE is that the requirement (if it exists) to
track the lists of supporters and objectors is instantaneous; there's 
no requirement to do so after resolving the action (obviously), but
also no requirement to do so beforehand (because you can simply choose
to not resolve your intent). As such, there are no records to update;
you're compiling a list at a specific instant, rather than keeping one
maintained over time. I think this is a weaker argument than the above,
but still easily strong enough to decide the CFJ by itself (implying
that even if rule 1728 had a SHALL not a SHOULD, a dependent actor
still wouldn't be a recordkeepor of support and objection).

I should also note that the above argument implies that the question is
only of academic interest; even if a dependent actor /were/ a
recordkeepor, they would be so only instantaneously, and thus rule 2125
would only make supporting/objecting regulated instantaneously. Given
that support and objection happen /before/ the dependent action, rather
than at the same time as it, rule 2125 can't have any impact on whether
they're possible/legal or not.

Out of interest, does anyone know if the Assessor was ever defined as a
recordkeepor of votes? I don't think this has been the case in any
remotely recent ruleset, even when the recordkeepor concept was widely
used for other offices, but may have been the case in the distant past
back when votes were submitted to the Assessor rather than made
publicly.

I judge CFJ 3518 FALSE.

-- 
ais523

BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

[Quazie]

COE OMD is still a player


On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 02:59 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> I hereby issue the following as the Weekly Report of the Registrar for the
> week ending on June 5, 2017.
>
> 
>Registrar's Weekly Report
> 
>
> (all times UTC)
>
> Date of last report: 28 May 2017
> Date of this report:
>
> Recent events:
> Mass deregistration event - May 31, 2017
>
>
> Players (14) (Rule 869, self-ratifying)
>
> Player   Contact Registered
> --   --- --
> ais523   callforjudgement at yahoo.co.uk [1] 20 Mar 11
> Aris thoughtsoflifeandlight17 at gmail.com   13 Sep 16
> Murphy   emurphy42 at zoho.com   27 Oct 07
> oowen at grimoire.ca 12 Jul 16
> Sprocklemsprocklem at gmail.com  19 Oct 13
> 天火狐draconicdarkness at gmail.com   06 Nov 16
> Zachary Watterson [2]tannerswett at gmail.com26 Mar 17
> Quazie   quazienomic at gmail.com15 Apr 17
> P. Scholasticus [3]  pscriboniusscholasticus at gmail.com[4] 16 Apr 17
> tmanthe2nd   trstnbrdwg0 at gmail.com13 May 17
> Gaelan   gbs at canishe.com  15 May 17
> Cuddlebeam   cuddlebeam at googlemail.com20 May 17
> Ienpw IIIjames.m.beirne at gmail.com 21 May 17
> Veggiekeks   martinjroensch at gmail.com 25 May 17
>
>
> [1] also ais523 at alumni.bham.ac.uk
> [2] also known as Gumball
> [3] In full, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> [4] officially, but technically equivalent p.scribonius.scholasticus at
> googlemail.com
>
> Fora (Rule 478, self-ratifying)
>
> Type Location  Typical use
>   ---
> Public   agora-official at agoranomic.org  official reports
> Public   agora-business at agoranomic.org  other business
> Discussion   agora-discussion at agoranomic.orgdiscussion
> Discussion   irc://irc.freenode.net:6667/##nomic
>    discussion
> Public   agora at listserver.tue.nlbackup
>
> Subscribe or unsubscribe from main lists:
> http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
>
> Subscribe or unsubscribe from tue.nl backup list:
> http://listserver.tue.nl/mailman/listinfo/agora
>
> The IRC channel does not require subscription; set your IRC client to
> server irc.freenode.net, port 6667, channel ##nomic, and whatever
> nickname you like.
>
> Other rules pertaining to this office
> -
> Rule 2139 (The Registrar)
> Rule 1789 (Cantus Cygneus)
>
> Watchers (4)
>
> The list of Watchers is not governed by the rules, but is
> traditionally maintained in the Registrar's Report.  If you'd like to
> be listed as a Watcher or removed from the list, feel free to email
> the fora or the Registrar directly.
>
> Watchers confirmed as of May 2017:
>
> Nickname  Contact
>   ---
> Ørjan oerjan at nvg.ntnu.no
>
> Watchers confirmed as of May 2013:
>
> Nickname  Contact
>   ---
> Dave  davidnicol at gmail.com
> Phlogistique  noe.rubinstein at gmail.com
> Steve zardoz37 at gmail.com
>
>
> 
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>

BUS: Re: DIS: Draft Report: Proposal Pool

[Publius Scribonius Scholasticus]

I withdraw any proposals I have submitted from the pool.

