DIS: Re: BUS: Petition for Correction

2018-06-20 Thread Ned Strange
aren't people specifically banned from changing rules to all caps or
from them in this way

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Aris Merchant
 wrote:
> Despite this being a meaningful semantic change, it's also a blatantly
> obvious typo fix. Without objection, I intend to change the text
> "SHALL" to "shall" in Rule 2515, "Distributing Assets".
>
> -Aris
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:25 PM Aris Merchant
>  wrote:
>>
>> Without objection, I do so.
>>
>> -Aris
>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 6:51 PM Aris Merchant
>>  wrote:
>> >
>> > Without objection, I intend to change the text "statment" to
>> > "statement" in Rule 2471, "No Faking".
>> >
>> > -Aris



-- 
>From V.J. Rada


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Petition for Correction

2018-06-20 Thread Aris Merchant
Nope, although they used to be. The rule cleanup rule was reverted to
an earlier form by Proposal 8000 (technically, the new one was
repealed and the old one reenacted). In my book, this side effect is
really a good thing. This is easily one of the most common types of
errors that needs to be fixed.

-ArisOn Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:41 PM Ned Strange
 wrote:
>
> aren't people specifically banned from changing rules to all caps or
> from them in this way
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Aris Merchant
>  wrote:
> > Despite this being a meaningful semantic change, it's also a blatantly
> > obvious typo fix. Without objection, I intend to change the text
> > "SHALL" to "shall" in Rule 2515, "Distributing Assets".
> >
> > -Aris
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:25 PM Aris Merchant
> >  wrote:
> >>
> >> Without objection, I do so.
> >>
> >> -Aris
> >> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 6:51 PM Aris Merchant
> >>  wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Without objection, I intend to change the text "statment" to
> >> > "statement" in Rule 2471, "No Faking".
> >> >
> >> > -Aris
>
>
>
> --
> From V.J. Rada


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Petition for Correction

2018-06-21 Thread ATMunn
It's "without objection" anyway, so if someone tried to actually do harm 
with it, someone could just object.


On 6/21/2018 12:54 AM, Aris Merchant wrote:

Nope, although they used to be. The rule cleanup rule was reverted to
an earlier form by Proposal 8000 (technically, the new one was
repealed and the old one reenacted). In my book, this side effect is
really a good thing. This is easily one of the most common types of
errors that needs to be fixed.

-ArisOn Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:41 PM Ned Strange
 wrote:


aren't people specifically banned from changing rules to all caps or
from them in this way

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Aris Merchant
 wrote:

Despite this being a meaningful semantic change, it's also a blatantly
obvious typo fix. Without objection, I intend to change the text
"SHALL" to "shall" in Rule 2515, "Distributing Assets".

-Aris
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:25 PM Aris Merchant
 wrote:


Without objection, I do so.

-Aris
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 6:51 PM Aris Merchant
 wrote:


Without objection, I intend to change the text "statment" to
"statement" in Rule 2471, "No Faking".

-Aris




--
 From V.J. Rada