On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 21:15 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to ratify the following document. (Note:
> this document is invalid because it describes a sequence of events that
> never actually happened, and the reason for ratifying it is to close a
> potential dictatorship.)
By "invalid", I meant "inaccurate". If for some reason (e.g. disclaimer
precedents) that invalidates the actions in the message, I repeat them,
but with "invalid" corrected to "inaccurate".
> {{{{
> There exists a pending proposal with ID number "7868b", title "Scam
> Fix", AI 3, and the following text:
> {{{
> In rule 1728, change all occurrences of "With N Objections" to "Without
> N Objections".
>
> Cause nichdel to become the Assessor.
> }}}
>
> ais523 is the Assessor.
>
> There is an Agoran Decision on whether to adopt that proposal whose AI
> is 3, whose voting period has ended, whose vote collector is the
> Assessor, and whose quorum is 1. ais523 cast a valid ballot voting FOR
> it; no other players voted on it.
> }}}}
>
> Without objection, I do so.
>
> I hereby resolve the Agoran Decision on whether to adopt proposal
> 7868b. The valid ballots were as follows:
>
> ais523: FOR
>
> There was a total of 1 valid ballot, with 1 ballot cast FOR and 0
> ballots cast AGAINST. The outcome was ADOPTED.
>
> The text of the adopted proposal was:
> {{{
> In rule 1728, change all occurrences of "With N Objections" to "Without
> N Objections".
>
> Cause nichdel to become the Assessor.
> }}}
--
ais523
