Re: [@Promotor] [Honour] Re: BUS: Publication of potential rule change
at 9:34 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business
wrote:
> I Grumble Loudly at omd.
I Smirk.
> I change my vote on 8483 to {If this proposal would be ADOPTED if this
> vote (and any other conditional votes that, if not for this
> parenthetical, would directly or indirectly depend on my vote in such a
> way that causes my vote to become inextricable) resolved to AGAINST, then
> FOR. Otherwise, AGAINST.}
I change my vote on 8483 to {If Gaelan cast a valid vote before I cast this
vote that was substantially equivalent to the above except for not having a
parenthetical, then denounce Gaelan. Otherwise, FOR.}
[@Promotor] [Honour] Re: BUS: Publication of potential rule change
> On Aug 6, 2020, at 9:10 PM, omd via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> I change my vote to {AGAINST if all of humanity is destroyed before the end
> of the voting period, otherwise FOR}.
I Grumble Loudly at omd.
I change my vote on 8483 to {If this proposal would be ADOPTED if this vote
(and any other conditional votes that, if not for this parenthetical, would
directly or indirectly depend on my vote in such a way that causes my vote to
become inextricable) resolved to AGAINST, then FOR. Otherwise, AGAINST.}
(This is identical in overall intent to my previous vote. However, it handles
other conditionals more robustly; the previous wording just decided not to
bother with anything other than ENDORSE, which meant that votes like omd's
could cause my vote to malfunction.)
Notice of Honour:
-1 omd for making me do this properly
+1 Jason for dealing with our BS
Gaelan
Re: BUS: Publication of potential rule change
at 8:02 PM, omd wrote:
> Sounds interesting. I vote FOR Proposal 8483.
I change my vote to {AGAINST if all of humanity is destroyed before the end
of the voting period, otherwise FOR}.
Re: [@Assessor] BUS: Publication of potential rule change
On 2020-08-06 01:55, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
I change my vote on proposal on 8483 to {If this proposal would be ADOPTED if
this vote (and any other non-ENDORSE conditionals) resolved to AGAINST, then
FOR. Otherwise, AGAINST.}
(TLDR: AGAINST, unless it'll pass anyway, in which case FOR)
Gaelan
I change my vote on proposal 8483 to that same same conditional ({If
this proposal would be ADOPTED if this vote (and any other non-ENDORSE
conditionals) resolved to AGAINST, then FOR. Otherwise, AGAINST.}).
--
Falsifian
Re: BUS: @Treasuror Quickexchange use
I pay a fee of 47 Legislative Credits to Dragon QuickExchange to recieve
one Pendant.
I believe Dragon QuickExchange currently owns:
* Two Victory Points
* Two Blot-B-Gones
* Five Pendants
* One Extra Vote
I intend without objection to ratify the following document describing
ownership of credits backed by Dragon QuickExchange (I hope that counts
as a "scope"):
{
Ownership of Credits backed by Dragon QuickExchange is as follows:
Victory Credits: Falsifian owns 88.
Justice Credits: Falsifian owns 88.
Legislative Credits: Falsifian owns 129; R. Lee owns 88.
Voting Credits: Falsifian owns 44.
}
--
Falsifian
Fwd: BUS: Publication of potential rule change
TTttPF Begin forwarded message: > From: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > Date: August 6, 2020 at 16:47:45 EDT > To: agora-discuss...@agoranomic.org > Subject: BUS: Publication of potential rule change > > Since it’s going to happen, I do as well > >>> On Aug 6, 2020, at 14:05, Jason Cobb via agora-business >>> wrote: >>> >>> On 8/5/20 2:11 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: >>> The below document, labelled THE MYSTERY DOCUMENT, contains the text of a >>> rule change. The rule change will be incorporated by reference into the >>> effects of proposal 8483 (quoted below), and the rule change will take >>> effect if and when that proposal takes effect. The rule change text, along >>> with this specification of the method to be used for the rule change, is >>> being published in accordance with the 'at least 4 days' clause of Rule 105. >> >> >> Since it seems to be all the rage these days (and I do need a violet >> ribbon), I change my vote on Proposal 8483 to FOR. >> >> -- >> Jason Cobb >>
BUS: Lets see if you can do this every week
I create the following proposal Title why are we passing these Ai 1 Text If R. Lee has published a doument to the public forum labelled DOING STUFF before the end of the voting period of this proposal, make the changes specified in that document.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Publication of potential rule change
TTttPF > On Aug 6, 2020, at 16:48, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion > wrote: >
BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8478-8487
On 8/2/2020 2:58 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote: > ID Author(s)AITitle > --- > 8478*^ Jason, nix, G. 3.0 another talismans fix > 8479j^ nix, Aris, PSS, ATMunn 1.7 Competitive Finger Pointing v2 > 8480e^ Jason1.0 Generic welcome package fix > 8481*^ Trigon, Aris 3.0 If it's not pending we don't care v2 > 8482f^ Trigon, ATMunn 1.0 Offices are complex v2 > 8483l^ G. 1.0 a minor adjustment > 8484*^ Murphy, CB, Aris 3.0 Clarify asset ownership > 8485*^ Gaelan, Aris 3.0 Eternal Personhood > 8486* Jason, omd 3.0 Fee-based de-escalation > 8487*^ Murphy, R. Lee 3.0 Simpler ribbon switches I vote FOR each of the above decisions. On behalf of twg, I vote FOR each of the above decisions. -G.
Re: BUS: [Dragon] Pendant Extraction
On 2020-08-03 21:11, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
I submit the following Ordinary Proposal to the Dragon Corporation:
[informal title: Pendant Extraction]
{
Under this proposal, the President is authorized to once perform the
following actions, provided e does so in order, in the same message, and
with no intervening actions:
{
1. Transfer 8 legislative cards from the Dragon Corporation to emself.
2. Pay the 8 legislative cards as two sets of four, earning a total of
20 pendants.
3. Transfer 6 pendants to Jason.
4. Transfer 1 pendant to every other shareholder, other than emself.
5. Transfer all remaining pendants, except for two, to the Dragon
Corporation.
}
}
I vote FOR this proposal.
I vote FOR it too.
--
Falsifian
Re: BUS: Publication of potential rule change
On 8/5/20 2:11 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: > The below document, labelled THE MYSTERY DOCUMENT, contains the text of a > rule change. The rule change will be incorporated by reference into the > effects of proposal 8483 (quoted below), and the rule change will take > effect if and when that proposal takes effect. The rule change text, along > with this specification of the method to be used for the rule change, is > being published in accordance with the 'at least 4 days' clause of Rule 105. Since it seems to be all the rage these days (and I do need a violet ribbon), I change my vote on Proposal 8483 to FOR. -- Jason Cobb
Re: BUS: Publication of potential rule change
I think I'm already FORing everything but just in case: I vote FOR to all Proposals that can be currently voted for. On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 5:03 AM omd via agora-business < agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > at 11:11 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business > > wrote: > > > The below document, labelled THE MYSTERY DOCUMENT, contains the text of a > > rule change. The rule change will be incorporated by reference into the > > effects of proposal 8483 (quoted below), and the rule change will take > > effect if and when that proposal takes effect. The rule change text, > along > > with this specification of the method to be used for the rule change, is > > being published in accordance with the 'at least 4 days' clause of Rule > > 105. > > Sounds interesting. I vote FOR Proposal 8483. > >
