DIS: Re: OFF: [ATC] Flight Schedule
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: [An upcoming fix proposal will attempt to ratify this report.] I wonder if that counts as a disclaimer or not. Probably not...
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ATC] Flight Schedule
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 11:25 -0400, comex wrote: On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: [An upcoming fix proposal will attempt to ratify this report.] I wonder if that counts as a disclaimer or not. Probably not... Also, I wonder if it's part of the report. If so, the fix proposal in question will ratify the fact that it attempted to ratify the report in question, which is some weird recursion. -- ais523
DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: In before Kelly
On 3/23/10 8:22 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: Proposal: In before Kelly (AI = 1, II = 0, please) Amend Rule 2287 (Props) by replacing this text: Once per week, each player CAN transfer a prop from one player to another, with this text: Once per week, each player CAN transfer a prop from one player to another by announcement, [Rule 2166 only provides this mechanism when the player transfers one of eir own props.] Ratify the alleged Air Traffic Controller Report that Murphy published within the past hour, containing the text An upcoming fix proposal will attempt to ratify this report. Rule 1551/13 (Power=3) Ratification [...] Ratifying a public document is secured. - woggle signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
