DIS: Re: BUS: Reaching - Soul Stone [Attn. Stonemason]
On 4/15/23 18:32, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote: Oh, I just saw Snail's action. If I can, I reach for the Recursion Stone As of the current rules there's nothing wrong with reaching for the same one. Only one person will get eir reach anyway. -- nix Prime Minister, Herald
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Propositions 8952-8955
On 4/15/23 13:39, nix via agora-discussion wrote: If you want to change this I recommend writing a proposal to do so. Right now it feels more like taking hostages than negotiating. Ope! Disregard, didn't see the proposal introduced after. -- nix Prime Minister, Herald, Collector
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Propositions 8952-8955
On 4/15/23 03:04, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
I vote {AGAINST, but FOR instead if its author pledges or already is bound
to a pledge to not claim the Radiance they'd get from this Proposal passing}
If you want to change this I recommend writing a proposal to do so.
Right now it feels more like taking hostages than negotiating.
--
nix
Prime Minister, Herald, Collector
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal - Unradiance
On 4/15/23 09:59, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
I think the other forms to gain radiance seem alright, actually. This just
removes the "radiance conditions", of the which I'm not a huge fan of
(gaining radiance from proposals, mostly)
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 6:31 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
lør. 15. apr. 2023, 6:20 a.m. skrev Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org>:
I create and submit the following Proposal:
Title: Unradiance
AI: 1.0
Author: Yachay
Co-Authors: None
{
Repeal Rule 2657
}
I dislike this mostly because this isn't clean. There are many many
lingering references to radiance after just repealing only one rule.
Also, i think players should be winning more often, not less, so having
less ways to win is not so good.
Oooh, so this IS a clean cut, I didn't look closely. Oh, I do like
repealing things. I'm conflicted now. I like to repeal, but I also like
encouraging proposals. Mmmm I'll vote FOR probably, then. Just because :)
--
4st
Referee and Deputy(AKA FAKE) webmastor
Uncertified Bad Idea Generator
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal - Unradiance
I think the other forms to gain radiance seem alright, actually. This just
removes the "radiance conditions", of the which I'm not a huge fan of
(gaining radiance from proposals, mostly)
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 6:31 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> lør. 15. apr. 2023, 6:20 a.m. skrev Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org>:
>
> > I create and submit the following Proposal:
> >
> > Title: Unradiance
> > AI: 1.0
> > Author: Yachay
> > Co-Authors: None
> >
> > {
> >
> > Repeal Rule 2657
> >
> > }
> >
>
> I dislike this mostly because this isn't clean. There are many many
> lingering references to radiance after just repealing only one rule.
>
> Also, i think players should be winning more often, not less, so having
> less ways to win is not so good.
>
> >
>
DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal - Unradiance
lør. 15. apr. 2023, 6:20 a.m. skrev Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org>:
> I create and submit the following Proposal:
>
> Title: Unradiance
> AI: 1.0
> Author: Yachay
> Co-Authors: None
>
> {
>
> Repeal Rule 2657
>
> }
>
I dislike this mostly because this isn't clean. There are many many
lingering references to radiance after just repealing only one rule.
Also, i think players should be winning more often, not less, so having
less ways to win is not so good.
>
