Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Rerenumbered Index
This is missing two of my proposals, which I admittedly submitted rather
late—maybe you intended to distribute them next week? Here they are, in case
you missed them:
{
Title: Calls with Memoranda
AI: 2
Co-authors: Aris, G, Alexis
Create a new Power-2 rule titled “Administrative Opinions”: {
An officer may publish an Administrative Opinion for a judicial case,
specifying a valid judgement for that case. Officers SHOULD only assign
Administrative Opinions to cases with which eir office is primarily concerned.
The Arbitor SHOULD record Administrative Opinions along with case judgements.
An officer who has published an Administrative Opinion for an unassigned case
may, without objection, Administratively Close a case, causing em to become the
judge for the case and eir Administrative Opinion to become the judgment for
the case. The Arbitor SHOULD NOT assign a judge to a case while proceedings to
Administratively Close it are ongoing.
}
}
{
Title: Calls for Memoranda
AI: 2
Co-authors: Aris, G
Amend rule 991 by appending “All other things being equal, the Arbitor SHOULD
assign Calls for Judgement to the officer most concerned with its content.”
after the sentence "The Arbitor SHALL assign judges over time such that all
interested players have reasonably equal opportunities to judge.”
}
Gaelan
> On Feb 12, 2020, at 9:08 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> Would someone please check me on this? I don't trust myself anymore.
>
> -Aris
> ---
> It has come to the attention of the Promotorial Proposal Office that certain
> proposals were incorrectly numbered. Twice. I sincerely apologize for this
> grave
> lapse.
>
> All proposals numbered 33## or 35## and distributed within the last week
> are hereby renumbered 83##, where the final two digits remain the same. Here
> is
> a revised index of proposals up for vote (each of the decisions on whether to
> adopt them has a quorum of 6). All players are hereby advised to treat these
> numbers as canonical from the present moment forward, and to vote in reply
> to this index as if it were an original distribution.
>
> ID Author(s)AITitle
> ---
> 8322* Falsifian, Alexis, twg 3.0 Unrepetition v1.1
> 8323* Jason3.0 Secure Ribbons
> 8324l Falsifian2.0 Democratic unassignment
> 8325e Falsifian2.0 Inflation Vote
> 8326* Falsifian3.0 Attempted cleanup
> 8327l Falsifian1.0 Blink test v1.2
> 8328* Falsifian3.0 The Eternal Sprit
> 8329p Alexis 1.0 RtRW Reschedule
> 8330* G. 3.0 No looting white ribbons
> 8331j Warrigal 1.7 Promissory cleanliness
> 8332f Murphy, Alexis 1.0 Switch Responsibility Responsibility
> 8333l Murphy, Alexis 2.0 Meaningful extra votes
> 8334e Murphy, Alexis 2.0 Meaningless extra coins
> 8335f Murphy 2.0 Consistent ADoP duties
> 8336* Jason3.0 Define "publicly"
> 8337e Murphy 1.0 Fix Auctions
> 8338l Murphy 2.0 Clarify quorum (option 1)
> 8339l Murphy 2.0 Clarify quorum (option 2)
> 8340p Alexis 1.0 The Paradox of Self-Appointment
> 8341* Alexis, G. 3.0 Support of the Person
>
> The proposal pool is currently empty.
>
> Legend: * : Democratic proposal.
># : Ordinary proposal, unset chamber.
>e : Economy ministry proposal.
>f : Efficiency ministry proposal.
>j : Justice ministry proposal.
>l : Legislation ministry proposal.
>p : Participation ministry proposal.
>
>
> The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below.
>
>
> //
> ID: 8322
> Title: Unrepetition v1.1
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Falsifian
> Co-authors: Alexis, twg
>
>
> For each of Proposals 8287-8307, if the proposal took effect more than
> once, then any changes to rule text caused by the second and later
> times the proposal took effect are considered "extra" for the purposes
> of this proposal.
>
> Reverse all such "extra" changes, in the reverse of the order in which
> they occurred.
>
> [Comment: See
> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2020-February/056587.html
> for context. I think the changes this undoes are relatively benign,
> but it's nice to have certainty about the state of the ruleset.]
