DIS: Re: BUS: Machine readability
Pavitra wrote: I transfer a prop from coppro to the PNP for breaking various automated tools that used to parse proposal distributions. Ineffective, ownership of props is restricted to first-class players.
DIS: Re: BUS: Machine readability
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 21:35, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: Benjamin Caplan wrote: I transfer a prop from coppro to the PNP for breaking various automated tools that used to parse proposal distributions. Pavitra I transfer a prop from the PNP to myself. There's no reason the PNP can't update eir scripts to read from my new format; it's not that different, as Murphy says. Both failonly first class entities can own props. BobTHJ
DIS: Re: BUS: Machine readability
Pavitra wrote: I transfer a prop from coppro to the PNP for breaking various automated tools that used to parse proposal distributions. How many such tools are there? Revising the admin interface for the Assessor DB wasn't too much trouble.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Machine readability
Ed Murphy wrote: Pavitra wrote: I transfer a prop from coppro to the PNP for breaking various automated tools that used to parse proposal distributions. How many such tools are there? Revising the admin interface for the Assessor DB wasn't too much trouble. At least one: the one that enables the PNP to exercise its (not inconsiderable) caste. Anyway, if you think I'm being unfair, you could always transfer a prop from me to coppro. Props are self-balancing that way. Pavitra signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
DIS: Re: BUS: Machine readability
coppro wrote: Benjamin Caplan wrote: I transfer a prop from coppro to the PNP for breaking various automated tools that used to parse proposal distributions. Pavitra I transfer a prop from the PNP to myself. There's no reason the PNP can't update eir scripts to read from my new format; it's not that different, as Murphy says. Ineffective, you can't transfer props to yourself.
