I vote as follows:
8837 (Is this a hard decision?): AGAINST
8838 (Kickstarter): AGAINST
8839 (Not so hard decision): AGAINST
8840 (Cleanliness security): PRESENT
8841 (Spivak Standardization Act v2): PRESENT
8842 (Losing Focus): FOR
8843 (Time B Safe): AGAINST
8844 (Fix dreams): FOR
8845 (Onicers): AGAINST
8846 (The Cheepening): FOR
8847 (Bird Powerup): PRESENT
8848 (Goals): AGAINST
On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 1:13 AM secretsnail9 via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW
>
> If you vote on a proposal, please edit this spreadsheet with your votes:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jzzyipV-YFQwzRC-WxkOrOnjVLee-xH9NWC2ixf5K-8/edit?usp=sharing
>
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it,
> and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote
> collector
> is the Assessor, the quorum is 7, the voting method is AI-majority, and the
> valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are
> conditional votes).
>
>
> ID Author(s) AITitle
> ---
> 8837~ 4st 1.0 Is this a hard decision?
> 8838~ Murphy 1.0 Kickstarter
> 8839* 4st 3.0 Not so hard decision
> 8840* Jason 3.0 Cleanliness security
> 8841* Jason, Aspen, Gaelan3.0 Spivak Standardization Act v2
> 8842~ Pilgore . . . [1] 2.0 Losing Focus
> 8843* G., Jason, Murphy 4.0 Time B Safe
> 8844~ 4st, Jason 2.0 Fix dreams
> 8845~ secretsnail 1.0 Onicers
> 8846~ secretsnail 1.0 The Cheepening
> 8847~ secretsnail, 4st2.0 Bird Powerup
> 8848~ 4st 1.0 Goals
>
>
>
> [1] Pilgore, nix, Jason, Madrid
>
>
>
> The proposal pool contains the following proposals:
>
> ID Author(s) AITitle
> ---
> Currently empty.
>
>
>
> Legend: * : Democratic proposal.
> ~ : Ordinary proposal.
>
> The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where
> the information shown below differs from the information shown above,
> the information shown above shall control.
>
>
> //
> ID: 8837
> Title: Is this a hard decision?
> Adoption Index: 1.0
> Author: 4st
> Co-author(s):
>
> When this proposal is adopted, each of the following occur in order,
> separately, if possible:
> 1. All players who voted AGAINST or conditionally on this proposal have
> their score set to 0
> 2. All players who voted AGAINST or conditionally on this proposal have
> their coins set to 0
> 3. All players who voted AGAINST or conditionally on this proposal have all
> stamps they own destroyed. 4. All players who voted AGAINST this proposal
> have any stones they own are transferred to Agora.
> 5. All players who voted AGAINST or conditionally on this proposal have any
> birds they own transferred to Agora.
> 6. Grant 4st 200 points.
> 7. Enact the following rule, title 'Voter protection' with power=1.0:
> {
> Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, proposals cannot affect players or
> their assets based on the way they have voted.
> Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, rules that affect players or their
> assets based on the way a player has voted cannot affect the proposal in
> which that rule is enacted.
> }
>
> //
> ID: 8838
> Title: Kickstarter
> Adoption Index: 1.0
> Author: Murphy
> Co-author(s):
>
>
> Each person who was a player when Rule 2668 (Horses) was enacted gains
> 10 dollaries.
>
>
> [Another thing tied to "when the race starts anew", but the enactment of
> these rules doesn't clearly qualify. The Registrar's report of August 14
> should be sufficient to identify who gains dollaries, as there were no
> registrations or deregistrations in between.]
>
>
> //
> ID: 8839
> Title: Not so hard decision
> Adoption Index: 3.0
> Author: 4st
> Co-author(s):
>
>
> Create the following rule if it doesn't exist, with Title "Voter
> Protection" and power=3.0
> {
> Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, proposals cannot affect
> players' assets or players' scores based on the way they have voted.
> Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, rules that affect players' assets or
> players' scores based on the way a player has voted cannot affect the
> proposal in
> which that rule is enacted.
> }
> If a rule with the title "Voter Protection" already exists, amend it so
> that it matches the above rule, and set its power to 3.
>
> //
> ID: 8840
> Title: Cleanliness security
> Adoption Index: 3.0
> Author: Jason
> Co-author(s):
