DIS: Re: BAK: Distribution issues

[comex]

On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Kerim Aydin  wrote:
> H. Distributor omd,
>
> I have not received any emails from the agora mailing list since
> your note that the list was "back up" on May 30.
>
> I can't find anything changed on my end.  Anything on yours that
> might explain?

@400053923df706f5f5a4 starting delivery 15420: msg 2345390 to
remote ke...@u.washington.edu
@400053923df706f6015c status: local 0/10 remote 1/20
@400053923df7073613b4 delivery 15420: deferral:
CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/

Ugh.  I have no idea what qmail is doing.  Replying now in the
off-chance it works after upgrading even more packages; otherwise I'll
have to actually find the issue.

- occasionally much discord

DIS: Re: BAK: Distribution issues

[omd]

On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:41 PM, comex  wrote:
> Ugh.  I have no idea what qmail is doing.  Replying now in the
> off-chance it works after upgrading even more packages; otherwise I'll
> have to actually find the issue.

So... to be more specific, when Googling the issue, a known qmail
issue with DNS responses over 512 bytes came up, but I thought it
wasn't that, because when attempting to do the resolution for
u.washington.edu I didn't get more than 512 bytes.  But upon trying
again, I do indeed, so I guess there's some strange difference between
DNS servers and the bug is indeed that one.  I think I just need to
apply the relevant qmail patches.

Re: DIS: Re: BAK: Distribution issues

[omd]

On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:49 PM, omd  wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:41 PM, comex  wrote:
>> Ugh.  I have no idea what qmail is doing.  Replying now in the
>> off-chance it works after upgrading even more packages; otherwise I'll
>> have to actually find the issue.
>
> So... to be more specific, when Googling the issue, a known qmail
> issue with DNS responses over 512 bytes came up, but I thought it
> wasn't that, because when attempting to do the resolution for
> u.washington.edu I didn't get more than 512 bytes.  But upon trying
> again, I do indeed, so I guess there's some strange difference between
> DNS servers and the bug is indeed that one.  I think I just need to
> apply the relevant qmail patches.

If I don't send another message, then this message successfully
delivered to both players with the CNAME issue - you and x1122334455.

For the record, I don't see how this could actually be related to the
previous downtime, but perhaps I'm missing something (DNS caching?).

Re: DIS: Re: BAK: Distribution issues

[Kerim Aydin]

On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, omd wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:49 PM, omd  wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:41 PM, comex  wrote:
> >> Ugh.  I have no idea what qmail is doing.  Replying now in the
> >> off-chance it works after upgrading even more packages; otherwise I'll
> >> have to actually find the issue.
> >
> > So... to be more specific, when Googling the issue, a known qmail
> > issue with DNS responses over 512 bytes came up, but I thought it
> > wasn't that, because when attempting to do the resolution for
> > u.washington.edu I didn't get more than 512 bytes.  But upon trying
> > again, I do indeed, so I guess there's some strange difference between
> > DNS servers and the bug is indeed that one.  I think I just need to
> > apply the relevant qmail patches.
> 
> If I don't send another message, then this message successfully
> delivered to both players with the CNAME issue - you and x1122334455.
> 
> For the record, I don't see how this could actually be related to the
> previous downtime, but perhaps I'm missing something (DNS caching?).

Everything I was missing came is coming through in a slow stream.  I
don't know if you're doing that manually or just freed up a dam.
  
Here's the header of one of the delayed messages in case it helps:

Return-Path: 
Received: via tmail-2007f.22 (invoked by user kerim) for kerim+mail/agora; Fri, 
6 Jun 2014 17:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxe26.s.uw.edu (mxe26.s.uw.edu [173.250.227.26])
by cg04.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW14.04) with ESMTP id 
s57024rS006775
for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 17:02:04 -0700
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 17:02:04 -0700
Message-Id: <201406070002.s57024rs006...@cg04.u.washington.edu>
Received: from vps.qoid.us (comex.xen.prgmr.com [71.19.146.223])
by mxe26.s.uw.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW14.04) with SMTP id 
s5701xXa018332
for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 17:02:00 -0700
Received: (qmail 4894 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2014 02:35:18 -
Received: from localhost (HELO vps.qoid.us) (127.0.0.1)
  by vps.qoid.us with SMTP; 3 Jun 2014 02:35:18 -
Delivered-To: agn-agora-offic...@agoranomic.org
Received: (qmail 4885 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2014 02:35:17 -
Received: from 135-23-126-116.cpe.pppoe.ca (HELO orolo) (135.23.126.116)
 by vps.qoid.us with SMTP; 3 Jun 2014 02:35:17 -
From: =?utf-8?Q?Sean_Hunt?= 
To: =?utf-8?Q?Agora_Official?= 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 7669
X-BeenThere: agora-offic...@agoranomic.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Agora Nomic reports, etc. \(PF\)" 
List-Unsubscribe: 
, 
 
List-Archive: 

List-Post: 
List-Help: 
List-Subscribe: 
, 
 
Reply-To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
Errors-To: agora-official-boun...@agoranomic.org
Sender: "agora-official" 
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 
2014.6.6.235421
X-PMX-Server: mxe26.s.uw.edu
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report='
 NO_MESSAGE_ID 0.3, REPLYTO_FROM_DIFF_ADDY 0.1, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 
0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0,
BODY_SIZE_1100_1199 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, 
BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, NO_URI_FOUND 0, SPF_NONE 0,
__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_LIST_HEADER 0, 
__HAS_LIST_HELP 0, __HAS_LIST_SUBSCRIBE 0,
__HAS_LIST_UNSUBSCRIBE 0, __HAS_REPLYTO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, 
__MIME_VERSION 0, __STOCK_PHRASE_24 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0'