BUS: (@Assessor) Votes on Proposals 8926-8933
I vote as follows: 8926 ENDORSE snail 8927 ENDORSE G. 8928 ENDORSE G. 8929 ENDORSE snail 8930 ENDORSE ais523 8931 FOR 8932 ENDORSE RLee 8933 ENDORSE snail -- 4st
BUS: Re: OFF: [Mad Engineer] Experiment 00076 - Intent to Invent
I support, approve, withdraw any objections, vand vote FOR to the intent to
invent 00076, as this is an awesome suggestion. 😎
On søn. 12. mar. 2023, 12:02 p.m. Janet Cobb via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> MAD ENGINEER'S WEEKLY REPORT
>
> The Device is off.
>
>
> EXPERIMENT 00076 INTENT TO INVENT
>
> I intend, with Agoran consent, to cause Rule 2655 to amend the Rule "The
> Device" by appending the following a a list item to the "When the device
> is on:" list:
>
> {
>
> If multiple rules attempt to define an device with the same name,
> then they refer to the same device. A rule-defined entity's name
> CANNOT be changed to be the same as another rule-defined device's
> name.
>
> }
BUS: (@Dream Keeper) Stamping
I envision Wealth as my dream. -- snail
BUS: (@Horsened) Horse things
I get a helmet for Baxter by paying a fee of 1 hoof. I bet 3 dollaries on Baxter by paying a fee of 3 dollaries, via alexia. -- snail
BUS: (@Horsened) [Motivation] The horses Gallop!
I motivate the horses: The galloper is Alexia and the random number choice is 1. (Alexia's current pulls are Destructor and Nacho.) -- snail
(@Horsened) Re: BUS: Horse business
On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 03:10 +, ais523 via agora-business wrote: > As my weekly race action, I bet 3 dollaries on Baxter by paying a fee > of 3 dollaries. (Although Baxter's Race Position is 12 or higher, I > have a helmet for Baxter, allowing me to bet on that horse despite > its high Race Position.) As my weekly race action, I bet 3 dollaries on Baxter by paying a fee of 3 dollaries. -- ais523
BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8922-8925
On Sun, Mar 5, 2023 at 5:12 PM secretsnail9 via agora-official < agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > The proposal pool contains the following proposals: > > ID Author(s) AITitle > --- > 8926* 4st, nix3.0 Just add the sins directly > 8927~ 4st, nix1.0 One More Sin > COE: The proposal pool also contains a proposal titled "Acting on commitment" Response: Accepted. Fixed in upcoming report. -- snail
BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8922-8925
I vote as follows (and have updated the spreadsheet): 8922~ G. 1.0 What's a paragraph anyway? FOR 8923~ G. 2.0 Department of Defense FOR (we cannot allow a device gap) 8924~ G., Janet 2.0 A Populist PM FOR 8925* G., Janet, Murphy 3.0 Codify Conditionality FOR
BUS: [proposal] Ritual Ratification
I submit the following proposal:
Title: Ritual ratification
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: Janet
Coauthors:
{
Amend Rule 2680 by replacing "Declared ritual numbers are
self-ratifying." with "A purported attempt to declare the ritual number
is a self-ratifying attestation that such attempt was successful and
that the ritual number was declared."
}
--
Janet Cobb
Assessor, Mad Engineer, Rulekeepor, S​tonemason
BUS: @Arbitor Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 4016 Assigned to nix
On 3/10/23 14:56, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote: The below CFJ is 4016. I assign it to nix. status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#4016 === CFJ 4016 === cuddlybanana has voted FOR on the Agoran decision about whether to adopt proposal 8911. == I judge this CFJ FALSE. Arguments follow. The wording of the vote in question is "I vote FOR on all proposals.", and it was in reply to the thread with distribution of proposals 8914-8920. Cuddlybanana made no other acknowledgments of proposal 8911, even tho e could have voted separately on that distribution. "All" means "all", without other specifiers, so cuddlybanana specified *every* proposal, including many that are not available to vote on. It is doubtful to me that cuddlybanana intended to vote on every proposal that exists, but that's what eir statement seems to say. Additionally, even if I ignore that hitch, I truly cannot decide whether e intended to vote for just that set of proposals in the thread, or everything currently available to em. Both seem equally plausible with a blanket vote. There's historical precedent for players to, occasionally or frequently, vote the same way on every proposal, so it's certainly not unreasonable. But e did quote a specific distribution, so that interpretation is reasonable too. Rule 683 sets out requirements for a ballot, reproduced below with my own emphasis added: An entity submits a ballot on an Agoran decision by publishing a notice satisfying the following conditions: 1. The ballot is submitted during the voting period for the decision. 2. The entity casting the ballot (the voter) was, at the initiation of the decision, a player. **3. The ballot clearly identifies the matter to be decided.** 4. The ballot clearly identifies a valid vote, as determined by the voting method. **5. The ballot clearly sets forth the voter's intent to place the identified vote.** 6. The voter has no other valid ballots on the same decision. Is the matter clearly identified? Doubtful, there's multiple valid interpretations of the scope. Is the intent clear? I think not at all. Thus not only do I think this is not a ballot on 8911, I do not think this is a ballot at all, on any proposal. -- nix Prime Minister, Herald, Collector
BUS: Re: DIS: @Herald Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8914-8920
On 3/12/23 10:18, nix via agora-discussion wrote: On 3/11/23 22:28, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote: ID   Title Result - 8914 Can't Trust Em To Do Eir Own Work ADOPTED 8915 Reenactment V2 REJECTED 8916 Ongoing obligation REJECTED 8917 No ADOPTED 8918 Ritual Paper Dance V2 ADOPTED 8919 Radiance v1.1 ADOPTED 8920 Adopted change re-application ADOPTED For the adoption of P8914 I gain 5 radiance (author). For the adoption of P8918, I gain 1 radiance (co-author). For the adoption of 8919, I gain 5 radiance (author). (Above was to DIS, so for real this time:) For the adoption of P8914 I gain 5 radiance (author). For the adoption of P8918, I gain 1 radiance (co-author). For the adoption of 8919, I gain 5 radiance (author). -- nix Prime Minister, Herald, Collector
BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposal 8921
On 3/11/23 23:01, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote: IDTitleResult -- 8921 ReGardening ADOPTED For the adoption of P8921, I gain 5 radiance (author). -- nix Prime Minister, Herald, Collector
BUS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Full Logical Ruleset - 12 Mar 2023
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 11:02 PM Janet Cobb via agora-official < agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > THE FULL LOGICAL RULESET > ... I declare the ritual number as 1!
