On 7/22/20 12:11 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> 
> On 7/22/2020 8:26 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>> On 7/22/20 2:37 AM, N. S. via agora-business wrote:
>>>> "Honor in scammery" created by R. Lee
>>>
>>> I point my finger at myself for violating this pledge
>> Because breach of this fine is a class 1000 crime, an Indictment will be
>> needed here. G., do you have a preference for how many blots to impose
>> as the aggrieved party?
>>
> 
> I was a full conspirator in the scam underlying this, the ability to
> fulfill the pledge depended on the scam working, and e made a full attempt
> to fulfill the conditions (e published a message that would have kept the
> pledge, during the time we thought the scam had worked).  The fact that e
> didn't a put a "this is void if the scam fails" (which was a common-sense
> understanding between us) isn't injurious at all, from my personal POV.
> 
> Any punishment above a trivial level (I dunno, 1 or 2) would be leveraging
> this pledge to punish em for the scam attempt overall IMO; and nch and I
> were equal partners in the conspiracy.
> 
> -G.
> 

Given that G. is in agreement with a minimal fine, I issue an Indictment
finding R. Lee guilty of breaching eir pledge, "Honor in Scammery",
specifying a fine of 1 blot. I recommend that e be found guilty and the
Indictment imposed only because e clearly breached the pledge and e
should have been more careful in drafting it.

R. Lee, please prepare a defense.

G., please prepare to initiate the decisions. Maybe this time, we'll
finally get to see how the process works.
-- 
----
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, Herald, Referee, Tailor, Pirate
Champion, Badge of the Great Agoran Revival, Badge of the Salted Earth

Reply via email to