I think the goal is to make it possible to shoot yourself in the foot
with apathy.
Intended effect (probably?):
1. A intents apathy
2. nobody objects
3. A has forgotten about intent, does nothing -> infraction
But the current phrasing would also make unsuccessful attempts illegal
as it says nothing about the intent having no objections
--wunst
Am 13.05.24 um 01:00 schrieb ais523 via agora-discussion:
On Sun, 2024-05-12 at 15:32 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-business
wrote:
Proposal: No apathetic apathy
Amend Rule 2465 (Victory by Apathy) by appending this text:
A player SHALL NOT announce intent to Declare Apathy and then
fail to Declare Apathy before that intent ceases to be ripe; such
failure is the Class 5 Infraction of Not Reading the Room.
What's the intention behind this one (and why such a high class)? Is
the intention to make failed Apathy attempts illegal?
