DIS: Re: BUS: Stepping Down
comex wrote: On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: Proposal: Amethyst Card Repeal (AI=2, II=2) If it's II-2 can I be co-author? I'd say yes, but it repeals coauthor rewards, making it pointless, and I don't have another distrib-u-matic. -coppro
DIS: Re: BUS: Why not?
2009/11/14 ais523 : > On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 13:29 -0700, Sean Hunt wrote: >> I play six Your Turn cards, specifying the following players: >> Murphy >> ais523 >> ehird >> BobTHJ >> Pavitra >> c. > > I play Distrib-U-Matic to make "This gets on my nerves" distributable. > (This counts as destroying a Distrib-U-Matic for the purposes of Your > Turn, right?) > > -- > ais523 > > It would count, but it fails due to coppro doing that right before. -- -Tiger
DIS: Re: BUS: [Anarchist] Repeal Proposal
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I play Distrib-u-Matics to make the following proposals Distributable:
> Ratification of disclaimered documents
> This gets on my nerves
> Self-Ratifying Census
> Free Parking
> Stoma Moats of Atoms
> Remove Stupid Report
>
> I submit the following proposals as part of my Anarchist duties:
>
> Proposal: Drop them, really. (AI=1, II=0)
> {{{
> [This removes bits of foreign relations we don't really need. Protectorates
> remain as a form of declaration that Agora is superior to other nomics. The
> Speaker also remains as e's the Speaker.]
> Repeal Rule 2200 (Nomic Definitions).
> Repeal Rule 2135 (Advertising).
> Repeal Rule 2185 (Foreign Relations).
> Repeal Rule 2251 (InterNomic Attitude).
> }}}
Advertising should probably stay (at least the part about the
NomicWiki updating). The other rules I'm fine with repealing, though.
DIS: Re: BUS: Bleh
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > I deregister ə. > > -coppro > Can you do that?
DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Deprioritize History
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Aaron Goldfein > wrote: >> Proposal: Deprioritize History (AI = 1, II = 1) > > I pledge to attempt to become Registrar as soon as possible after the > next time I register. > Again, the proposal doesn't eliminate the history, it only moves it from monthly to weekly. It's not pertinent and it really isn't changing that much.
DIS: Re: BUS: Why not?
ais523 wrote: On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 13:29 -0700, Sean Hunt wrote: I play six Your Turn cards, specifying the following players: Murphy ais523 ehird BobTHJ Pavitra c. I play Distrib-U-Matic to make "This gets on my nerves" distributable. (This counts as destroying a Distrib-U-Matic for the purposes of Your Turn, right?) Yes. -coppro
DIS: I am bored.
So now my NEW NAME is Ienpw III. - yuri_dragon_17
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Report NoVs.
Ed Murphy wrote: c. wrote: I close this NoV. I play Absolv-o-Matic indicating myself as many times as I have rests. I'm interpreting this as "(I play Absolv-o-Matic indicating myself) as many times..." rather than "I play Absolv-o-Matic indicating (myself as many times..." as only a moron in a hurry would think the latter was intended. As did I. -coppro
DIS: Re: BUS: Report NoVs.
c. wrote: > I close this NoV. I play Absolv-o-Matic indicating myself as many > times as I have rests. I'm interpreting this as "(I play Absolv-o-Matic indicating myself) as many times..." rather than "I play Absolv-o-Matic indicating (myself as many times..." as only a moron in a hurry would think the latter was intended.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2731 assigned to c.
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Wrong procedure. This punishes the judge for your own mistake[...] My judicial rank would only decrease if the panel judged OVERRULE. No opinion on the week delay... -- -c.
Re: BUS: Re: DIS: let's shrink the ruleset...
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: 2009/11/9 Elliott Hird : 2009/11/9 Kerim Aydin : Hey c., If you don't propose and distribute those citrine repeals, I'll do it... let's get this ruleset shrunk (or at least propose it)! -G. i guess nobody is in a hurry to distribute *my* mass-repeal proposal huh :D If I have any, I spend a Distrib-u-matic to make Stoma Moats of Atoms distributable. You do not, so this fails. -coppro
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2731 assigned to c.
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > 2009/11/14 comex : >> UNDETERMINED per CFJ 1769. >> > Sorry, didn't think of this. It was all clear to me... I intend to > appeal this sentence with 2 support. I also submit the following as > evidence: Wrong procedure. This punishes the judge for your own mistake (and delays the process, as the result would probably be REMAND which just adds a week). The right thing to do is re-call the case immediately with a new CFJ; c.'s decision didn't set any kind of precedent on the new facts and was correct, so deserves to be affirmed. -G.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: coppro's Random Change Deals.
Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
H. CotC, H. Registrar, and H. Assessor, you each need to publish a list
of draws earned last week (in the case of the Registrar and Assessor, I
believe this is an empty list, but it nonetheless needs to be posted).
Which rule requires this? For now, here's the output of
cotc/salaries.php (with spaces removed to make it fit here):
R2278 and R2262... I just discovered that due to typo, R2261 makes me
responsible for tracking draws due to proposals *grumble*.
Proposal: Officer Fix (AI=2, II=0)
{{{
Amend Rule 2261 by replacing "IADoP" with "Assessor".
}}}
The following players earned Change Draws last week:
coppro - 4
Murphy - 1
(note: I'm withholding the CFJ about earning 1.7 draws because draws are
clearly not divisible)
-coppro
