Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Herald Election Decision Initiation (for real this time, hopefully...)
I vote {Corona, PSS} and FOR the proposal, which I identify as 7981.
-Aris
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 5:55 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> I vote {Corona, PSS} and FOR the proposal.
>
> On 11/24/2017 8:52 PM, ATMunn wrote:
>>
>> right.
>>
>> CoE: The campaign proposal decision has to be in the same message as the
>> main decision.
>>
>> I accept my CoE hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the winner
>> of the Herald election.
>>
>> For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid options
>> are the candidates (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are
>> conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff.
>>
>> Currently, the candidates are Corona and PSS. As the election is
>> contested, any player still may become a candidate until the poll ends.
>>
>> I hereby distribute each listed campaign proposal, initiating the Agoran
>> Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector
>> is the Assessor, the quorum is 4 and the valid options are FOR and
>> AGAINST (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are conditionals).
>>
>>
>> Title: "History by Force"
>> Author: PSS
>> Co-author(s):
>> AI: 1
>> ID: 7973
>> Enact a new Rule "Miscellaneous Herald Duties", with the following text:
>> {
>> The Herald SHALL in eir weekly report include an interesting Agoran
>> fact and SHALL in eir monthly report include a short essay of any
>> authorship, regarding an aspect of Agoran history. Any player
>> publishing a thesis for a degree, related to Agoran history SHOULD
>> offer a summary for publication in the Herald's monthly report.
>>
>> The Herald SHALL in eir monthly report publish, with reasonable
>> effort, a summary of all theses written for the purpose of
>> receiving degrees, regardless of whether a degree was awarded.
>> The Herald SHOULD attempt to make theses available for reading.
>> }
>>
>>
>> On 11/24/2017 8:48 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>>>
>>> This has to be done in the same message as the other decision.
>>>
>>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Nov 24, 2017, at 8:46 PM, ATMunn wrote:
ugh I'm too lazy for my own good today
I accept PSS's CoE.
I hereby distribute each listed campaign proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector
is the Assessor, the quorum is 4 and the valid options are FOR and
AGAINST (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are conditionals).
Title: "History by Force"
Author: PSS
Co-author(s):
AI: 1
ID: 7973
Enact a new Rule "Miscellaneous Herald Duties", with the following text:
{
The Herald SHALL in eir weekly report include an interesting Agoran
fact and SHALL in eir monthly report include a short essay of any
authorship, regarding an aspect of Agoran history. Any player
publishing a thesis for a degree, related to Agoran history SHOULD
offer a summary for publication in the Herald's monthly report.
The Herald SHALL in eir monthly report publish, with reasonable
effort, a summary of all theses written for the purpose of
receiving degrees, regardless of whether a degree was awarded.
The Herald SHOULD attempt to make theses available for reading.
}
On 11/24/2017 8:33 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>
> CoE: I had a campaign proposal.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>>
>> On Nov 24, 2017, at 8:30 PM, ATMunn wrote:
>>
>> I accept my CoE.
>>
>> I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the winner of the
>> *Herald* election.
>>
>> For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid
>> options
>> are the candidates (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are
>> conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff.
>>
>> Currently, the candidates are Corona and PSS. As the election is
>> contested, any player still may become a candidate until the poll
>> ends.
>>
>> There were no campaign proposals.
>>
>> On 11/24/2017 8:28 PM, ATMunn wrote:
>>>
>>> crap. CoE: This should be for the Herald, not Referee.
>>> On 11/24/2017 8:26 PM, ATMunn wrote:
As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to
select the winner of the Referee election.
For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid
options
are the candidates (PRESENT is also alwa
BUS: Re: DIS: ATTN: Aris (Was: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Herald Election Decision Initiation (for real this time, hopefully...) )
This is an excellent idea in this proposal.
I vote (PSS, Corona) and FOR the proposal.
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> I vote {PSS, Corona} and FOR the proposal. Aris, please not the proposal that
> needs to be numbered. :)
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On Nov 24, 2017, at 8:52 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> >
> > right.
> >
> > CoE: The campaign proposal decision has to be in the same message as the
> > main decision.
> >
> > I accept my CoE hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the winner
> > of the Herald election.
> >
> > For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid options
> > are the candidates (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are
> > conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff.
