DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Effect cleanup

2010-05-26 Thread ais523 
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 19:18 -0400, comex wrote:
 Proposal: Effect cleanup (AI=3, Distributable via fee)
 
 Amend Rule 106 by removing:
 
This rule takes
   precedence over any rule which would permit a proposal to take
   effect.
 
 and:
 
  It does not
   otherwise take effect.
 
 and by adding the following paragraph before the last paragraph:
 
   A proposal with a decision on which the option selected by Agora
   is not ADOPTED does not take effect, rules to the contrary
   notwithstanding.
 
 [Clarify what it is, and deseparate those clauses.]

So proposals can take effect before people start voting on them, if a
low-power rule says they can? You should require the presence of an
ADOPTED decision, not just veto the presence of a non-ADOPTED decision.

-- 
ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Effect cleanup

2010-05-26 Thread Geoffrey Spear 
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:46 AM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 So proposals can take effect before people start voting on them, if a
 low-power rule says they can? You should require the presence of an
 ADOPTED decision, not just veto the presence of a non-ADOPTED decision.

But how would e scam that?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Effect cleanup

2010-05-26 Thread comex 
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:46 AM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 So proposals can take effect before people start voting on them, if a
 low-power rule says they can?

That would violate Power Controls Mutability.