DIS: Re: BUS: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5673-5673
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 15:38 -0700, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote: > This distribution of proposal 5673 initiates the Agoran > Decisions on whether to adopt it. The eligible voters for ordinary > proposals are the active players, the eligible voters for democratic > proposals are the active first-class players, and the vote collector > is the Assessor. comex: Stop messing around with the interface before the PNP is the Promotor; arguably you violated the PNP contract by causing it to distribute a vote when it wasn't allowed to. -- ais523
DIS: Re: BUS: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5673-5673
2008/8/15 The PerlNomic Partnership <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This distribution of proposal 5673 initiates the Agoran > Decisions on whether to adopt it. The eligible voters for ordinary > proposals are the active players, the eligible voters for democratic > proposals are the active first-class players, and the vote collector > is the Assessor. > > NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE > 5673 D 2 3.1 fds test Fri Aug 15 15:37:38 2008 - agora-propose.cgi: comex added proposal /var/www/sites/nomic.info/perlnomic/agora-proposals/undistributed.1 to the pool. Fri Aug 15 15:38:27 2008 - agora-distribute.cgi: Distributing Agoran proposal 5673. You won't be getting away with this if the PNP is elected, thanks to the equity court.
DIS: Re: BUS: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5673-5673
ais523 wrote: > On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 15:38 -0700, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote: >> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE > I vote as follows >> 5673 D 2 3.1 fds test > FORx1 (it's Democratic). Since the PNP is not Promotor, the alleged distribution did not distribute that proposal, and may or may not have submitted it.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5673-5673
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 6:41 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 15:38 -0700, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote: >> This distribution of proposal 5673 initiates the Agoran >> Decisions on whether to adopt it. The eligible voters for ordinary >> proposals are the active players, the eligible voters for democratic >> proposals are the active first-class players, and the vote collector >> is the Assessor. > comex: Stop messing around with the interface before the PNP is the > Promotor; arguably you violated the PNP contract by causing it to > distribute a vote when it wasn't allowed to. Hmmm... just testing it so that Agoran voters can see how the PNP would distribute proposals. Which seems fine, although it ought to send to official, not to business with a false "OFF:"
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5673-5673
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 6:47 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmmm... just testing it so that Agoran voters can see how the PNP > would distribute proposals. Which seems fine, although it ought to > send to official, not to business with a false "OFF:" Proposed, but I'll need to subscribe the email account to a-o.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5673-5673
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 14:07 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > ais523 wrote: > > > On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 15:38 -0700, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote: > >> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE > > I vote as follows > >> 5673 D 2 3.1 fds test > > FORx1 (it's Democratic). > > Since the PNP is not Promotor, the alleged distribution did not > distribute that proposal, and may or may not have submitted it. Yes, I was just wondering what would happen. Another case for the courts, I expect, just not sure how to word it. -- ais523
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5673-5673
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 15:10, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 14:07 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: >> ais523 wrote: >> >> > On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 15:38 -0700, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote: >> >> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE >> > I vote as follows >> >> 5673 D 2 3.1 fds test >> > FORx1 (it's Democratic). >> >> Since the PNP is not Promotor, the alleged distribution did not >> distribute that proposal, and may or may not have submitted it. > Yes, I was just wondering what would happen. Another case for the > courts, I expect, just not sure how to word it. The PNP should conditionally retract the proposal, which will work well enough. -woggle
