Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Reminder
So why is it bad that I voted on them? -Henri
Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Reminder
On May 26, 2014 2:03 PM, Henri Bouchard henrib...@gmail.com wrote: So why is it bad that I voted on them? -Henri It's not. That's why I didn't issue a humiliating public reminder for you. -scshunt
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Reminder
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Sun, 25 May 2014, Sean Hunt wrote: G.'S NOBLE ATTEMPT TO VOTE WAS OFFSET BY HIS INABILITY TO READ MY MANY REDISTRIBUTIONS I hereby vote on the referenced proposals in a conditional manner, with the condition being, if the Assessor can reasonably determine what I meant to vote on and what option, I vote in that manner. Curse you for voting in a manner that will force me to implement conditional votes properly in my scripts. -scshunt
DIS: make a judge writ trade
On Mon, 26 May 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote: If elected, I promise to select judges following the rules guidelines using transparent common sense; e.g. with public random number generators and an opt-in / opt-out method, and will assume the risks upon myself if this is not legal. Actually, if Elected, I promise, if expressions of interest are made, to create a sort of game like this, which I informally would agree to abide by: 1. Writs are a currency limited to players (reference to a specific past currency rule, as currencies are repealed). 2. There's a Writ Pool. When started, there are N writs in the pool, where N is the number of players. 3. A player CAN take a writ from the writ pool if e has not done so in the past (month/30 days). (opt-in; everyone can grab one in plenty of time then get extas a month later). 4. When a new player arrives, I SHALL offer em a Writ in a timely manner. If e accepts, I'll create one and give it to em; otherwise I'll create one in the pool. 5. Whenever there's a CFJ to be assigned, it's assigned to players with probability proportional to the number of writs they have. 6. I can generally fiddle with writs to match the spirit of this contest.
Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3406 assigned to Fool
On Mon, 26 May 2014, omd wrote: I support, because I said I would. If re-elected, I promise to continue to follow the guideline of the third paragraph of Rule 991, and in particular to never use a random number generator or any clearly specified procedure for selecting judges. (However, please note that I neither said I would follow the unproductive approach mentioned in the above quote nor did so, merely speculated it was the only legal one. Since the ruleset currently envisions selective enforcement of itself, and my interpretation arguably contradicts certain past precedents, this may not be the end of the world.) I thank my Honorable Opponent for eir fairly-given support. Let me say that I intend to run a positive campaign; in particular, I shall not fearmongor nor claim that my opponent's system is illegal, arbitrary, or otherwise the End of the World. Rather I freely accept eir method as one of many reasonable possibilities, and simply suggest that my own stated intentions are bit more Interesting, Satisfying, and/or Fun.
