DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Stonemason] Billboard Rock Chart - 12 May 2024
Ah, since Rule 2642 says “transferred”, but not specifying a particular cause. Understood. - Jaff On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 2:08 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 5/12/24 13:03, Jaff via agora-official wrote: > > StoneOwnerLast Wielded Stone Cost Immune? > > --- --- -- --- > > PowerAgora2024-04-01 7 > > Soul Agora2024-04-21 7 > > Sabotage Agora2023-10-25 9 > > MintyAgora2024-04-28 9 > > Protection Agora2024-04-01 5 > > RecursionAgora2024-04-01 7 Protection > > Hot Potato Agora2024-04-28 8 > > BlankAgora2024-04-01 5 > > Anti-Equatorial Agora2024-05-05 5 Protection > > Radiance Agora2024-05-06 9 > > Loud Agora 8 > > > This has since self-ratified, but all Stone Costs for stones transferred > to Agora on the stone reset should have gone back to 10. > > -- > Janet Cobb > > Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason >
DIS: Re: BUS: Delegation [attn. ADoP]
I support each intent. - Jaff On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 11:34 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > I intend, with support from Jaff, to flip the Delegate of Assessor to Jaff. > > I intend, with support from Jaff, to flip the Delegate of Stonemason to > Jaff. > > -- > Janet Cobb > > Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason > >
DIS: Re: BUS: (@stonemason)
If I am not mistaken, then chain of ownership since the last time Agora owned the stone is: Gaelan -> ais523 -> Murphy -> Jaff -> Janet -> Ben So I am not a valid target. - Jaff On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 4:14 AM Agora amdw42 via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > I wield the hot potato stone specifying Jaff > > —— > Ben >
DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] No Overpowered Deputizations
I will point out that there are multiple ways to take actions of an office
without holding it which this wouldn't cover, such as delegation. I think a
safer fix would be preventing a player who holds an office from taking
actions corresponding to another office such that holding both would make
them Overpowered.
- Jaff
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 9:50 PM secretsnail9 via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> {{{
> Title: No Overpowered Deputizations
> Adoption Index: 3.0
> Author: snail
> Co-authors: Janet, Murphy, Juniper
>
> Amend Rule 2160 (Deputisation) by replacing
>
> {
> When a player deputises for an elected office, e becomes the
> holder of that office, unless the deputisation is temporary,
> and/or the action being performed would already install someone
> into that office.
> }
>
> with
>
> {
> When a player deputises for an elected office, e becomes the holder
> of that office, unless the deputisation is temporary, doing so would make
> em Overpowered, and/or the action being performed would already install
> someone into that office.
> }
>
> }}}
> --
> snail
>