> >
> > Currently, the candidates are Corona and PSS. As the election is
> > contested, any player still may become a candidate until the poll ends.
> >
> > I hereby distribute each listed campaign proposal, initiating the Agoran
> > Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector
> > is the Assessor, the quorum is 4 and the valid options are FOR and
> > AGAINST (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are conditionals).
> >
> >
> > Title: "History by Force"
> > Author: PSS
> > Co-author(s):
> > AI: 1
> > ID: 7973
> > Enact a new Rule "Miscellaneous Herald Duties", with the following text:
> > {
> >The Herald SHALL in eir weekly report include an interesting Agoran
> >fact and SHALL in eir monthly report include a short essay of any
> >authorship, regarding an aspect of Agoran history. Any player
> >publishing a thesis for a degree, related to Agoran history SHOULD
> >offer a summary for publication in the Herald's monthly report.
> >
> >The Herald SHALL in eir monthly report publish, with reasonable
> >effort, a summary of all theses written for the purpose of
> >receiving degrees, regardless of whether a degree was awarded.
> >The Herald SHOULD attempt to make theses available for reading.
> > }
> >
> >
> > On 11/24/2017 8:48 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> >> This has to be done in the same message as the other decision.
> >>
> >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> >>> On Nov 24, 2017, at 8:46 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> >>>
> >>> ugh I'm too lazy for my own good today
> >>>
> >>> I accept PSS's CoE.
> >>>
> >>> I hereby distribute each listed campaign proposal, initiating the Agoran
> >>> Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector
> >>> is the Assessor, the quorum is 4 and the valid options are FOR and
> >>> AGAINST (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are conditionals).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Title: "History by Force"
> >>> Author: PSS
> >>> Co-author(s):
> >>> AI: 1
> >>> ID: 7973
> >>> Enact a new Rule "Miscellaneous Herald Duties", with the following text:
> >>> {
> >>>The Herald SHALL in eir weekly report include an interesting Agoran
> >>>fact and SHALL in eir monthly report include a short essay of any
> >>>authorship, regarding an aspect of Agoran history. Any player
> >>>publishing a thesis for a degree, related to Agoran history SHOULD
> >>>offer a summary for publication in the Herald's monthly report.
> >>>
> >>>The Herald SHALL in eir monthly report publish, with reasonable
> >>>effort, a summary of all theses written for the purpose of
> >>>receiving degrees, regardless of whether a degree was awarded.
> >>>The Herald SHOULD attempt to make theses available for reading.
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 11/24/2017 8:33 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> CoE: I had a campaign proposal.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> > On Nov 24, 2017, at 8:30 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> >
> > I accept my CoE.
> >
> > I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the winner of the
> > *Herald* election.
> >
> > For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid options
> > are the candidates (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are
> > conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff.
> >
> > Currently, the candidates are Corona and PSS. As the election is
> > contested, any player still may become a candidate until the poll ends.
> >
> > There were no campaign proposals.
> >
> > On 11/24/2017 8:28 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> >> crap. CoE: This should be for the Herald, not Referee.
> >> On 11/24/2017 8:26 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> >>> As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate t
BUS: CFJ (Re: OFF: [ADoP] Herald Election Decision Initiation (for real this time, hopefully...))
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote:
CoE: The campaign proposal decision has to be in the same message as the
main decision.
I accept my CoE hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the winner
of the Herald election.
I note a possible bug was avoided here: IF AtMunn had also been Promotor
(or possibly Prime Minister?) then the previous erroneous distribution
would have been effective.
Although then it should no longer have been pending, rule 2445 still says
"Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, an Official proposal is always
pending." Um, I guess it's still that phrase that's the real problem.
I CFJ:
An Official Proposal is always pending, even after being retracted,
distributed or adopted.
(I might have made several CFJs, one for each subclaim, but that seemed
like overkill when they're all linked.)
Arguments:
Rule 2445 (power 1) says "Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, an
Official proposal is always pending." The first clause of the rule
implies that "pending" only applies to proposals in the Pool, but rule
2240 (power 3) implies that later clauses in a rule take precedence.
Retraction and distribution both remove a proposal from the Proposal Pool,
and are enabled by power 3 rules. Adoption shouldn't change anything.
Rule 2240/1 (Power=3.0)
No Cretans Need Apply
In a conflict between clauses of the same Rule, if exactly one
claims precedence over the other, then it takes precedence;
otherwise, the later clause takes precedence.
