On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wooble, I inform you of the following criminal case and invite you to
rebut the argument for your guilt:
http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2280
In many of the world's great legal systems, there is a notion that an
accused person is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable
doubt. In this case, the fact that the CotC accepted the plaintiff's
claim that e had received 2 support from Players of the game assumes
that my statement that I had deregistered ehird was false and that I
was therefore GUILTY. If this CFJ exists, I must be GUILTY, and the
fact that the courts are treating it as if it exists shows a bias
inherent in the system. Since I cannot receive a fair trial, it would
be manifestly unjust to assign any judgment other than
GUILTY/DISCHARGE.
If there is in fact a criminal CFJ with me as the defendant, I hereby
end the pre-trial phase. This fails if the appropriate judgment is
UNIMPUGNED.
Consider this message to be informal support of the initiation of the
CFJ. [My message, not Wooble's, of course]
