DIS: Re: BUS: (@Herald, @Stonemason) Hello stone(s)?

2023-01-15 Thread secretsnail9 via agora-discussion
I have the dream of gardens, which allows me to "by announcement,
transfer the mossiest stone (if there is a tie, then a specified
stone tied for mossiest) Agora owns to emself."

--
snail


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] Slightly less self-interested proposal

2023-01-15 Thread Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
On 1/15/23 15:47, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> Janet wrote:
>
>> [Currently, I'm effectively locked out of owning any actually useful
>> stone without setting a Dream, which isn't really fair. If I attempt to
> Is this actually true? I thought that had something to do with auctions,
> which were repealed about a month ago, and any rule or regulation
> actually putting the Stonemason on different footing may have been
> repealed earlier than that (I spot-checked about four months back but
> didn't spot anything relevant).


The Mason's stone both does nothing and will generally be owned by me,
and thus count towards the 30-day lockout for getting actually useful
stones.

-- 
Janet Cobb

Assessor, Mad Engineer, Rulekeepor, S​tonemason



DIS: Re: OFF: [Mad Engineer] Experiment 00069 - Rule Selection

2023-01-15 Thread Edward Murphy via agora-discussion

Janet wrote:


EXPERIMENT 00069 RULE SELECTION

As selected on Discord #botspam, the rule for this week is Rule 2641
("Wielding Stones"). I affirm under penalty of No Faking that, to the
best of my knowledge, the process used in this selection had the correct
distribution.

Please send suggestions if you have them!

The text of Rule 2641 is reproduced below for convenience:


Rule 2641/2 (Power=2)
Wielding Stones

   Except as otherwise specified by the rules, the owner of a stone
   CAN wield it by announcement specifying any values needed to
   interpret the stone's effects.
   
   A stone with a frequency that has been wielded in the corresponding

   Agoran time interval is Hot for the remainder of the time period
   (e.g. if the frequency is daily, it is hot for the remainder of the
   Agoran day it was wielded during).
   
   While a stone is hot, it is IMPOSSIBLE to wield it or to transfer

   it by announcement
   
   When a stone is wielded, the Rule defining that stone applies any

   effects that it defines as occurring when the stone is wielded.
   
   The wielding of stones is secured.


Except as otherwise specified by the rules, the owner of a device
CAN wield it by announcement specifying any values needed to
interpret the device's effects.

When a device is wielded, the Rule defining that device applies any
effects that it defines as occurring when the device is wielded.


DIS: Re: OFF: [Mad Engineer] Experiment 00068 - Rule Selection

2023-01-15 Thread Edward Murphy via agora-discussion

Janet wrote:


EXPERIMENT 00068 RULE SELECTION

As selected on Discord #botspam, the rule for this week is Rule 2556
("Penalties"). I affirm under penalty of No Faking that, to the
best of my knowledge, the process used in this selection had the correct
distribution.

Please send suggestions if you have them!

The text of Rule 2556 is reproduced below for convenience:


Rule 2556/1 (Power=3)
Penalties

   Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, an impure person CANNOT win
   the game.
   
   The voting strength of a player on an Agoran decision is reduced

   by 1 for every 3 blots in eir possession.
   
   A player CAN, with 7 days notice, deregister (exile) a specified

   player (the outlaw) who has more than 40 blots.


The voting strength of a player on an Agoran decision is reduced
by 1 for every 3 devices in eir possession.


DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] Slightly less self-interested proposal

2023-01-15 Thread Edward Murphy via agora-discussion

Janet wrote:


[Currently, I'm effectively locked out of owning any actually useful
stone without setting a Dream, which isn't really fair. If I attempt to


Is this actually true? I thought that had something to do with auctions,
which were repealed about a month ago, and any rule or regulation
actually putting the Stonemason on different footing may have been
repealed earlier than that (I spot-checked about four months back but
didn't spot anything relevant).