Rule 2445/10 (Power=1.0)
How to Pend a Proposal
Imminence is a switch, tracked by the Promotor, possessed by
proposals in the Proposal Pool, whose value is either "pending" or
"not pending" (default).
Any player CAN flip a specified proposal's imminence to "pending"
by announcement by:
a) spending 1 Action Point, OR
b) spending the current Pend Cost in shinies.
An Official Proposal is a proposal designated as such by the
Rules; generally official proposals that are created as part of an
Officer's duties. Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, an
Official proposal is always pending. Rules to the contrary
notwithstanding, players CANNOT claim rewards for the adoption of
an Official proposal.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid options
are the candidates (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are
conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff.
Currently, the candidates are Corona and PSS. As the election is
contested, any player still may become a candidate until the poll ends.
I hereby distribute each listed campaign proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector
is the Assessor, the quorum is 4 and the valid options are FOR and
AGAINST (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are conditionals).
Title: "History by Force"
Author: PSS
Co-author(s):
AI: 1
ID: 7973
Enact a new Rule "Miscellaneous Herald Duties", with the following text:
{
The Herald SHALL in eir weekly report include an interesting Agoran
fact and SHALL in eir monthly report include a short essay of any
authorship, regarding an aspect of Agoran history. Any player
publishing a thesis for a degree, related to Agoran history SHOULD
offer a summary for publication in the Herald's monthly report.
The Herald SHALL in eir monthly report publish, with reasonable
effort, a summary of all theses written for the purpose of
receiving degrees, regardless of whether a degree was awarded.
The Herald SHOULD attempt to make theses available for reading.
}
On 11/24/2017 8:48 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
This has to be done in the same message as the other decision.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
On Nov 24, 2017, at 8:46 PM, ATMunn wrote:
ugh I'm too lazy for my own good today
I accept PSS's CoE.
I hereby distribute each listed campaign proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector
is the Assessor, the quorum is 4 and the valid options are FOR and
AGAINST (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are conditionals).
Title: "History by Force"
Author: PSS
Co-author(s):
AI: 1
ID: 7973
Enact a new Rule "Miscellaneous Herald Duties", with the following text:
{
The Herald SHALL in eir weekly report include an interesting Agoran
fact and SHALL in eir monthly report include a short essay of any
authorship, regarding an aspect of Agoran history. Any player
publishing a thesis for a degree, related to Agoran history SHOULD
offer a summary for publication in the Herald's monthly report.
The Herald SHALL in ei
BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Herald Election Decision Initiation (for real this time, hopefully...)
I vote as Alexis does here.
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 at 20:52 ATMunn wrote:
>
>> right.
>>
>
> I vote for {Corona, PSS} and FOR the campaign proposal.
--
>From V.J. Rada
BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Herald Election Decision Initiation (for real this time, hopefully...)
I vote {Corona, PSS} and FOR the proposal.
On 11/24/2017 8:52 PM, ATMunn wrote:
right.
CoE: The campaign proposal decision has to be in the same message as the
main decision.
I accept my CoE hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the winner
of the Herald election.
For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid options
are the candidates (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are
conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff.
Currently, the candidates are Corona and PSS. As the election is
contested, any player still may become a candidate until the poll ends.
I hereby distribute each listed campaign proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector
is the Assessor, the quorum is 4 and the valid options are FOR and
AGAINST (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are conditionals).
Title: "History by Force"
Author: PSS
Co-author(s):
AI: 1
ID: 7973
Enact a new Rule "Miscellaneous Herald Duties", with the following text:
{
The Herald SHALL in eir weekly report include an interesting Agoran
fact and SHALL in eir monthly report include a short essay of any
authorship, regarding an aspect of Agoran history. Any player
publishing a thesis for a degree, related to Agoran history SHOULD
offer a summary for publication in the Herald's monthly report.
The Herald SHALL in eir monthly report publish, with reasonable
effort, a summary of all theses written for the purpose of
receiving degrees, regardless of whether a degree was awarded.
The Herald SHOULD attempt to make theses available for reading.
}
On 11/24/2017 8:48 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
This has to be done in the same message as the other decision.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
On Nov 24, 2017, at 8:46 PM, ATMunn wrote:
ugh I'm too lazy for my own good today
I accept PSS's CoE.
