Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Weekly Report

2019-06-18 Thread Jason Cobb

Well, not that anything will actually happen :P

Jason Cobb

On 6/18/19 12:03 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:

I point my finger at D. Margaux for the Crime of Making My Eyes Bleed.

Jason Cobb

On 6/18/19 8:25 AM, Rebecca wrote:
As I said, per the revised version of that CFJ, the referee CAN 
impose the

CHoJ, by announcement or some other mechanism

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:21 PM D. Margaux  
wrote:



I publish the below report and claim a 5 coin reward for doing so.

Referee’s Weekly Report
Date of This Report: 2019-06-18
Date of Last Report: 2019-06-12

BLOT HOLDINGS
===
This section self-ratifies.

Blots    Player
-    --
    8    Corona
    7    twg
    3    V.J. Rada
    3    Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
   1    L.
   1    Murphy

Blots    Fugitive
-    
   4    Kenyon

RECENT CHANGES
==
This section does not self-ratify.

[No recent changes because, evidently, players CANNOT expunge blots nor
impose the CHoJ]

RECENT FINGER POINTS & INVESTIGATION RESULTS
=
This section does not self-ratify.

2019-06-11 G. pointed eir finger at Aris for failure to publish a
Promotor's weekly report.  RESULT:  Finger pointing was well taken,
and Aris was fined 1 blot--except this was INEFFECTIVE because CHoJ is
broken.

2019-06-13 Falsifian pointed eir finger at D. Margaux and Murphy for
Abetting Heresy. RESULT: Finger pointing was well taken, and a fine 
of 3
blots on D. Margaux and 1 blot on Murphy was attempted and failed 
because

CHoJ is broken.

2019-06-16 Falsifian pointed eir finger at emself for Class 0
Oathbreaking. RESULT: Well taken, but I CANNOT impose a fine because 
the

CHoJ is broken.

2019-06-19 Jason Cobb pointed eir finger at Falsifian for Making eir 
Eyes
Bleed. RESULT; Well taken, but I CANNOT impose a fine because the 
CHoJ is

broken.







Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Weekly Report

2017-11-21 Thread Ørjan Johansen

On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote:


first of all, in my next ADoP report, should I just note this as one report or 
a report and a revision?


There was no formal CoE or anything so probably just one.


If you don't formally CoE it, then the first version could self-ratify, 
with the formatting errors.


Greetings,
Ørjan.