BUS: Re: DIS: "Corn" vs "coin"
Notice of Honour: +1 to twg for finding this lovely bug. -1 from Kenyon, we may have seen this sooner if the Ruleset had been updated. On Fri, 1 Jun 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > Since we're talking about proposals that aren't in the SLR yet, I noticed > this in the Consolidated Patch (proposal 8041): > > > Amend Rule 2003, Actions in Arcadia, by changing the text "substitute 3 > > apples for 1 corn" to read "substitute 1 coin for three or fewer apples" > > Was the change from "corn" to "coin" intentional or a typo? And if it was > intentional - what was the purpose? As far as I can see, it makes corn > useless. > > -twg >
Re: BUS: Re: DIS: "Corn" vs "coin"
Lol. No worries, at least now I know I didn't make a mistake since you did exactly the same thing. I retract the proposal "Reconsolidating Metapatch". -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On June 1, 2018 10:38 AM, Ned Strange wrote: > goddamnit this is why I have to start reading emails top-down. > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > >> Well, you were named as a co-author! :P >> >> That's good. I thought it was probably a mistake, but I wanted to make sure. >> >> I create the following proposal: >> >> -- >> Title: Reconsolidating Metapatch >> Adoption index: 1.0 >> Author: twg >> >> Amend Rule 2003, Actions in Arcadia, by changing the text "substitute >> 1 coin for three or fewer apples" to read "substitute 1 corn for >> three or fewer apples". >> >> -- >> >> [I would pend it but (a) I don't have much paper yet, and (b) as this is my >> first proposal, I'm not sure I did everything correctly and would like >> someone to check it.] >> >> -twg >> >> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ >> >> On June 1, 2018 8:34 AM, Reuben Staley wrote: >> >>> That's definitely a mistake and breaks several things. Well, at least I can >>> say that it wasn't me this time lol. >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 02:24 Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: >>> >>> > Since we're talking about proposals that aren't in the SLR yet, I noticed >>> > this in the Consolidated Patch (proposal 8041): >>> > >>> > > Amend Rule 2003, Actions in Arcadia, by changing the text "substitute 3 >>> > >>> > > apples for 1 corn" to read "substitute 1 coin for three or fewer apples" >>> > >>> > Was the change from "corn" to "coin" intentional or a typo? And if it was >>> > intentional - what was the purpose? As far as I can see, it makes corn >>> > useless. >>> > >>> > -twg > > -- > From V.J. Rada
BUS: Re: DIS: "Corn" vs "coin"
I hate this game and create and pend the following proposal with paper. Title: Let's not make game assets one letter different from each other AI: 3 Text: Amend rule 2003 by replacing "substitute 1 coin for three or fewer apples" with "substitute 1 corn for 3 or fewer apples". On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 6:34 PM, Reuben Staley wrote: > That's definitely a mistake and breaks several things. Well, at least I can > say that it wasn't me this time lol. > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 02:24 Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > > Since we're talking about proposals that aren't in the SLR yet, I noticed > > this in the Consolidated Patch (proposal 8041): > > > > > Amend Rule 2003, Actions in Arcadia, by changing the text "substitute 3 > > > apples for 1 corn" to read "substitute 1 coin for three or fewer > apples" > > > > Was the change from "corn" to "coin" intentional or a typo? And if it was > > intentional - what was the purpose? As far as I can see, it makes corn > > useless. > > > > -twg > > > -- >From V.J. Rada
BUS: Re: DIS: "Corn" vs "coin"
Well, you were named as a co-author! :P That's good. I thought it was probably a mistake, but I wanted to make sure. I create the following proposal: -- Title: Reconsolidating Metapatch Adoption index: 1.0 Author: twg Amend Rule 2003, Actions in Arcadia, by changing the text "substitute 1 coin for three or fewer apples" to read "substitute 1 corn for three or fewer apples". -- [I would pend it but (a) I don't have much paper yet, and (b) as this is my first proposal, I'm not sure I did everything correctly and would like someone to check it.] -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On June 1, 2018 8:34 AM, Reuben Staley wrote: > That's definitely a mistake and breaks several things. Well, at least I can > say that it wasn't me this time lol. > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 02:24 Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > > Since we're talking about proposals that aren't in the SLR yet, I noticed > > this in the Consolidated Patch (proposal 8041): > > > > > Amend Rule 2003, Actions in Arcadia, by changing the text "substitute 3 > > > > > apples for 1 corn" to read "substitute 1 coin for three or fewer apples" > > > > Was the change from "corn" to "coin" intentional or a typo? And if it was > > intentional - what was the purpose? As far as I can see, it makes corn > > useless. > > > > -twg
