DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6751-6762
>> 6755 P 1 2.0 Yally One-to-one Cancellation > AGAINST Nobody has EVER used this feature. It needs a little buff.
DIS: Re: BUS: Journey
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 14:14 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:13, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:00 PM, comex wrote: > >> I CFJ on the statement: "comex has a Leadership Token." > > > > I disfavor this case. > > Me too. Also, comex, no. Don't do it. The whole Space Alert ruleset is > riddled with these kind of errors. We all implicitly understand how it > works, but I'm sure there are at least a dozen technical errors that > will cause all kinds of things to break, scams to be created, and so > on. Actual gameplay as gameplay seems more suited to a place like BlogNomic. In Agora, such rules generally seem to exist only to be scammed; at least, people are likely to treat them that way even if they're meant to be pure gameplay. But if it's just a normal game with no interaction with everything else, why put it here in Agora rather than as a standalone game, especially as many people might not be interested in it? -- ais523
DIS: Re: BUS: Journey
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:13, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:00 PM, comex wrote: >>> I CFJ on the statement: "comex has a Leadership Token." >> >> I disfavor this case. > > Me too. Also, comex, no. Don't do it. The whole Space Alert ruleset is > riddled with these kind of errors. We all implicitly understand how it > works, but I'm sure there are at least a dozen technical errors that > will cause all kinds of things to break, scams to be created, and so > on. I'm interested in playing this game "fairly", but there are lots of things that I can't even decide whether are scams. For example, make a large map and the ship will run out of energy, then be useless at the end; is that intended?
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Journey
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, ais523 wrote: > On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 14:14 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:13, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:00 PM, comex wrote: > > >> I CFJ on the statement: "comex has a Leadership Token." > > > > > > I disfavor this case. > > > > Me too. Also, comex, no. Don't do it. The whole Space Alert ruleset is > > riddled with these kind of errors. We all implicitly understand how it > > works, but I'm sure there are at least a dozen technical errors that > > will cause all kinds of things to break, scams to be created, and so > > on. > > Actual gameplay as gameplay seems more suited to a place like BlogNomic. > In Agora, such rules generally seem to exist only to be scammed; at > least, people are likely to treat them that way even if they're meant to > be pure gameplay. But if it's just a normal game with no interaction > with everything else, why put it here in Agora rather than as a > standalone game, especially as many people might not be interested in > it? We keep getting rid of contests, but we keep wanting them: proto: bring back simple contest framework not tied to heavy contract baggage." -G.
