Re: BUS: @Arbitor Sillyness [Finger Pointing]

2020-07-24 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
On 7/24/20 8:57 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> On 7/24/20 5:40 AM, N. S. via agora-business wrote:
>> So there's precedent that you can basically take a shortcut to do many
>> actions (a loop of them) as long as it is reasonable that you could perform
>> those actions by writing them out.
>>
>> Therefore, I call N CFJs with the statement "This is a CFJ" where N is the
>> number of CFJs that it would be reasonable for me to fully write out.
>>
> 
> I have my doubts about whether the above worked, but just in case:
> 
> I perform the following actions 100 times:
> 
> {
> 
> I point my finger at R. Lee for initiating an excess case.
> 
> }
> 

In keeping with the Arbitor's finding that no cases were initiated, I
find each of these finger-pointings to be SHENANIGANS.

-- 

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, Herald, Referee, Tailor, Pirate
Champion, Badge of the Great Agoran Revival, Badge of the Salted Earth


Re: BUS: @Arbitor Sillyness

2020-07-24 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-business


On 7/24/2020 2:40 AM, N. S. via agora-business wrote:
> So there's precedent that you can basically take a shortcut to do many
> actions (a loop of them) as long as it is reasonable that you could perform
> those actions by writing them out.
> 
> Therefore, I call N CFJs with the statement "This is a CFJ" where N is the
> number of CFJs that it would be reasonable for me to fully write out.
> 

I do not consider this a clear specification of an announcement  for the
starting of any cfjs.



Re: BUS: @Arbitor Sillyness [Finger Pointing]

2020-07-24 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-business
On 7/24/20 5:40 AM, N. S. via agora-business wrote:
> So there's precedent that you can basically take a shortcut to do many
> actions (a loop of them) as long as it is reasonable that you could perform
> those actions by writing them out.
>
> Therefore, I call N CFJs with the statement "This is a CFJ" where N is the
> number of CFJs that it would be reasonable for me to fully write out.
>

I have my doubts about whether the above worked, but just in case:

I perform the following actions 100 times:

{

I point my finger at R. Lee for initiating an excess case.

}

-- 
Jason Cobb



BUS: @Arbitor Sillyness

2020-07-24 Thread N. S. via agora-business
So there's precedent that you can basically take a shortcut to do many
actions (a loop of them) as long as it is reasonable that you could perform
those actions by writing them out.

Therefore, I call N CFJs with the statement "This is a CFJ" where N is the
number of CFJs that it would be reasonable for me to fully write out.

-- 
>From R. Lee