Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Second try on the long-term ambassador proposal

2011-08-18 Thread omd
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
 Honestly a lot of this/almost all of this is up to the other Nomic.

Not necessarily.  In Tiger's BlogNomic post:

 I now wish to leave the game, but use this account to re-enter
 the game with my current screen name, Agora Nomic. As I am the
 ambassador of Agora, I will be playing on its behalf.

playing on Agora's behalf is worded as a sort of attribute attached
to Tiger joining the game.  Since it's vague what that means, it was
reasonable for BlogNomic to ignore it and consider Tiger to have
joined the game for emself.  In fact, I think we might have treated it
the same way if Tiger had used this wording to join Agora on behalf of
BlogNomic.

But we could clearly specify the type of representation we want
(assuming that we want to be recognized the same way we would
recognize other nomics):

Tiger is posting this message on Agora's behalf in the same sense
that his web browser is posting it on his behalf.  He is not
attempting to perform any actions himself, but to act as a mechanical
agent for Agora in the ways permitted by its ruleset.

I, Agora Nomic, request to join the game.

There is a good chance the other nomic will consider this ineffective,
if only because they don't implicitly recognize legal persons as
persons, but *if* it is accepted, it can only be Agora the abstract
entity registering, not any kind of representative.  So, Tiger could
register on his own behalf and play separately; it doesn't matter who
the Ambassador is or if there is none, as long as messages required to
be sent by Agora are sent by some rule-defined process; etc.
(Penalties might still be an interesting issue, although I think Agora
only cares what is binding in its own jurisdiction, not what effect
sending messages might have in someone else's platonic world.)


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Second try on the long-term ambassador proposal

2011-08-18 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
 It really wouldn't make any difference what rule we pass here, it
 would be all up to their ruleset/interpretations of their own records.

Except, of course, from Agora's point of view, where the CAN in the
proposal would create a cascading legal fiction about Blognomic's
gamestate.


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Second try on the long-term ambassador proposal

2011-08-18 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
On 18 August 2011 08:16, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
 Honestly a lot of this/almost all of this is up to the other Nomic.

 Not necessarily.  In Tiger's BlogNomic post:

 I now wish to leave the game, but use this account to re-enter
 the game with my current screen name, Agora Nomic. As I am the
 ambassador of Agora, I will be playing on its behalf.

For the record, the biggest reason for doing this by way of
deregistering-reregistering rather than just stating that now I'm
playing on Agora's behalf was because it was the easiest way I found
of changing my screen name legally.

- Tiger


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Second try on the long-term ambassador proposal

2011-08-18 Thread Kerim Aydin


On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
 On 18 August 2011 08:16, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu 
  wrote:
  Honestly a lot of this/almost all of this is up to the other Nomic.
 
  Not necessarily.  In Tiger's BlogNomic post:
 
  I now wish to leave the game, but use this account to re-enter
  the game with my current screen name, Agora Nomic. As I am the
  ambassador of Agora, I will be playing on its behalf.
 
 For the record, the biggest reason for doing this by way of
 deregistering-reregistering rather than just stating that now I'm
 playing on Agora's behalf was because it was the easiest way I found
 of changing my screen name legally.

I'm not sure omd and I are actually disagreeing (versus obliquely saying
the same thing).  This last point is interesting; it's still up to the
other nomic whether to treat this two records Agora via representative
who hasn't re-registered and Tiger who just registered or treat it
as one-and-the-same as they were both you.

Whether they come and look at our game to see if you had an official
mandate in judging between these options is again up to them.

-G.






Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Second try on the long-term ambassador proposal

2011-08-18 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 12:24 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
 I'm not sure omd and I are actually disagreeing (versus obliquely saying
 the same thing).  This last point is interesting; it's still up to the
 other nomic whether to treat this two records Agora via representative
 who hasn't re-registered and Tiger who just registered or treat it
 as one-and-the-same as they were both you.
 
 Whether they come and look at our game to see if you had an official
 mandate in judging between these options is again up to them.

At least some BlogNomic players have definitely been looking at the a-d
archives (and presumably the a-b archives too).

-- 
ais523



DIS: Re: BAK: Re: BUS: blarghfrom Sabrina

2011-08-18 Thread Sgeo
 To the best of my knowledge, I did not send the above-quoted message and
 Sabrina Friedman is not the Horton. The preceding sentence is explicitly
 intended as doubt for the purposes of preventing self-ratification.

 Pavitra


You sent the message that Sabrina sent on July 12 (iirc, I was
checking just a second ago, not 100% certain I remember the month from
a second ago, wow)

A while ago, Reddit was bubbling over with spambots that would just
repeat a previously stated comment. I guess a similar thing is hitting
mailing lists now?


Re: DIS: Re: BAK: Re: BUS: blarghfrom Sabrina

2011-08-18 Thread Pavitra
On 08/18/2011 07:23 PM, Sgeo wrote:
 To the best of my knowledge, I did not send the above-quoted message and
 Sabrina Friedman is not the Horton. The preceding sentence is explicitly
 intended as doubt for the purposes of preventing self-ratification.

 Pavitra

 
 You sent the message that Sabrina sent on July 12 (iirc, I was
 checking just a second ago, not 100% certain I remember the month from
 a second ago, wow)

I sent the message that Sabrina resent, but I did not send Sabrina's
resendage metamessage.


DIS: Presented without comment

2011-08-18 Thread Ed Murphy
http://www.hitadude.com/