DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Propositions 9120-9121

2024-06-02 Thread Edward Murphy via agora-discussion

I vote as follows (and have updated the spreadsheet):


9120~   juniper 1.0   Labour Payment


AGAINST


9121~   juniper, mqyhlkahu  1.1   More Rules, Less Complex


PRESENT


DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Propositions 9114-9119

2024-06-02 Thread Aris via agora-discussion
I think Rule 2509 is relevant here? 'A "number of (items)", where (items)
is a set of discrete entities, is considered to refer to a non-negative
integer, unless otherwise explicitly specified.'

-Aris


On Sat, Jun 1, 2024 at 12:58 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:

> On 6/1/24 15:20, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> > The minimum is 0 just because of how paying fees work. You can't
> possibly create spendies or anything.
>
>
> Actually, the fee-based actions rules don't have any special cases for
> negative values, and you can't destroy a negative number of assets. So I
> think if the required fee is negative, it's just not possible to do (and
> this is... not a crazy outcome policy-wise?).
>
> --
> Janet Cobb
>
> Assessor, Rulekeepor, S​tonemason
>
>