Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] VP Win clarification
On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 22:43 -0300, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> secretsnail9 via agora-business [2022-05-02 19:03]:
> > I submit the following proposal, and pend it by paying a fee of 1 pendant.
> > {
> > Amend Rule 2621 (VP Wins) by replacing "If a player has at least 20 more
> > Winsomes than any other player" with "If a player has at least 20 more
> > Winsomes than all other players".
> > }
> Honestly, that doesn't clarify it for me, but makes it more confusing.
> It makes me wonder if I should sum-up the other players' Winsomes. That
> use of “any” is pretty standard, but if you wish for something else,
> perhaps “has the most Winsomes by a margin of at least 20”, or “has at
> least 20 more Winsomes than the second player with the most Winsomes”.
I think the usual unambiguous way to write this is "If a player has at
least 20 more Winsomes than each other player".
--
ais523
DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] VP Win clarification
secretsnail9 via agora-business [2022-05-02 19:03]:
> I submit the following proposal, and pend it by paying a fee of 1 pendant.
>
> {
>
> Title: Let's make it clear
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: secretsnail
> Co-author(s):
>
>
> Amend Rule 2621 (VP Wins) by replacing "If a player has at least 20 more
> Winsomes than any other player" with "If a player has at least 20 more
> Winsomes than all other players".
>
> }
Honestly, that doesn't clarify it for me, but makes it more confusing.
It makes me wonder if I should sum-up the other players' Winsomes. That
use of “any” is pretty standard, but if you wish for something else,
perhaps “has the most Winsomes by a margin of at least 20”, or “has at
least 20 more Winsomes than the second player with the most Winsomes”.
--
juan
