DIS: Re: BUS: Equity case: PNP

[Zefram]

ais523 wrote:
However, given the PNP's stated method of acting, it might be quite
difficult to return the chits; it would require amending the contract
with support from all its members,

... which can be manifested by a contract between all the members,
such as an equation regarding the PNP.

-zefram

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Equity case: PNP

[comex]

On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 ais523 wrote:
However, given the PNP's stated method of acting, it might be quite
difficult to return the chits; it would require amending the contract
with support from all its members,

 ... which can be manifested by a contract between all the members,
 such as an equation regarding the PNP.

...which each party to the PnP would have to explicitly, willfully consent to.

DIS: Re: BUS: Equity case: PNP

[Ben Caplan]

On Sunday 6 July 2008 5:07:30 Geoffrey Spear wrote:
 I hereby initiate an equity case regarding the PerlNomic Partnership
 contract.  The parties to the contract are Pavitra, Wooble, abliss,
 ais523, chuck, comex, ehird, erez, ihope, jay, norgg, and woggle.
 
 It was not envisioned that the server on which the nomic underlying
 the partnership is hosted would stop working shortly after I
 transferred a large number of chits to the partnership.  Since I was
 under no obligation to transfer these chits to the partnership, the
 other partners couldn't reasonably expect to have access to them, so I
 believe it would be equitable to have the PNP transfer the chits back
 to me.
 
 --Wooble

I'm kind of hoping that PerlNomic will be back up reasonably soon, but
if you want your chits back, I'm fine with that too. (i.e., I agree
that your proposed resolution is equitable.)

Pavitra