Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] VP Win clarification
On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 22:43 -0300, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> secretsnail9 via agora-business [2022-05-02 19:03]:
> > I submit the following proposal, and pend it by paying a fee of 1 pendant.
> > {
> > Amend Rule 2621 (VP Wins) by replacing "If a player has at least 20 more
> > Winsomes than any other player" with "If a player has at least 20 more
> > Winsomes than all other players".
> > }
> Honestly, that doesn't clarify it for me, but makes it more confusing.
> It makes me wonder if I should sum-up the other players' Winsomes. That
> use of “any” is pretty standard, but if you wish for something else,
> perhaps “has the most Winsomes by a margin of at least 20”, or “has at
> least 20 more Winsomes than the second player with the most Winsomes”.
I think the usual unambiguous way to write this is "If a player has at
least 20 more Winsomes than each other player".
--
ais523
DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] VP Win clarification
secretsnail9 via agora-business [2022-05-02 19:03]:
> I submit the following proposal, and pend it by paying a fee of 1 pendant.
>
> {
>
> Title: Let's make it clear
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: secretsnail
> Co-author(s):
>
>
> Amend Rule 2621 (VP Wins) by replacing "If a player has at least 20 more
> Winsomes than any other player" with "If a player has at least 20 more
> Winsomes than all other players".
>
> }
Honestly, that doesn't clarify it for me, but makes it more confusing.
It makes me wonder if I should sum-up the other players' Winsomes. That
use of “any” is pretty standard, but if you wish for something else,
perhaps “has the most Winsomes by a margin of at least 20”, or “has at
least 20 more Winsomes than the second player with the most Winsomes”.
--
juan
Re: DIS: Subject style guide
On 5/2/22 12:06, juan via agora-discussion wrote: Hi Agorans, I still have some trouble figuring out which officers should be mentioned in which messages. I suggest the website to include an Agoran cheatsheet with, among others, that information (e.g., “When transfering assets: @Treasuror”, etc). Is that something of interest? Would it be much work? Take a look at the LOAFers contract in the notary report. It has a pretty good list of suggestions. I'm not against this being online somewhere, but it becomes one more thing that has to be kept updated by somebody. Signalling officers is also not a thing that's always been a style preference, it's more recent. In earlier times officers were expected to track things down, usually by keyword. -- nix Herald, Collector
DIS: Subject style guide
Hi Agorans, I still have some trouble figuring out which officers should be mentioned in which messages. I suggest the website to include an Agoran cheatsheet with, among others, that information (e.g., “When transfering assets: @Treasuror”, etc). Is that something of interest? Would it be much work? -- juan
