DIS: Re: BUS: [CotC] 2805a overtime

2010-06-27 Thread comex 
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Ed Murphy  wrote:
> CFJ 2805a entered its four-day overtime period about two hours
> ago.  See Rule 911 for details; H. Justiciar Yally, take note.
>
> I opine REMAND, requesting that H. Judge coppro explicitly address the
> pros/cons of accepting or rejecting implicit delimiters in light of

You need to specify with or without prejudice.

DIS: Re: BUS: [CotC] 2805a overtime

2010-07-01 Thread Ed Murphy 
Yally wrote:

> I opine REMAND as the Justicar's Opinion. I lean.

The opinion was ineffective because with/without prejudice was
not specified.