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com



> On Jun 5, 2017, at 4:10 AM, Gaelan Steele  wrote:
> 
> IIRC, we still need ais to pend reports. I'll probably pend or destroy some 
> of mine after the cleanup is passed. 
> 
>> On Jun 5, 2017, at 12:17 AM, Aris Merchant 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> This is my draft report. I'm starting to get a little fed up with all
>> of the proposal hanging around in the pool. I was waiting for people
>> to get payed before I started complaining too much, but the June
>> payday has come and gone. The ratio of pool proposals to pending
>> proposals is absurd, even if I've missed a few pends or withdrawals.
>> There is no need to put a proposal into the pool until it is ready to
>> be pended. It serves no purpose, and just creates more record keeping
>> for the Promotor. If you want to solicit public comment, that's all
>> well and good, but you can do it with a proto on a-d, which is
>> probably more effective anyway. If this keeps up, we may need to
>> shorten the time window for pending proposals and/or levy fines. Sorry
>> for the rant, but it gets on my nerves having to deal with all these
>> proposals that will probably never actually help Agora by being
>> distributed for a vote.
>> 
>> -Aris
>> 
>> 
>> The proposal pool currently contains the following proposals:
>> 
>> IDAuthor(s) AI   Title
>> ---
>> pp1   P.S.S [1] 1.0  Agora's To-Do List (v2/ov1)
>> pp2   Ienpw III 1.0  Reader's Digest
>> pp3   Quazie1.7  Issuing Cards is secured...[2]
>> pp4   G., [3]   1.7  Betterer Pledges, (BBoRWCDaPWDaLoEWSWW)
>> pp5   Gaelan1.0  No Sneakiness
>> pp6   o, Aris   2.0  Deregistration and Assets
>> pp7   nichdel   1.2  Organization Integration and Stamp Collecting
>> pp8   Gaelan1.0  Sequential Numbering
>> pp9   Gaelan1.5  State of the Union
>> pp10  Gaelan, [4]   2.0  Judicial Reform v2
>> 
>> Legend: * : Proposal is pending.
>> 
>> [1] Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>> [2] ...with power threshold 1.7.
>> [3] Gaelan, Aris, 天火狐
>> [4] Aris, Quazie
>> 
>> The Pending List Price (PLP) is 6 shinies. The Pending Minimum Price (PMP)
>> is 5 shinies.
>> 
>> 
>> The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below.
>> 
>> //
>> ID: 7858
>> Title: Fast Resolution, now working
>> Adoption Index: 3.0
>> Author: Gaelan
>> Co-author(s):
>> 
>> 
>> Amend rule 107 “Initiating Agoran Decisions” by replacing {
>> The voting period lasts for 7 days. The minimum voting period for a decision
>> with at least two options is five days.
>> } with {
>> Unless specified by another rule with power greater than or equal to 2, the
>> voting period lasts for 7 days and the minimum voting period for a decision
>> with at least two options is five days.
>> }
>> 
>> Create rule "Fast Resolution" (Power 2) {
>> For the purposes of this rule, an Agoran Decision's Pertinent Information is
>> the set of all information that the vote collector must use to determine the
>> result of the decision.
>> 
>> If, for an Agoran Decison:
>> 
>> 1. It has enough votes so that its result cannot be changed by any 
>> combination
>> of votes from players that have not yet voted (assuming no new players
>> register and no votes are withdrawn), and
>> 2. None of its Pertinent Information has changed in the past 24 hours,
>> 
>> Then any player may cause its voting period to end immediately by
>> announcement.
>> }
>> 
>> //
>> ID: pp1
>> Title: Agora's To-Do List (v2/ov1)
>> Adoption index: 1.0
>> Author: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>> Co-author(s):
>> 
>> 
>> Enact a rule titled, "To-Do List", reading: "Any player MAY without two
>> objection add an item to the to-do list with a specified number of Shinies
>> associated with it. Any to-do list item must have a clear set of requirements
>> for completion. The to-do list shall be maintained by the Lister. Any person 
>> MAY
>> complete an item on the to-do list and claim the specified number of Shinies
>> associated with it by notifying the Lister of their completion of the task. 
>> If
>> the Lister agrees with the claimee, the Lister shall without two objection 
>> pay
>> the claimee the specified number of Shinies from Agora. Any disagreement
>> regarding completion shall be resolved via a CFJ. After an item has been
>> completed, the Lister shall remove it from the to-do list."
>> 
>> Enact a rule titled, "The Office of the Lister", reading: "The Lister
>> is an office; its holder is responsible for maintaining the to-do of
>> Agora.
>> 
>> The Lister's Weekly report includes the current state of the Agoran
>> to-do list and any recent events thereof."
>> 
>>