Re: BUS: I wish to register
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 11:46 PM shelvacu via agora-business < agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > I wish to register to become a player. If my registration is successful, > I cause myself to receive one Welcome Package and announce that it is my > Agoran Birthday! How exciting. I... don't think we've ever considered that a player's day of registration is their Birthday without waiting a year before. I suppose that's a feature, not a bug? Welcome to Agora! I grant the player who registered above 3 coins. What would you like to be known as? -Aris
BUS: I wish to register
I wish to register to become a player. If my registration is successful, I cause myself to receive one Welcome Package and announce that it is my Agoran Birthday! How exciting.
BUS: I can give a voting card away as coopor
tell me why i should give it to you -- >From R. Lee
Re: [@Promotor] [Honour] Re: BUS: Publication of potential rule change
It's clearly going to pass, why go through all of the trouble of setting up a contract? I'm interested in whether what Gaelan and I are trying to do can be done. Can you cast a vote that causes me to vote AGAINST with the proposal still passing? I think it's impossible with the contract, but I'm not sure. -- Falsifian
Re: [@Promotor] [Honour] Re: BUS: Publication of potential rule change
On 8/7/20 8:33 PM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
> On 2020-08-07 05:28, omd via agora-business wrote:
>> at 9:34 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I Grumble Loudly at omd.
>> I Smirk.
>>
>>> I change my vote on 8483 to {If this proposal would be ADOPTED if this
>>> vote (and any other conditional votes that, if not for this
>>> parenthetical, would directly or indirectly depend on my vote in such a
>>> way that causes my vote to become inextricable) resolved to AGAINST, then
>>> FOR. Otherwise, AGAINST.}
>> I change my vote on 8483 to {If Gaelan cast a valid vote before I cast this
>> vote that was substantially equivalent to the above except for not having a
>> parenthetical, then denounce Gaelan. Otherwise, FOR.}
> I change my vote on Proposal 8483 to:
> { If Proposal 8483 would be adopted even if all parties to the Foot
> Draggers Union voted AGAINST it, then FOR. Otherwise, AGAINST. }
>
> I agree to the following contract, which I titled the Foot Draggers Union:
>
> {{
>
> Anyone whose vote on Proposal 8483 is
>
> { If Proposal 8483 would be adopted even if all parties to the Foot
> Draggers Union voted AGAINST it, then FOR. Otherwise, AGAINST. }
>
> CAN join this contract by announcement. Any party who changes their vote
> on Proposal 8483 ceases to be a party.
>
> }}
>
> Note: the proposal was distributed 2020-08-02 at 21:58.
>
It's clearly going to pass, why go through all of the trouble of setting
up a contract?
--
Jason Cobb
@Notary @Assessor Re: BUS: Publication of potential rule change
I change my vote on 8483 to {If Gaelan cast a valid vote before I cast
this
vote that was substantially equivalent to the above except for not
having a
parenthetical, then denounce Gaelan. Otherwise, FOR.}
I change my vote on Proposal 8483 to:
{ If Proposal 8483 would be adopted even if all parties to the Foot
Draggers Union voted AGAINST it, then FOR. Otherwise, AGAINST. }
I agree to the following contract, which I titled the Foot Draggers Union:
{{
Anyone whose vote on Proposal 8483 is
{ If Proposal 8483 would be adopted even if all parties to the Foot
Draggers Union voted AGAINST it, then FOR. Otherwise, AGAINST. }
CAN join this contract by announcement. Any party who changes their vote
on Proposal 8483 ceases to be a party.
}}
Note: the proposal was distributed 2020-08-02 at 21:58.
(Flagging Notary and Assessor.)
--
Falsifian
Re: [@Promotor] [Honour] Re: BUS: Publication of potential rule change
On 2020-08-07 05:28, omd via agora-business wrote:
at 9:34 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business
wrote:
I Grumble Loudly at omd.
I Smirk.
I change my vote on 8483 to {If this proposal would be ADOPTED if this
vote (and any other conditional votes that, if not for this
parenthetical, would directly or indirectly depend on my vote in such a
way that causes my vote to become inextricable) resolved to AGAINST, then
FOR. Otherwise, AGAINST.}
I change my vote on 8483 to {If Gaelan cast a valid vote before I cast this
vote that was substantially equivalent to the above except for not having a
parenthetical, then denounce Gaelan. Otherwise, FOR.}
I change my vote on Proposal 8483 to:
{ If Proposal 8483 would be adopted even if all parties to the Foot
Draggers Union voted AGAINST it, then FOR. Otherwise, AGAINST. }
I agree to the following contract, which I titled the Foot Draggers Union:
{{
Anyone whose vote on Proposal 8483 is
{ If Proposal 8483 would be adopted even if all parties to the Foot
Draggers Union voted AGAINST it, then FOR. Otherwise, AGAINST. }
CAN join this contract by announcement. Any party who changes their vote
on Proposal 8483 ceases to be a party.
}}
Note: the proposal was distributed 2020-08-02 at 21:58.
--
Falsifian
Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] August zombie auction
TTttPF Gaelan > On Aug 7, 2020, at 3:40 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > I bid 2 coins. > > Gaelan > >>> On Aug 7, 2020, at 2:40 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business >>> wrote: >>> >>> On 8/7/20 5:38 PM, Falsifian via agora-official wrote: >>> This auction has four lots, ordered as follows: >>> >>> 1. The talisman of D. Margaux >>> 2. The talisman of Baron von Vaderham >>> 3. The talisman of sukil >>> 4. The talisman of Telnaior >>> >> >> I bid the grand sum of 1 coin. >> >> -- >> Jason Cobb >>
BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] August zombie auction
On 8/7/20 5:38 PM, Falsifian via agora-official wrote: > This auction has four lots, ordered as follows: > > 1. The talisman of D. Margaux > 2. The talisman of Baron von Vaderham > 3. The talisman of sukil > 4. The talisman of Telnaior > I bid the grand sum of 1 coin. -- Jason Cobb
Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] [Regulations] Intent to promulguate auction regulations
On 8/7/20 11:56 AM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote: > On 2020-08-04 07:00, Reuben Staley via agora-official wrote: >> My last drafts of Auction Regulations got no feedback. I am taking that >> to mean that they are faultless. I intend, with 2 Agoran support, to >> promulguate the following auction regulations (each method being its own >> regulation) as I am authorized to do by Rule 2545/3 "Auctions". > I support. > > (Sorry, I somehow missed until now that this actually requires us to do > something. I thought of it just now because I have to start a zombie > auction by the end of the day. I may just use a copy of this draft if > you haven't enacted them yet.) > Err.. as do I. -- Jason Cobb
BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] [Regulations] Intent to promulguate auction regulations
On 2020-08-04 07:00, Reuben Staley via agora-official wrote: My last drafts of Auction Regulations got no feedback. I am taking that to mean that they are faultless. I intend, with 2 Agoran support, to promulguate the following auction regulations (each method being its own regulation) as I am authorized to do by Rule 2545/3 "Auctions". I support. (Sorry, I somehow missed until now that this actually requires us to do something. I thought of it just now because I have to start a zombie auction by the end of the day. I may just use a copy of this draft if you haven't enacted them yet.) -- Falsifian