I hereby distribute each listed campaign proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector
is the Assessor, the quorum is 4 and the valid options are FOR and
AGAINST (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are conditionals).
Title: "History by Force"
Author: PSS
Co-author(s):
AI: 1
ID: 7973
Enact a new Rule "Miscellaneous Herald Duties", with the following text:
{
The Herald SHALL in eir weekly report include an interesting Agoran
fact and SHALL in eir monthly report include a short essay of any
authorship, regarding an aspect of Agoran history. Any player
publishing a thesis for a degree, related to Agoran history SHOULD
offer a summary for publication in the Herald's monthly report.
The Herald SHALL in eir monthly report publish, with reasonable
effort, a summary of all theses written for the purpose of
receiving degrees, regardless of whether a degree was awarded.
The Herald SHOULD attempt to make theses available for reading.
}
On 11/24/2017 8:33 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
CoE: I had a campaign proposal.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
On Nov 24, 2017, at 8:30 PM, ATMunn wrote:
I accept my CoE.
I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the winner of the
*Herald* election.
For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid options
are the candidates (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are
conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff.
Currently, the candidates are Corona and PSS. As the election is
contested, any player still may become a candidate until the poll ends.
There were no campaign proposals.
On 11/24/2017 8:28 PM, ATMunn wrote:
crap. CoE: This should be for the Herald, not Referee.
On 11/24/2017 8:26 PM, ATMunn wrote:
As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to
select the winner of the Referee election.
For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid options
are the candidates (PRESENT is also always a valid vote, as are
conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff.
Currently, the candidates are Corona, PSS and o. As the election is
contested, any player still may become a candidate until the poll ends.
There were no campaign proposals.
BUS: Re: ATTN: Aris (Was: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Herald Election Decision Initiation (for real this time, hopefully...) )
TTttPF
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Nov 24, 2017, at 8:54 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
>
> I vote {PSS, Corona} and FOR the proposal. Aris, please not the proposal that
> needs to be numbered. :)
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>> On Nov 24, 2017, at 8:52 PM, ATMunn wrote:
>>
>> right.
>>
>> CoE: The campaign proposal decision has to be in the same message as the
>> main decision.
>>
>> I accept my CoE hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the winner
>> of the Herald election.
>>
>> For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid options
>> are the candidates (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are
>> conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff.
>>
>> Currently, the candidates are Corona and PSS. As the election is
>> contested, any player still may become a candidate until the poll ends.
>>
>> I hereby distribute each listed campaign proposal, initiating the Agoran
>> Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector
>> is the Assessor, the quorum is 4 and the valid options are FOR and
>> AGAINST (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are conditionals).
>>
>>
>> Title: "History by Force"
>> Author: PSS
>> Co-author(s):
>> AI: 1
>> ID: 7973
>> Enact a new Rule "Miscellaneous Herald Duties", with the following text:
>> {
>> The Herald SHALL in eir weekly report include an interesting Agoran
>> fact and SHALL in eir monthly report include a short essay of any
>> authorship, regarding an aspect of Agoran history. Any player
>> publishing a thesis for a degree, related to Agoran history SHOULD
>> offer a summary for publication in the Herald's monthly report.
>>
>> The Herald SHALL in eir monthly report publish, with reasonable
>> effort, a summary of all theses written for the purpose of
>> receiving degrees, regardless of whether a degree was awarded.
>> The Herald SHOULD attempt to make theses available for reading.
>> }
>>
>>
>> On 11/24/2017 8:48 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>>> This has to be done in the same message as the other decision.
>>>
>>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
On Nov 24, 2017, at 8:46 PM, ATMunn wrote:
ugh I'm too lazy for my own good today
I accept PSS's CoE.
I hereby distribute each listed campaign proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector
is the Assessor, the quorum is 4 and the valid options are FOR and
AGAINST (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are conditionals).
Title: "History by Force"
Author: PSS
Co-author(s):
AI: 1
ID: 7973
Enact a new Rule "Miscellaneous Herald Duties", with the following text:
{
The Herald SHALL in eir weekly report include an interesting Agoran
fact and SHALL in eir monthly report include a short essay of any
authorship, regarding an aspect of Agoran history. Any player
publishing a thesis for a degree, related to Agoran history SHOULD
offer a summary for publication in the Herald's monthly report.
