Re: DIS: Revamping public secrets

2023-03-05 Thread Edward Murphy via agora-discussion

juan wrote:


Here's the new version:

{
A Fingerprint for a document (the Plaintext) is a document that could
not have been reasonably created without knowledge of the Plaintext, and
which is related to the Plaintext in such a way that one could not
reasonably produce another document related to that Fingerprint in the
same way.

Where the rules define an action that a person CAN perform "by
commitment" to a particular kind of document, that person performs
that action by performing it by announcement while, in the same
message, also publishing a what is purportedly a Fingerprint for a
document of that kind.
}


I think this needs at least a write-up for the second half of the
process, e.g.

  Where the rules define an action (the Pitch) that a person CAN
  perform "by fulfillment" to a particular kind of document, that
  person performs that action by performing it by announcement
  while, in the same message, also publishing a document of that
  kind, specifying an action (the Wind-Up) that e previously
  performed by commitment to that kind of document, and specifying
  enough information to verify that the Wind-Up's Fingerprint
  corresponds to the Pitch's document. The Wind-Up is thereby
  fulfilled. A person CANNOT perform a Pitch by specifying a Wind-Up
  that was previously fulfilled.


DIS: Re: OFF: [Mad Engineer] Experiment 00075 - Rule Selection

2023-03-05 Thread Edward Murphy via agora-discussion

Janet wrote:


EXPERIMENT 00075 RULE SELECTION

As selected on Discord #botspam, the rule for this week is Rule 2327
("Read the Ruleset Week"). I affirm under penalty of No Faking that, to the
best of my knowledge, the process used in this selection had the correct
distribution.

Please send suggestions if you have them!

The text of Rule 2327 is reproduced below for convenience:


Rule 2327/3 (Power=1)
Read the Ruleset Week

   The first Agoran week each year which falls entirely in February
   is Read the Ruleset Week. Agorans are encouraged to read the
   ruleset during Read the Ruleset Week.


The first Agoran device each year which falls entirely in February is
Read the Ruleset Device.


DIS: (@Mad Engineer) Re: OFF: [Mad Engineer] Experiment 00075 - Intent to Invent

2023-03-05 Thread ais523 via agora-discussion
On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 16:50 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> I intend, with Agoran consent, to cause Rule 2655 to amend the Rule "The
> Device" by appending the following a a list item to the "When the device
> is on:" list:
> 
> {
> 
>   The first Agoran week each year which falls entirely in February
>   is Read the device Week. Agorans are encouraged to read the
>   ruleset during Read the device Week.
> 
> }

This intent can't be resolved, and doesn't fulfil your Mad Engineer
duties, because it doesn't consistently replace any given word with
"device" – you missed one copy of "ruleset".

-- 
ais523


Re: DIS: (@Mad Engineer) Re: OFF: [Mad Engineer] Experiment 00075 - Intent to Invent

2023-03-05 Thread Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
On 3/5/23 17:21, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 16:50 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote:
>> I intend, with Agoran consent, to cause Rule 2655 to amend the Rule "The
>> Device" by appending the following a a list item to the "When the device
>> is on:" list:
>>
>> {
>>
>>   The first Agoran week each year which falls entirely in February
>>   is Read the device Week. Agorans are encouraged to read the
>>   ruleset during Read the device Week.
>>
>> }
> This intent can't be resolved, and doesn't fulfil your Mad Engineer
> duties, because it doesn't consistently replace any given word with
> "device" – you missed one copy of "ruleset".
>

Oops, thank you.

-- 
Janet Cobb

Assessor, Mad Engineer, Rulekeepor, S​tonemason



DIS: Re: OFF: [Mad Engineer] Experiment 00075 - Intent to Invent (corrected)

2023-03-05 Thread Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
On Sun, Mar 5, 2023 at 2:23 PM Janet Cobb via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:

> EXPERIMENT 00075 INTENT TO INVENT (CORRECTED)
> 
>
>

I mean, I support any available intents to invent with number 00075,
including this one.
-- 
4st