Zefram wrote:
Please don't renumber Rules. It screws up the amendment numbers (though
I see they're no longer formally defined).
Things like amendment numbers were explicitly left to game custom
as part of increasing Officers' discretion in their recordkeeping,
but also in anticipation of the judiciary game picking up (e.g.
more authority of judges to regulate items like this based on
custom).
Didn't mean that to apply to repeals tho, that there's a bug :).
Agree with the nervousness of renumbering... how does it interact
with R1586, for example? (both in continuity and same names).
-Goethe