The Herald SHALL in eir monthly report publish, with reasonable
effort, a summary of all theses written for the purpose of
receiving degrees, regardless of whether a degree was awarded.
The Herald SHOULD attempt to make theses available for reading.
}
On 11/24/2017 8:33 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> CoE: I had a campaign proposal.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>> On Nov 24, 2017, at 8:30 PM, ATMunn wrote:
>>
>> I accept my CoE.
>>
>> I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the winner of the
>> *Herald* election.
>>
>> For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid options
>> are the candidates (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are
>> conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff.
>>
>> Currently, the candidates are Corona and PSS. As the election is
>> contested, any player still may become a candidate until the poll ends.
>>
>> There were no campaign proposals.
>>
>> On 11/24/2017 8:28 PM, ATMunn wrote:
>>> crap. CoE: This should be for the Herald, not Referee.
>>> On 11/24/2017 8:26 PM, ATMunn wrote:
As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to
select the winner of the Referee election.
For this decision, the
Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Herald Election Decision Initiation
I vote FOR.
On 11/24/2017 8:46 PM, ATMunn wrote:
ugh I'm too lazy for my own good today
I accept PSS's CoE.
I hereby distribute each listed campaign proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector
is the Assessor, the quorum is 4 and the valid options are FOR and
AGAINST (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are conditionals).
Title: "History by Force"
Author: PSS
Co-author(s):
AI: 1
ID: 7973
Enact a new Rule "Miscellaneous Herald Duties", with the following text:
{
The Herald SHALL in eir weekly report include an interesting Agoran
fact and SHALL in eir monthly report include a short essay of any
authorship, regarding an aspect of Agoran history. Any player
publishing a thesis for a degree, related to Agoran history SHOULD
offer a summary for publication in the Herald's monthly report.
The Herald SHALL in eir monthly report publish, with reasonable
effort, a summary of all theses written for the purpose of
receiving degrees, regardless of whether a degree was awarded.
The Herald SHOULD attempt to make theses available for reading.
}
On 11/24/2017 8:33 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
CoE: I had a campaign proposal.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
On Nov 24, 2017, at 8:30 PM, ATMunn wrote:
I accept my CoE.
I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the winner of the
*Herald* election.
For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid options
are the candidates (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are
conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff.
Currently, the candidates are Corona and PSS. As the election is
contested, any player still may become a candidate until the poll ends.
There were no campaign proposals.
On 11/24/2017 8:28 PM, ATMunn wrote:
crap. CoE: This should be for the Herald, not Referee.
On 11/24/2017 8:26 PM, ATMunn wrote:
As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to
select the winner of the Referee election.
For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid options
are the candidates (PRESENT is also always a valid vote, as are
conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff.
Currently, the candidates are Corona, PSS and o. As the election is
contested, any player still may become a candidate until the poll ends.
There were no campaign proposals.
BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Herald Election Decision Initiation
CoE: I had a campaign proposal. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Nov 24, 2017, at 8:30 PM, ATMunn wrote: > > I accept my CoE. > > I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the winner of the > *Herald* election. > > For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid options > are the candidates (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are > conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff. > > Currently, the candidates are Corona and PSS. As the election is > contested, any player still may become a candidate until the poll ends. > > There were no campaign proposals. > > On 11/24/2017 8:28 PM, ATMunn wrote: >> crap. CoE: This should be for the Herald, not Referee. >> On 11/24/2017 8:26 PM, ATMunn wrote: >>> As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to >>> select the winner of the Referee election. >>> >>> For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid options >>> are the candidates (PRESENT is also always a valid vote, as are >>> conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff. >>> >>> Currently, the candidates are Corona, PSS and o. As the election is >>> contested, any player still may become a candidate until the poll ends. >>> >>> There were no campaign proposals. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Herald Election Decision Initiation
I vote {Corona, PSS}
On 11/24/2017 8:30 PM, ATMunn wrote:
I accept my CoE.
I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the winner of the
*Herald* election.
For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid options
are the candidates (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are
conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff.
Currently, the candidates are Corona and PSS. As the election is
contested, any player still may become a candidate until the poll ends.
There were no campaign proposals.
On 11/24/2017 8:28 PM, ATMunn wrote:
crap. CoE: This should be for the Herald, not Referee.
