Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Getting in on Agencies

[Josh T]

I probably should have also tested the directional control characters and a
right-to-left language, but there's only so much you can fit in three
words. Congratulations on your script being otherwise pretty much Unicode
5.0 compliant! (For reference, Unicode 10 is expected to be finalized later
this year)

天火狐

On 23 May 2017 at 17:18, Quazie  wrote:

> Note: Thanks for helping me test my script for unicode compliance -
> delighted that no changes were necessary to handle your unicode.
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:10 PM Josh T  wrote:
>
>> I resolve my quoted intention and establish the agency therein.
>>
>> 天火狐
>>
>> On 22 May 2017 at 15:33, Josh T  wrote:
>>
>>> I intend to establish the following Agency after 24 hours:
>>>
>>> Name: ⌑≌⋻ შეესაბამება एजेन्सी (⌑შए)
>>> Agents: All persons
>>> Powers: Any person may refer to this Agency by another name, provided
>>> that it is unambiguous. Given that the transliteration of the name, UShE is
>>> recommended.
>>>
>>> Additional notes: This agency is effectively the Unicode compliance
>>> agency, and exists to make sure that any system that we wring things
>>> through won't break due to surface-level Unicode problems.
>>>
>>> 天火狐
>>>
>>
>>

DIS: Re: BUS: Getting in on Agencies

[Quazie]

Note: Thanks for helping me test my script for unicode compliance -
delighted that no changes were necessary to handle your unicode.

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:10 PM Josh T  wrote:

> I resolve my quoted intention and establish the agency therein.
>
> 天火狐
>
> On 22 May 2017 at 15:33, Josh T  wrote:
>
>> I intend to establish the following Agency after 24 hours:
>>
>> Name: ⌑≌⋻ შეესაბამება एजेन्सी (⌑შए)
>> Agents: All persons
>> Powers: Any person may refer to this Agency by another name, provided
>> that it is unambiguous. Given that the transliteration of the name, UShE is
>> recommended.
>>
>> Additional notes: This agency is effectively the Unicode compliance
>> agency, and exists to make sure that any system that we wring things
>> through won't break due to surface-level Unicode problems.
>>
>> 天火狐
>>
>
>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Getting in on Agencies

[Josh T]

Here's a picture from my client for reference:

https://goo.gl/k21bMf

天火狐

On 22 May 2017 at 15:41, CuddleBeam  wrote:

> I think that's a very good idea!
>
> When I read this on the archives or attempt to see the message in my gmail
> interface I see boxes instead of certain characters tho
>
>

DIS: Re: BUS: Getting in on Agencies

[Josh T]

That's right. Specifically, this is an agency that allows people to refer
to it by another name consequence-free.

天火狐

On 22 May 2017 at 15:39, Quazie  wrote:

> So this is an agency that allows you to refer to this agency?
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:33 Josh T  wrote:
>
>> I intend to establish the following Agency after 24 hours:
>>
>> Name: ⌑≌⋻ შეესაბამება एजेन्सी (⌑შए)
>> Agents: All persons
>> Powers: Any person may refer to this Agency by another name, provided
>> that it is unambiguous. Given that the transliteration of the name, UShE is
>> recommended.
>>
>> Additional notes: This agency is effectively the Unicode compliance
>> agency, and exists to make sure that any system that we wring things
>> through won't break due to surface-level Unicode problems.
>>
>> 天火狐
>>
>

DIS: Re: BUS: Getting in on Agencies

[CuddleBeam]

I think that's a very good idea!

When I read this on the archives or attempt to see the message in my gmail
interface I see boxes instead of certain characters tho