DIS: Re: BUS: Fwd: OFF: [IADoP] Promotor Election
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:27 AM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Oh, and I vote for scshunt in the Promotor election. So do I. -- Noé Rubinstein.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: We have a new office
omd wrote: On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: Counterarguments: Those actions are intended to be disallowed for non-players. Arguments: I intend these actions to be disallowed for ais523. Counterarguments: More specifically, those actions are generally and (usually) uncontroversially intended to be disallowed for non-players.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: We have a new office
omd wrote: On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: Second, in general, attempting to perform an Agoran action by announcement is not explicitly prohibited or regulated, thus by R101(i) persons have the right to so attempt. Specific forms are ILLEGAL (e.g. Endorsing Forgery), but then R101(vi) applies. It's regulated because the Ambassador rule makes it ILLEGAL. Relevant clause: It is ILLEGAL to use or attempt to use such powers or privileges except as allowed by the rules of Agora. I was going to cite R2125 (c) through (e) as a counterargument, but on second thought, I think (e) in particular supports your side. I stand by my other counterarguments, though (R101, R1504, opt-in/out use).
DIS: Re: BUS: Fwd: OFF: [IADoP] Promotor Election
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: On 10 July 2012 14:26, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: Ｉ ｖｏｔｅ ｆｏｒ ｓｃｓｈｕｎｔ． Fine, I'll do it. CFJ: I have cast a vote in the current Promotor election. Arguments: I've honestly forgotten our precedent on this. How the hell would this not be trivially TRUE by rule 754/1? -- Noé Rubinstein.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fwd: OFF: [IADoP] Promotor Election
On 11 July 2012 01:19, Noé Rubinstein noe.rubinst...@gmail.com wrote: How the hell would this not be trivially TRUE by rule 754/1? Those are full-width characters; they are certainly not the usual means we would expect actions to be presented in, but more importantly, several players may be unable to view the text correctly, due to lack of font support.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fwd: OFF: [IADoP] Promotor Election
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: On 11 July 2012 01:19, Noé Rubinstein noe.rubinst...@gmail.com wrote: How the hell would this not be trivially TRUE by rule 754/1? Those are full-width characters; they are certainly not the usual means we would expect actions to be presented in, but more importantly, several players may be unable to view the text correctly, due to lack of font support. didn't we just have a CFJ about this? :p