On 11/24/2017 8:26 PM, ATMunn wrote:
As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to
select the winner of the Referee election.
For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid options
are the candidates (PRESENT is also always a valid vote, as are
conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff.
Currently, the candidates are Corona, PSS and o. As the election is
contested, any player still may become a candidate until the poll ends.
There were no campaign proposals.
BUS: Re: [ADoP] Referee Election Decision Initiation
crap. CoE: This should be for the Herald, not Referee. On 11/24/2017 8:26 PM, ATMunn wrote: As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the winner of the Referee election. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid options are the candidates (PRESENT is also always a valid vote, as are conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff. Currently, the candidates are Corona, PSS and o. As the election is contested, any player still may become a candidate until the poll ends. There were no campaign proposals.
Re: BUS: [Contract] MiniNomic
I vote YAY on this Amendment Proposal.
On 11/24/17, ATMunn wrote:
> I just realized that votes cannot be changed.
>
> I Propose an Amendment to add the following mutable text:
> {
> Any Voter who has already cast a vote on an amendment proposal CAN
> change eir vote by announcement, changing it to YAY if it was NAY
> or to NAY if it was YAY.
> }
>
> I vote YAY on this Amendment Proposal.
>
> On 11/24/2017 10:58 AM, ATMunn wrote:
>> I cause the ACU to pay me 1 shiny by destroying 10 of my bills. I create
>> the following contract, entitled "MiniNomic", paying 1 shiny to Agora to
>> do so:
>>
>>
>> ---IMMUTABLE SECTION
>> Text in the section of this contract below the dividing line labeled
>> "IMMUTABLE SECTION" is considered immutable. Text below the dividing
>> line labeled "MUTABLE SECTION" is considered mutable.
>>
>> Any player CAN become a party (or cease to be a party) to this contract
>> by announcement.
>>
>> Amendment Proposals are a type of fixed asset, which can only be owned
>> by this contract. This contract is willing to receive Amendment
>> Proposals.
>>
>> Any party to this contract CAN cause an Amendment Proposal to be created
>> in this contract's possession, by announcement, specifying the amendment
>> e wishes to make. This is known as Proposing an Amendment.
>>
>> Immutable text CANNOT be amended. Instead, in order for a block of
>> immutable text to be amended, it must first be moved to the mutable
>> section. This is known as transmutation. Transmutation can also consist
>> of moving a block of mutable text to the immutable section.
>>
>> A valid amendment is transmutation of a block of immutable text to
>> mutable text or vice versa, or deletion, changing, or adding of mutable
>> text. An invalid amendment CANNOT be made.
>>
>> After a valid amendment is proposed, a voting period for that amendment
>> begins. All parties to this contract (including the party who proposed
>> the amendment) are considered Voters. Any Voter CAN cast a valid vote on
>> an amendment by announcement. Valid votes are YAY and NAY. All Voters
>> SHALL cast valid votes on amendments in a timely fashion after they are
>> proposed.
>>
>> After 7 days have passed from the proposing of an amendment, no more
>> votes can be cast, and any party CAN resolve the vote by announcement.
>> When the vote is resolved for an Amendment Proposal, the Amendment
>> Proposal is destroyed, and if more than half of the votes (rounded up)
>> were YAY, then the Proposal passes and the amendment is made. Otherwise,
>> the Proposal fails, and nothing happens.
>> MUTABLE SECTION-
>
Re: BUS: [Contract] MiniNomic
I just realized that votes cannot be changed.
I Propose an Amendment to add the following mutable text:
{
Any Voter who has already cast a vote on an amendment proposal CAN
change eir vote by announcement, changing it to YAY if it was NAY
or to NAY if it was YAY.
}
I vote YAY on this Amendment Proposal.
On 11/24/2017 10:58 AM, ATMunn wrote:
I cause the ACU to pay me 1 shiny by destroying 10 of my bills. I create
the following contract, entitled "MiniNomic", paying 1 shiny to Agora to
do so:
---IMMUTABLE SECTION
Text in the section of this contract below the dividing line labeled
"IMMUTABLE SECTION" is considered immutable. Text below the dividing
line labeled "MUTABLE SECTION" is considered mutable.
Any player CAN become a party (or cease to be a party) to this contract
by announcement.
Amendment Proposals are a type of fixed asset, which can only be owned
by this contract. This contract is willing to receive Amendment
Proposals.
