DIS: Re: BUS: MwoPs should not incur obligations

2009-05-20 Thread comex 
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Sean Hunt  wrote:
> Proposal: Justiciar has no duty (AI=2)

Aw, I was expecting something much more interesting.

Proto: Rests CANNOT be created in a Minister Without Portfolio's
possession, rules to the contrary notwithstanding.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: MwoPs should not incur obligations

2009-05-20 Thread Ed Murphy 
comex wrote:

> Proto: Rests CANNOT be created in a Minister Without Portfolio's
> possession, rules to the contrary notwithstanding.

A license to break the rules at will?  Thank you, no.

Proto: Rests CANNOT be created in a Minister Without Portfolio's
possession to penalize eir inaction, rules to the contrary
notwithstanding.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: MwoPs should not incur obligations

2009-05-20 Thread Sean Hunt 
Ed Murphy wrote:
> comex wrote:
> 
>> Proto: Rests CANNOT be created in a Minister Without Portfolio's
>> possession, rules to the contrary notwithstanding.
> 
> A license to break the rules at will?  Thank you, no.
> 
> Proto: Rests CANNOT be created in a Minister Without Portfolio's
> possession to penalize eir inaction, rules to the contrary
> notwithstanding.
I liked his better.

/me flips everyone to Savage.