>
> //
> ID: 8323
> Title: Secure Ribbons
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Jason
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend Rule 2438 (Ribbons) by replacing the text "Ribbon Ownership is a
> person switch" with the text "Ribbon Ownership is a secured person switch".
>
DIS: [Promotor] Draft Rerenumbered Index
Would someone please check me on this? I don't trust myself anymore. -Aris --- It has come to the attention of the Promotorial Proposal Office that certain proposals were incorrectly numbered. Twice. I sincerely apologize for this grave lapse. All proposals numbered 33## or 35## and distributed within the last week are hereby renumbered 83##, where the final two digits remain the same. Here is a revised index of proposals up for vote (each of the decisions on whether to adopt them has a quorum of 6). All players are hereby advised to treat these numbers as canonical from the present moment forward, and to vote in reply to this index as if it were an original distribution. ID Author(s)AITitle --- 8322* Falsifian, Alexis, twg 3.0 Unrepetition v1.1 8323* Jason3.0 Secure Ribbons 8324l Falsifian2.0 Democratic unassignment 8325e Falsifian2.0 Inflation Vote 8326* Falsifian3.0 Attempted cleanup 8327l Falsifian1.0 Blink test v1.2 8328* Falsifian3.0 The Eternal Sprit 8329p Alexis 1.0 RtRW Reschedule 8330* G. 3.0 No looting white ribbons 8331j Warrigal 1.7 Promissory cleanliness 8332f Murphy, Alexis 1.0 Switch Responsibility Responsibility 8333l Murphy, Alexis 2.0 Meaningful extra votes 8334e Murphy, Alexis 2.0 Meaningless extra coins 8335f Murphy 2.0 Consistent ADoP duties 8336* Jason3.0 Define "publicly" 8337e Murphy 1.0 Fix Auctions 8338l Murphy 2.0 Clarify quorum (option 1) 8339l Murphy 2.0 Clarify quorum (option 2) 8340p Alexis 1.0 The Paradox of Self-Appointment 8341* Alexis, G. 3.0 Support of the Person The proposal pool is currently empty. Legend: * : Democratic proposal. # : Ordinary proposal, unset chamber. e : Economy ministry proposal. f : Efficiency ministry proposal. j : Justice ministry proposal. l : Legislation ministry proposal. p : Participation ministry proposal. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. // ID: 8322 Title: Unrepetition v1.1 Adoption index: 3.0 Author: Falsifian Co-authors: Alexis, twg For each of Proposals 8287-8307, if the proposal took effect more than once, then any changes to rule text caused by the second and later times the proposal took effect are considered "extra" for the purposes of this proposal. Reverse all such "extra" changes, in the reverse of the order in which they occurred. [Comment: See https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2020-February/056587.html for context. I think the changes this undoes are relatively benign, but it's nice to have certainty about the state of the ruleset.] // ID: 8323 Title: Secure Ribbons Adoption index: 3.0 Author: Jason Co-authors: Amend Rule 2438 (Ribbons) by replacing the text "Ribbon Ownership is a person switch" with the text "Ribbon Ownership is a secured person switch". // ID: 8324 Title: Democratic unassignment Adoption index: 2.0 Author: Falsifian Co-authors: If Proposal 8320 (Promotorial Assignment) has been adopted, then amend the rule entitled "Proposal Chambers" by replacing "If a proposal in the Proposal Pool has its chamber unset" with "If the chamber of an ordinary proposal in the Proposal Pool is unset". // ID: 8325 Title: Inflation Vote Adoption index: 2.0 Author: Falsifian Co-authors: [Comments: Are we just going to let a steady stream of sufficiently dedicated players claim their standard victories? I say we raise the bar a little. There's been some talk of a larger re-working of the economy. In the meantime, this proposal calls for players to vote on a new number to replace the 1,000 coin victory fee. The median vote wins, favouring the higher vote if there are two middle votes. ] For the purpose of this proposal: * An Inflation Ballot is a body of text published during the voting period of this proposal that clearly, directly and without obfuscation specifies a single non-negative integer and that it is an Inflation Ballot. * Each player's Inflation Vote is the integer specified in the last Inflation Ballot they published, or "none" if they never published one. * P is the number of players with Inflation Votes other than "none". * Median is the (unique) integer such that that at least P/2 Inflation Votes are integers greater than or equal to