Any party to this contract CAN cause an Amendment Proposal to be created
in this contract's possession, by announcement, specifying the amendment
e wishes to make. This is known as Proposing an Amendment.
Immutable text CANNOT be amended. Instead, in order for a block of
immutable text to be amended, it must first be moved to the mutable
section. This is known as transmutation. Transmutation can also consist
of moving a block of mutable text to the immutable section.
A valid amendment is transmutation of a block of immutable text to
mutable text or vice versa, or deletion, changing, or adding of mutable
text. An invalid amendment CANNOT be made.
After a valid amendment is proposed, a voting period for that amendment
begins. All parties to this contract (including the party who proposed
the amendment) are considered Voters. Any Voter CAN cast a valid vote on
an amendment by announcement. Valid votes are YAY and NAY. All Voters
SHALL cast valid votes on amendments in a timely fashion after they are
proposed.
After 7 days have passed from the proposing of an amendment, no more
votes can be cast, and any party CAN resolve the vote by announcement.
When the vote is resolved for an Amendment Proposal, the Amendment
Proposal is destroyed, and if more than half of the votes (rounded up)
were YAY, then the Proposal passes and the amendment is made. Otherwise,
the Proposal fails, and nothing happens.
MUTABLE SECTION-
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Contract] MiniNomic
I vote YAY on both of these. On 11/24/2017 11:39 AM, Corona wrote: I become party to MiniNomic. I create the following Amendment Proposal in MiniNomic's possession, to preclude some possible future scams: [A player CANNOT become a party to MiniNomic if e voluntarily ceased to be a party less 24 hours ago.] I also create the following Amendment Proposal in MiniNomic's possession, to get a currency and win conditions (boring initially, as in P. Suber's original Nomic ruleset): [Jade is a currency. MiniNomic is willing to receive Jade. At the beginning of every Agoran week, every party to MiniNomic receives 100 Jade. MiniNomic Wins are a fixed currency. When a player transfers 10 000 Jade to MiniNomic for the sole and explicit purpose of obtaining a MiniNomic Win, one MiniNomic Win is created in eir possession.] On 11/24/17, ATMunn wrote: I cause the ACU to pay me 1 shiny by destroying 10 of my bills. I create the following contract, entitled "MiniNomic", paying 1 shiny to Agora to do so: ---IMMUTABLE SECTION Text in the section of this contract below the dividing line labeled "IMMUTABLE SECTION" is considered immutable. Text below the dividing line labeled "MUTABLE SECTION" is considered mutable. Any player CAN become a party (or cease to be a party) to this contract by announcement. Amendment Proposals are a type of fixed asset, which can only be owned by this contract. This contract is willing to receive Amendment Proposals. Any party to this contract CAN cause an Amendment Proposal to be created in this contract's possession, by announcement, specifying the amendment e wishes to make. This is known as Proposing an Amendment. Immutable text CANNOT be amended. Instead, in order for a block of immutable text to be amended, it must first be moved to the mutable section. This is known as transmutation. Transmutation can also consist of moving a block of mutable text to the immutable section. A valid amendment is transmutation of a block of immutable text to mutable text or vice versa, or deletion, changing, or adding of mutable text. An invalid amendment CANNOT be made. After a valid amendment is proposed, a voting period for that amendment begins. All parties to this contract (including the party who proposed the amendment) are considered Voters. Any Voter CAN cast a valid vote on an amendment by announcement. Valid votes are YAY and NAY. All Voters SHALL cast valid votes on amendments in a timely fashion after they are proposed. After 7 days have passed from the proposing of an amendment, no more votes can be cast, and any party CAN resolve the vote by announcement. When the vote is resolved for an Amendment Proposal, the Amendment Proposal is destroyed, and if more than half of the votes (rounded up) were YAY, then the Proposal passes and the amendment is made. Otherwise, the Proposal fails, and nothing happens. MUTABLE SECTION-
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Contract] MiniNomic
