Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Matters of Honor
On 10/4/20 6:35 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote: > On Sun, 2020-10-04 at 18:25 -0400, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via > agora-business wrote: >> On 10/4/20 5:56 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: >>> On 10/4/20 6:35 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora- >>> official wrote: >>> >>> CoE: not all values of the Karma switch have their default values. >> >> I respond to this CoE by referencing Jason's most recently called >> CFJ. > > Can you do that? The CFJ isn't about whether the report is accurate, > it's about whether the report is a report. (It was definitely > inaccurate.) > Well, the report wouldn't purport the values of the switches if it was not a report. -- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, Herald, Referee, Tailor, Pirate Champion, Badge of the Great Agoran Revival, Badge of the Salted Earth
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Matters of Honor
On Sun, 2020-10-04 at 18:25 -0400, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business wrote: > On 10/4/20 5:56 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: > > On 10/4/20 6:35 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora- > > official wrote: > > > > CoE: not all values of the Karma switch have their default values. > > I respond to this CoE by referencing Jason's most recently called > CFJ. Can you do that? The CFJ isn't about whether the report is accurate, it's about whether the report is a report. (It was definitely inaccurate.) -- ais523
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Matters of Honor
On 10/4/20 11:51 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: > Did you mean to send an empty email for this report? > Nope, thanks for letting me know -- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, Herald, Referee, Tailor, Pirate Champion, Badge of the Great Agoran Revival, Badge of the Salted Earth
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3884 Assigned to Aris
On 10/3/2020 12:55 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote: > Thus, I arrive at the following standard. For something to be a forum, a > sufficiently large number of people^ must be actually and reasonably able to > communicate via it. The notion of "forum" in this context, to me implies "public and open" (in the common definition of "public", not the Agoran definition sense). Rather than depend on number of people, I think it would be better to depend on whether it's generally open to relevant people to exchange ideas (i.e. can the typical Agoran subscribe to it with reasonable effort). For example, if I have a private email list for a scam, and the scam involves 5+ people, and we don't let anyone outside of the scam join, that's not really a forum. -G.
DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] Matters of Honor
Did you mean to send an empty email for this report? -- Jason Cobb
