Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3828 Assigned to Alexis
I think everyone has a level of self-interest because everyone (except the author of the proposal) could get a coin. Therefore, I think this CFJ should be assigned to the author of the proposal under the "clean up your own mess" principle. On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 5:48 AM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 at 15:36, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion < > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > Did you have some level of self-interest that I missed? (no worries > about > > the reason, just asking because it might apply to other potential judges, > > if there's an interaction I'm missing here). > > > > Not seriously, I don't think. > -- >From R. Lee
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3828 Assigned to Alexis
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 at 15:36, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > Did you have some level of self-interest that I missed? (no worries about > the reason, just asking because it might apply to other potential judges, > if there's an interaction I'm missing here). > Not seriously, I don't think.
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3828 Assigned to Alexis
On 4/18/2020 11:16 AM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote: > On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 at 12:08, Kerim Aydin via agora-official < > agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > >> The below CFJ is 3828. I assign it to Alexis. >> >> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3828 >> >> === CFJ 3828 === >> >> A recent rule named "A coin award" was enacted, increased the >> number of coins R. Lee owns by 1, and then repealed itself. >> >> == >> > > I recuse myself from this case. > > (Sorry, but I don't think it's appropriate for me to judge this one.) > Did you have some level of self-interest that I missed? (no worries about the reason, just asking because it might apply to other potential judges, if there's an interaction I'm missing here).
Re: DIS: Message didn't go through
On 4/18/20 1:29 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote: > hrmmm, I can't get in, how do I access that? You need to have your mailing list password. If you don't know it, go to [0] and follow the instructions for a password reminder. [0]: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/ -- Jason Cobb
Re: DIS: Message didn't go through
hrmmm, I can't get in, how do I access that? On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 4:10 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 4/18/20 7:43 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote: > > I sent a meme of Peter Suber in response to a message that said that a > rule > > was amending itself or something like that, but it doesn't appear in the > > archives. > > > You mean this message? > > https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2020-April/057290.html > > -- > Jason Cobb > >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Prime Minister] Awards Month
On 4/11/2020 3:04 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote: > I CFJ, barring P.S.S., 'The above attempts to impose fines by the Cold > Hand of Justice on twg and Murphy for failure to timely respond to a > petition failed by Rule 2531(3), because each was an attempt "to levy > a fine with a value that is blatantly and obviously unsuited to the > conduct which constitutes the reason for its levy", after considering > the sentencing guidelines in Rule 2557, or, in the alternative, failed > because each was not enabled by Rule 2557.' > > (Sorry for the length of the CFJ statement; it's an experiment in > writing a relatively self-contained one. I welcome comments on whether > or not that's a good idea.) I'm not keen on this approach (I thought about it a bit), in looking at the "longer" statements in the CFJ index I think it decreases browsability and I don't think it particularly aids findability, and if it became a habit would take a re-think of how to design the index page. I could be wrong though, and serves as a reminder that I still haven't implemented search! [The amusing bit is that, for all its specificity, it jumbles the actual evidence, because "The above" doesn't have a referent when put in the case logs. It's always a (very minor) bother when callers use message-positional references in a statement because that usually changes in the case log and requires some annotation].
Re: DIS: Message didn't go through
On 4/18/20 7:43 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote: > I sent a meme of Peter Suber in response to a message that said that a rule > was amending itself or something like that, but it doesn't appear in the > archives. You mean this message? https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2020-April/057290.html -- Jason Cobb
DIS: Message didn't go through
I sent a meme of Peter Suber in response to a message that said that a rule was amending itself or something like that, but it doesn't appear in the archives.