Ttttpf On 11/24/17, Corona wrote: > I become party to MiniNomic. > > I create the following Amendment Proposal in MiniNomic's possession, > to preclude some possible future scams: > > [A player CANNOT become a party to MiniNomic if e voluntarily ceased > to be a party less 24 hours ago.] > > I also create the following Amendment Proposal in MiniNomic's > possession, to get a currency and win conditions (boring initially, as > in P. Suber's original Nomic ruleset): > > [Jade is a currency. MiniNomic is willing to receive Jade. At the > beginning of every Agoran week, every party to MiniNomic receives 100 > Jade. > > MiniNomic Wins are a fixed currency. > When a player transfers 10 000 Jade to MiniNomic for the sole and > explicit purpose of obtaining a MiniNomic Win, one MiniNomic Win is > created in eir possession.] > > On 11/24/17, ATMunn wrote: >> I cause the ACU to pay me 1 shiny by destroying 10 of my bills. I create >> the following contract, entitled "MiniNomic", paying 1 shiny to Agora to >> do so: >> >> >> ---IMMUTABLE SECTION >> Text in the section of this contract below the dividing line labeled >> "IMMUTABLE SECTION" is considered immutable. Text below the dividing >> line labeled "MUTABLE SECTION" is considered mutable. >> >> Any player CAN become a party (or cease to be a party) to this contract >> by announcement. >> >> Amendment Proposals are a type of fixed asset, which can only be owned >> by this contract. This contract is willing to receive Amendment >> Proposals. >> >> Any party to this contract CAN cause an Amendment Proposal to be created >> in this contract's possession, by announcement, specifying the amendment >> e wishes to make. This is known as Proposing an Amendment. >> >> Immutable text CANNOT be amended. Instead, in order for a block of >> immutable text to be amended, it must first be moved to the mutable >> section. This is known as transmutation. Transmutation can also consist >> of moving a block of mutable text to the immutable section. >> >> A valid amendment is transmutation of a block of immutable text to >> mutable text or vice versa, or deletion, changing, or adding of mutable >> text. An invalid amendment CANNOT be made. >> >> After a valid amendment is proposed, a voting period for that amendment >> begins. All parties to this contract (including the party who proposed >> the amendment) are considered Voters. Any Voter CAN cast a valid vote on >> an amendment by announcement. Valid votes are YAY and NAY. All Voters >> SHALL cast valid votes on amendments in a timely fashion after they are >> proposed. >> >> After 7 days have passed from the proposing of an amendment, no more >> votes can be cast, and any party CAN resolve the vote by announcement. >> When the vote is resolved for an Amendment Proposal, the Amendment >> Proposal is destroyed, and if more than half of the votes (rounded up) >> were YAY, then the Proposal passes and the amendment is made. Otherwise, >> the Proposal fails, and nothing happens. >> MUTABLE SECTION- >> >
BUS: [Contract] MiniNomic
I cause the ACU to pay me 1 shiny by destroying 10 of my bills. I create the following contract, entitled "MiniNomic", paying 1 shiny to Agora to do so: ---IMMUTABLE SECTION Text in the section of this contract below the dividing line labeled "IMMUTABLE SECTION" is considered immutable. Text below the dividing line labeled "MUTABLE SECTION" is considered mutable. Any player CAN become a party (or cease to be a party) to this contract by announcement. Amendment Proposals are a type of fixed asset, which can only be owned by this contract. This contract is willing to receive Amendment Proposals. Any party to this contract CAN cause an Amendment Proposal to be created in this contract's possession, by announcement, specifying the amendment e wishes to make. This is known as Proposing an Amendment. Immutable text CANNOT be amended. Instead, in order for a block of immutable text to be amended, it must first be moved to the mutable section. This is known as transmutation. Transmutation can also consist of moving a block of mutable text to the immutable section. A valid amendment is transmutation of a block of immutable text to mutable text or vice versa, or deletion, changing, or adding of mutable text. An invalid amendment CANNOT be made. After a valid amendment is proposed, a voting period for that amendment begins. All parties to this contract (including the party who proposed the amendment) are considered Voters. Any Voter CAN cast a valid vote on an amendment by announcement. Valid votes are YAY and NAY. All Voters SHALL cast valid votes on amendments in a timely fashion after they are proposed. After 7 days have passed from the proposing of an amendment, no more votes can be cast, and any party CAN resolve the vote by announcement. When the vote is resolved for an Amendment Proposal, the Amendment Proposal is destroyed, and if more than half of the votes (rounded up) were YAY, then the Proposal passes and the amendment is made. Otherwise, the Proposal fails, and nothing happens. MUTABLE SECTION-
